Originally posted by justhangn
I guess if you don't like the crime rate in your area, you should just move instead of taking back your streets, huh Nodnard.
There is no excuse for poor service. The little dipstick AND the manager need to be replaced in that instance.
Now that's apples to oranges. No reasonable person would liken the severity of neighborhood crime to some snot-nosed punk who won't smile, bagging your big mac and fries.
I simply said that if you're going to be upset by someone who is putting in time for minimum wage, then you should probably change your outlook. Fast food drive-thru is right between the Big-Bite counter at 7-11 and all-you-can-eat buffets, in the pecking order of restaurants.
I'm not saying that these kids shouldn't act differently. Sure, their parents should motivate them. But don't assume that the parents are any better... They probably don't see the light at the end of the tunnel, and probably don't have a strong role model to influence them.
I'm just saying that if you have more going on than they do, then you shouldn't allow yourself to be upset by them. Smile, treat them better than they treat you, and maybe you'll have an impact. But I assure you that if you come back at them, you're just adding to whatever problem they already have and no one will win.
Because unemployment is so low, employers can't find better people. Training has something to do with it, but you still have to have something to train. Sure, replace them. But you're replacing one attitude with the next.
If you, the consumer, REALLY want to have an impact on the folks who frustrate you, give them something positive, treat them with respect, and hope that the guy behind you does the same. Maybe they'll see that life is good, people are nice, and there's a better life if you follow that example.
My original post was somewhat tongue-in-cheek, but what parts of my argument above do you disagree with, chuckster? I can only speak from the restaurant consumers' perspective.