Abortion is a piss poor method of birth control, but spending $500 (?) once beats spending $9000 (or more?) to raise just one of her future criminals.
Like a hell-broth boil and bubble.
Double, double toil and trouble;
So why don't you go and perform post birth abortions and save yourself a lot of money.
Yea, a dispicable action to even consider, but to illustrate what are you suggesting when you say we could have saved a lot of money by aborting the children before we even knew how things would turn out?
Seeing abortion as ending a life, does NOT relieve parents of the responsibility to take care of their children.
If you see abortion as merely a procedure to save the public trust funds, then why would you be against the same action performed later to save money?
Serously, we want to be a Society that kills their children as part of economic policy? At least Sparta killed only children they judged to weak to serve as warriors.
And liberals accuse conservative of just wanting the poor to die.
This woman is holding her own kids hostage to the public, you don't give me more money, they'll suffer!
Everyone is bending over backwards to help her, but somehow the kids just don't get what they need, yet no one else is in the same situation. When does it become obvious that its NOT the lack of help given this woman, its this woman's own behaviour that is putting her in this situation, and causing her kids to suffer.