myjobismommy
New Member
...
Last edited:
I only know what I have read in The Recorder and what I have heard from my friend. It seems like they plan to get rid of some 30 to 50 teachers, none of which have obtained their "tenure," which means they have only been teaching for a year or two. I must say, however, that some of the classrooms in Calvert County's high schools are small, with only 8 or 10 students, and many of those classes have two teachers. Also, quite a few students have one-on-one teachers or aides working with them. That has to be costly.
I only know what I have read in The Recorder and what I have heard from my friend. It seems like they plan to get rid of some 30 to 50 teachers, none of which have obtained their "tenure," which means they have only been teaching for a year or two. I must say, however, that some of the classrooms in Calvert County's high schools are small, with only 8 or 10 students, and many of those classes have two teachers. Also, quite a few students have one-on-one teachers or aides working with them. That has to be costly.
I only know what I have read in The Recorder and what I have heard from my friend. It seems like they plan to get rid of some 30 to 50 teachers, none of which have obtained their "tenure," which means they have only been teaching for a year or two. I must say, however, that some of the classrooms in Calvert County's high schools are small, with only 8 or 10 students, and many of those classes have two teachers. Also, quite a few students have one-on-one teachers or aides working with them. That has to be costly.
It only makes sense. Lay-off the teachers making $50K a year and keep the ones making $75K a year. Create a void so in 5 years when the $75K tenured teachers retire there is not a cadre of experienced people to move up so you fill the holes with rookies.
Today, while talking with a member of the Calvert County Public School System, I was informed that many teachers are losing their jobs. Notices go out in April - and decisions on classes will be determined once the schools know how many teachers they are working with.
Anyone have any other info on this?
I only know what I have read in The Recorder and what I have heard from my friend. It seems like they plan to get rid of some 30 to 50 teachers, none of which have obtained their "tenure," which means they have only been teaching for a year or two. I must say, however, that some of the classrooms in Calvert County's high schools are small, with only 8 or 10 students, and many of those classes have two teachers. Also, quite a few students have one-on-one teachers or aides working with them. That has to be costly.
Today, while talking with a member of the Calvert County Public School System, I was informed that many teachers are losing their jobs. Notices go out in April - and decisions on classes will be determined once the schools know how many teachers they are working with.
Anyone have any other info on this?
Today, while talking with a member of the Calvert County Public School System, I was informed that many teachers are losing their jobs. Notices go out in April - and decisions on classes will be determined once the schools know how many teachers they are working with.
Anyone have any other info on this?
this is very sad. the ones that suffer the most here are the children. im embarrased for calvert about this. But those that made these decisions are bound by law to balance their budget and have no other choice.
Can't do it. Union dues eat up all his non-taxed income already.
Good post. You need to donate more because i dont. i couldnt make my marriage work so now i underpay my employees. i ride the backs of the tax payers so little dilligan can go to private school while my employees can barely afford to make an honest living. because dilligan goes to private school i dont really care what teachers make. im selfish and all about myself which shows in my employees paychecks.
Union thinking evident here.
I guess it is for a similar reason that I hear about black boys in math class not doing a DAMNED THING (by their own admission), and still getting a B in the class.
Does anyone know how you would measure a teacher's "performance?" Many people do not know that you are not measured by your class as a whole. Let's say that your AYP (Annual Yearly Progress) goal is 81% for the MSA. Your overall AYP could be 85%, but that doesn't mean you met your goals as a teacher because the class is divided into "subgroups." African American, Hispanic, Special Ed., FARMS, Asian, Indian, etc.
85% of my class could pass their test, but I could still fail because one of my subgroups gets less than the 81% goal. Percentages are tricky and some kids fit into more than one subgroup. I could have a special ed, African American, FARMS student. If that student fails for any reason (disability, terrible homelife, weak work ethic, etc) I could be in danger of failing in three seperate subgroups. I might only have two special education students in my class of 25, but if one fails the test, then my subgroup only had a 50% success. Am I a failure? I could work one-on-one with the student, I could tutor the student, the student could get pulled for all sorts of interventions. I didn't create the kid. I don't make sure he/she has clean clothes, does their homework, feeds them healthy foods, or make sure they get a good night's sleep. I try to motivate. How do I know that the parents or parent are saying the right things to motivate?
I have my own family. I went to college and earned a degree. I obtained a job and go at it hard every day. How do you judge my performance in a fair manner?
Teachers (in fact, the entire education industry) should be judged by the outcome of all the resources poured into the system. The NCLB act was a first attempt at measuring the value (value divided by cost) of the product produced. The 81% cited in your example is the 'pass' grade. If a child cannot read, do math, reason at a passing level on a standardized test, that child is a defective product of the system. If a unit of the enterprise cannot produce a standard number of non-defective products, it needs to be drastically corrected. NCLB includes an advancing standard over the years to lead to 'No Child Left Behind.'
That's why it is a waste of resources to have 20-40% of your assets working in a central office, millions of dollars spent on a glamorous physical plant that does ANYTHING that is not directly contributing to production of non-defective products.
How you choose to measure the effectiveness or 'value' of individuals in the process needs to ALWAYS be based on the quality of the product. That is based on the educational ability of each and every student.