Recess Appointments and the Balance of Powers

cwo_ghwebb

No Use for Donk Twits
Over the course of our Republic, presidents have often tested the limits of their constitutional power. Without the checks provided for in the Constitution our executive branch would easily have digested the other two long ago. But as long as the legislative and judicial branches invoke their constitutional responsibility, executive overreach is contained. When they fail to act, the balance of power is shifted and liberty is the price we pay.

So it should come as no surprise when the president began to nominate extremists like Van Jones and Craig Becker, he intended to test the limits of his power. Aided by Senator Harry Reid, he would by pass the Senate’s confirmation process by waiting for Congress to recess, thus allowing him to invoke his recess appointment power. Reid would acquiesce, protecting vulnerable Democrat senators from having to vote on controversial nominees.

However, the president and Senator Reid neglected to consult one document – the U.S. Constitution which reads in Article 1, Section 5: “Neither House, during the Session of Congress, shall, without the Consent of the other, adjourn for more than three days…”

Recognizing that the Senate cannot recess unless the House recesses I begin circulating a letter asking other Members of Congress to join me in urging Speaker Boehner to have the House remain in session, preventing the president from making recess appointments. Within two weeks, over 75 other members of Congress joined this effort.

Many senior congressmen of both parties ridiculed the idea, noting that it would require a congressman to stay in Washington even during holidays to hold pro-forma sessions, possibly interfering with campaign events back home. While not enthusiastic about the idea, the Speaker agreed, conditioning that it would be my responsibility, and those who joined this cause, to run those sessions that he was not obligated to perform.
Recess Appointments and the Balance of Powers | RedState

Pesky thing, that Constitution! It would appear that too many in power would like to ignore it. Now the Courts have to step up and do their jobs.
 
Top