Judge upholds CT gun laws
- Thread starter Chris0nllyn
- Start date
Hijinx
Well-Known Member
How many troops does the Judge have. I know, I know the Police and the military if Connecticut decides to go to war.
The next step is how many have to get arrested and charged with felonies before they break down and allow this travesty to continue.
Get out of Connecticut is my advice.
Chris0nllyn
Well-Known Member
I'm sick and tired of the "We know it limits your 2A rights, but it's for public safety" argument.
If that's the case, why not Stop and Frisk everywhere? It burdens people's 4A rights, but it's for safety.
Public Demonstrations should be banned. It burdens your 1A rights, but they can turn into riots quickly, and if we get rid of them, it's more safe.
Not to mention the door this opens up for more restrictive laws in anti-gun states. (i.e. Maryland) I imagine we'll need to register our grandathered ARs and "high capacity mags".
It's worth noting (to anyone interested) he was appointed by George H W Bush.
If that's the case, why not Stop and Frisk everywhere? It burdens people's 4A rights, but it's for safety.
Public Demonstrations should be banned. It burdens your 1A rights, but they can turn into riots quickly, and if we get rid of them, it's more safe.
Not to mention the door this opens up for more restrictive laws in anti-gun states. (i.e. Maryland) I imagine we'll need to register our grandathered ARs and "high capacity mags".
It's worth noting (to anyone interested) he was appointed by George H W Bush.
Last edited:
Hijinx
Well-Known Member
We have an election coming up in Maryland. Let's get rid of the turds that pass these laws.
Chris0nllyn
Well-Known Member
Good luck with that. Dems hold the majority...by a long shot.
There is a DINO movement though. How large it is, and how much it really effects anythig is yet to be seen.
So why are right wing gun nuts against safety ?The law does not ban guns.
The law is specific ,read it .Sorry I forgot you don't read things you just attack posters.
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-gTGP7CquSQc/T8IiVxHAB5I/AAAAAAAABH4/ETLyTbT_Ln0/s1600/bully.png
What, exactly, does the CT law do that improves public safety? Be specific.
Lurk
Happy Creepy Ass Cracka
I'll bet the CT gun law doesn't reference Facebook bullies on internet forums.
This_person
Well-Known Member
Since the two main purposes of the second amendment are to allow citizens to help protect the country from foreign or domestic aggression, and to overthrow a tyrannical government, this law makes it much safer for aggressors and tyrants. :shrug: Seems pretty clear.
Nothing. It just makes citizens less able to care for themselves, and simply gives more power to the state. Don't just leave CT, but leave in a hurry and diminish the tax base even further. That should translate into less government, right, and less intrusion?
Nothing. It just makes citizens less able to care for themselves, and simply gives more power to the state. Don't just leave CT, but leave in a hurry and diminish the tax base even further. That should translate into less government, right, and less intrusion?
How Jr ,does it ban all guns ?
What, exactly, does the CT law do that improves public safety? Be specific.
This_person
Well-Known Member
It doesn't. It simply infringes on the right of the people to keep and bear arms by limiting the arms that can be kept and borne. How does that improve safety? If less arms are the key, are you for disarming SWAT, then the police in general, and then the military?
Who said it did, bb brain? It just takes away rights of citizens to have weapons that keep your sugar daddy's goals at a safe distance.
Meanwhile, we can find plenty of examples like these:
http://dailycaller.com/2014/02/25/fbi-more-guns-less-violent-crime/
http://www.bostonmagazine.com/news/blog/2013/08/30/harvard-gun-study-no-decrease-in-violence-with-ban/
http://dailycaller.com/2014/02/25/fbi-more-guns-less-violent-crime/
http://www.bostonmagazine.com/news/blog/2013/08/30/harvard-gun-study-no-decrease-in-violence-with-ban/
PsyOps
Pixelated
The thing is, it shouldn't matter if these laws make the state safer. That's not the purpose of our courts; to uphold laws that violate the constitution in the interest of public safety.
But..................................................... As an uninformed, uneducated public, we get the government we deserve.