Did Muslim Oil Billionaires Finance Obama?

[Odessa78]

1979 article by Vernon Jarrett, Valerie Jarrett's father-in-law, about Khalid al-Mansour.

Would Muslim oil billionaires finance and develop controlling relationships with black college students? Well, like anyone else, they would do it for self-interest. And what would their self-interest be? We all know the top two answers to that question: 1. a Palestinian state and 2. the advancement of Islam in America. The idea then was to advance blacks who would facilitate these two goals to positions of power in the Federal government, preferably, of course, the Presidency. And why would the Arabs target blacks in particular for this job? Well, for the same reason the early communists chose them as their vanguard for revolution (which literally means “change”) in America. Allow me to quote Trotsky, in 1939: “The American Negroes, for centuries the most oppressed section of American society and the most discriminated against, are potentially the most revolutionary element of the population. They are designated by their historical past to be, under adequate leadership, the very vanguard of the proletarian revolution.” Substitute the word “Islam” for the words “the proletarian revolution,” and you most clearly get the picture, as Islam is a revolutionary movement just like communism is. (Trivia: it is from this very quote that communist Van Jones takes his name. Van is short for vanguard. He was born “Anthony”). In addition, long before 1979, blacks had become the vanguard of the spread of Islam in America, especially in prisons.



Bombshell Obama Vetting: 1979 Newspaper Article By Valerie Jarrett's Father-In-Law Reveals Start Of Muslim Purchase Of U.S. Presidency... | RedFlagNews.com

 

[Larry Gude]

Did Muslim Oil Billionaires Finance Obama?

Only seems fair seeings how Bush funded them first.


We've been bleeding well over $500 billion a year in oil prices that are WAY too high, all to serve the glorious cause of neo conservatism in our self inflicted wounds of our geopolitical wet dreams of getting people to be just like us, liberty and freedom...at the end of a gun...and, now, over 10 years later, will in excess of $5 trillion, cash, has got to find it's way somewhere(s).


Unlike us, Muslims like to see a return on their investment.

 

[kwillia]

Today, gas prices are racing toward the $4 mark months before the usual warm-weather spike in prices and Democrats should be worried about history repeating itself.

The Obama Democrats are saying the same things as Republicans did eight years ago, but it doesn’t do much for strapped middle-income families to explain that higher gas prices are evidence of economic recovery.

For a family of average income, paying $10 more per tank of gas compared to one month ago hurts a lot. Add in the fact that their income dropped by $40 a week under the president’s year-end tax deal and you start to see some real suffering.

There’s the larger concern about the dangers to the fragile recovery. The loss of so much disposable will do a lot to make families feel poorer, which makes them spend less, borrow less and do less to stimulate growth.


Read more: High Gas Prices Endanger Democrats | Fox News

 

[tommyjo]

Today, gas prices are racing toward the $4 mark months before the usual warm-weather spike in prices and Democrats should be worried about history repeating itself.

The Obama Democrats are saying the same things as Republicans did eight years ago, but it doesn’t do much for strapped middle-income families to explain that higher gas prices are evidence of economic recovery.

For a family of average income, paying $10 more per tank of gas compared to one month ago hurts a lot. Add in the fact that their income dropped by $40 a week under the president’s year-end tax deal and you start to see some real suffering.

There’s the larger concern about the dangers to the fragile recovery. The loss of so much disposable will do a lot to make families feel poorer, which makes them spend less, borrow less and do less to stimulate growth.


Read more: High Gas Prices Endanger Democrats | Fox News

Interesting that "conservatives" harp on these two point but can't understand that govt spending also supports a weak economy.

 

[Lurk]

Interesting that "conservatives" harp on these two point but can't understand that govt spending also supports a weak economy.

Yes, that is abundantly true. Problem is, we need to be supporting a strong economy. Once again the libs get it wrong.

 

[Larry Gude]

Interesting that "conservatives" harp on these two point but can't understand that govt spending also supports a weak economy.

No it doesn't. Government spending when the economy is poor and structurally broken is like giving yourself a blood transfusion.

It's one thing to borrow against future growth IF there is sound argument that the borrowing will get you to a sound footing. That's simply not the case in this economy.

That we have been borrowing and spending like crazy for over 5 years would support your theory were the economy booming or even stable.

That it has failed to miserably has completely dispelled that theory.

 

[Larry Gude]

Today, gas prices are racing toward the $4 mark months before the usual warm-weather spike in prices and Democrats should be worried about history repeating itself.

The Obama Democrats are saying the same things as Republicans did eight years ago, but it doesn’t do much for strapped middle-income families to explain that higher gas prices are evidence of economic recovery.

For a family of average income, paying $10 more per tank of gas compared to one month ago hurts a lot. Add in the fact that their income dropped by $40 a week under the president’s year-end tax deal and you start to see some real suffering.

There’s the larger concern about the dangers to the fragile recovery. The loss of so much disposable will do a lot to make families feel poorer, which makes them spend less, borrow less and do less to stimulate growth.
]

If the D's had a unified GOP that supported cheap energy, that would be something to worry about. That so many GOP'ers are fine with $100 oil and $4 gas means D's really don't have much to worry about. At worst, more voters go independent but, that is more a threat to GOP'ers at this point than D's.

 

[Gilligan]

No it doesn't. Government spending when the economy is poor and structurally broken is like giving yourself a blood transfusion.

.

It's even worse than that. It's like giving yourself a very sloppy and inept transfusion of your own blood..spilling about a quarter of it on the ground in the process.

 

[Larry Gude]

It's even worse than that. It's like giving yourself a very sloppy and inept transfusion of your own blood..spilling about a quarter of it on the ground in the process.

That is substantially better than I would have presumed.

 

[b23hqb]

It's even worse than that. It's like giving yourself a very sloppy and inept transfusion of your own blood..spilling about a quarter of it on the ground in the process.

.....then sponging up the blood, and re-infusing an even more tainted specimen back into the system to cause further hemmoraging.

 

[Gilligan]

That is substantially better than I would have presumed.

Barry's economic dream team, in their analysis that was the backstop to the stimulus spending bill, predicted that every dollar would result in a dollar of effective GDP growth. They opined and hoped it could be higher than that..say 1.35 of effect for every dollar spent. They warned in a very lukewarm fashion that it could be lower than 1:1

Studies that I've seen, done later, show that the best results approached 75 cents on the dolalr whilst some claim that the overall average was a poor as 35 cents for every dollar spent.

So spilling "only" one quarter of our own blood on the ground whilst giving ourselves a transfusion was, I contend, being "kind" to the SCOAMF and his hapless economic crew.

 

[PsyOps]

Interesting that "conservatives" harp on these two point but can't understand that govt spending also supports a weak economy.

And here comes ToJo to tell us, once again, what we don't understand while not bothering to explain it to us.

 

[Gilligan]

And here comes ToJo to tell us, once again, what we don't understand while not bothering to explain it to us.

She's a one-post-wonder. Farts, darts, and never returns.

Might be nhboy's mom.

 

[PsyOps]

No it doesn't. Government spending when the economy is poor and structurally broken is like giving yourself a blood transfusion.

It's one thing to borrow against future growth IF there is sound argument that the borrowing will get you to a sound footing. That's simply not the case in this economy.

That we have been borrowing and spending like crazy for over 5 years would support your theory were the economy booming or even stable.

That it has failed to miserably has completely dispelled that theory.

rintmonopolymoneydebt:

 

[BOP]

Interesting that "conservatives" harp on these two point but can't understand that govt spending also supports a weak economy.

You forgot the part of continuing to spend and spend and spend, while borrowing, borrowing, borrowing the money to spend, spend, spend.

 

[Larry Gude]

Studies that I've seen, done later, show that the best results approached 75 cents on the dolalr whilst some claim that the overall average was a poor as 35 cents for every dollar spent.

I'd like to know how we got 35 cents out of it. Last time I pissed behind the dumpster it was pretty much a net zero deal.

Consider even the stimulus; At best, all it did was pay for stuff that HAS to be cut because states don't have the taxes coming in to sustain those expenses so, once the Stimulati is over, the expenses remain.

You can't borrow to pay for extra's and hope to see a return. By definition, state expenses are ALL extras because they MUST come from the tax base of the people in the state which means it's gotta come from the people's dough AFTER they pay their bills or it's all lose/lose.

Unemployement benefits are the same thing. I think the self transfusion analogy is a good one. Obama is taking it to donating vital organs to ones self absent, completely abesnt, correcting ANY of the damaging behavior.

 

[Salvador]

She's a one-post-wonder. Farts, darts, and never returns.

Might be nhboy's mom.

When you're not talkin bout yourself you're trollin! Way to go Jimmy! Per usual nothing to say!