New Positions Being Created in IRS

b23hqb

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
That might mean the atheists who are hired have to listen.

Or not. They could just employ techniques by recording devices on their person that pick up trigger words, while they sit in blissful ignorance with their heads stuck up their collective butt.

Just another disgusting, low life turn for those who wish to deny others freedom of speech and religion.

As for me, I will simply not conform.
 
Last edited:

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
Points:

A lawsuit filed by the Wisconsin-based Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF) asserted that the Internal Revenue Service ignored complaints about churches' violating their tax-exempt status by routinely promoting political issues, legislation and candidates from the pulpit.

The FFRF has temporarily withdrawn its suit in return for the IRS's agreement to monitor sermons and homilies for proscribed speech that the foundation believes includes things like condemnation of gay marriage and criticism of ObamaCare for its contraceptive mandate.


The FFRF cites as its authority the 1954 Johnson Amendment, which states that tax-exempt groups cannot endorse candidates.


1st: how many democrats have stopped in for Sunday service, and got up on the pulpit to give a POLITICAL SPEECH ...
2nd: the aforementioned 'pc buzzwords' can be in any homily addressing sin, and not be advocating for any candidate are preachers supposed to avoid buzzwords now, cannot mention gay marriage, or abortion
 

b23hqb

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
Points:




1st: how many democrats have stopped in for Sunday service, and got up on the pulpit to give a POLITICAL SPEECH ...
2nd: the aforementioned 'pc buzzwords' can be in any homily addressing sin, and not be advocating for any candidate are preachers supposed to avoid buzzwords now, cannot mention gay marriage, or abortion

Right on both points. Just more proof this attempt to stifle disagreement with the PC pro-abortion pro-homosexual leftists shows more and more the intolerance the left really is.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
Right on both points. Just more proof this attempt to stifle disagreement with the PC pro-abortion pro-homosexual leftists shows more and more the intolerance the left really is.



I just giggle, knowing when ISIS takes over, these progressives will be losing their heads
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
IRS Agrees to Target and Monitor Churches, Because Angry Atheists Demanded It?



The new IRS targeting program has been instituted at the behest of the angry atheist group Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF).

The IRS caved to the same FFRF that has tried, and notoriously failed, to strip “In God We Trust” from our currency, tear down World War II memorials, ban the National Day of Prayer, attack the Star of David in a Holocaust memorial, and even deny that Moses is depicted in the Supreme Court.

FFRF filed a lawsuit against the IRS in 2012 demanding that the Obama Administration delve deep into preaching from the pulpit to ensure that pastors, priests, and parishioners don’t say anything within the four walls of a church that could be construed as political.

Instead of refusing to impose a draconian monitoring program into the free speech of churches, the IRS caved, settling the case and agreeing with the angry atheist group that churches should be targets of federal IRS monitoring. The worst part? The IRS is keeping the details of its settlement, agreeing to target churches, a secret.

As Fox News reported, this deal with the IRS not only violates the First Amendment but could lead to the IRS literally monitoring sermons on Sunday morning and challenging churches’ tax-exempt status if they take a religious position on issues such as abortion.

FFRF responded that these concerns are nothing more than the “hysterical disinformation machine that is Fox News Network.”

Nothing could be further from the truth. This is a real and direct threat to the religious freedom and free speech of churches.

Churches have a constitutionally protected right to discuss issues of faith, even ones that might be considered political. They do not loose their right to free speech just because they are churches.
 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
IRS Agrees to Target and Monitor Churches, Because Angry Atheists Demanded It?



The new IRS targeting program has been instituted at the behest of the angry atheist group Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF).

The IRS caved to the same FFRF that has tried, and notoriously failed, to strip “In God We Trust” from our currency, tear down World War II memorials, ban the National Day of Prayer, attack the Star of David in a Holocaust memorial, and even deny that Moses is depicted in the Supreme Court.

FFRF filed a lawsuit against the IRS in 2012 demanding that the Obama Administration delve deep into preaching from the pulpit to ensure that pastors, priests, and parishioners don’t say anything within the four walls of a church that could be construed as political.

Instead of refusing to impose a draconian monitoring program into the free speech of churches, the IRS caved, settling the case and agreeing with the angry atheist group that churches should be targets of federal IRS monitoring. The worst part? The IRS is keeping the details of its settlement, agreeing to target churches, a secret.

As Fox News reported, this deal with the IRS not only violates the First Amendment but could lead to the IRS literally monitoring sermons on Sunday morning and challenging churches’ tax-exempt status if they take a religious position on issues such as abortion.

FFRF responded that these concerns are nothing more than the “hysterical disinformation machine that is Fox News Network.”

Nothing could be further from the truth. This is a real and direct threat to the religious freedom and free speech of churches.

Churches have a constitutionally protected right to discuss issues of faith, even ones that might be considered political. They do not loose their right to free speech just because they are churches.

The Constitution doesn't mean much to this bunch we have in power now.
The Democrats laugh at it , and the Republicans ignore it.
 
Top