The notion that someone who already has the mindset of killing and maiming won't act on it if he doesn't have a gun to do it with is just ridiculous.
Moral Equivalence ... Obama is a Moron, but I repeat myself
Mines Unsafe
Roads Unsafe
SeatBelts
all FIXED with BETTER DESIGNS / Design Improvements
.... did the Firearms FAIL to Function ?
in that case a new design is called for, otherwise the devices functioned as designed - Click - POW
The notion that we should blindly follow this moron is what really doesn't make sense.
His speech provided nothing. No substance, no specific laws or anything that would have prevented this. You know why? Because he chose to jump out and use this as a political stance before getting actual facts. (hence his "This is something we should politicize," statement) At that time, he didn't even know who the person was, so how in the hell can he have any idea if "tougher" background laws would have stopped him?
There's a reason he lacked specific details in his speech...because he has no idea on how to stop these things. He never mentioned the 2A, instead, lumping guns with other random safety issues. He mentioned how many guns are in the country (FYI, the FBI even recognized the surge of gun purchases last year, with a pretty low crime rate considering the sheer number of guns), but no mention on how to make that many guns disappear.
Bottom line, we don't know how the shooter got his weapons, if he was disqualified, or went through a background check, so how can he go on stage and propose "common sense gun legislation" without knowing the details?
Because of people like nhboy.
The notion that someone who already has the mindset of killing and maiming won't act on it if he doesn't have a gun to do it with is just ridiculous.
The problem isn't the guns. The problem is disgruntled, damaged people who can and will come up with other ways of carrying out this mission.
Moral Equivalence ... Obama is a Moron, but I repeat myself
Mines Unsafe
Roads Unsafe
SeatBelts
all FIXED with BETTER DESIGNS / Design Improvements
.... did the Firearms FAIL to Function ?
in that case a new design is called for, otherwise the devices functioned as designed - Click - POW
Okay so lets make their mission harder !!!
The notion that someone who already has the mindset of killing and maiming won't act on it if he doesn't have a gun to do it with is just ridiculous.
The problem isn't the guns. The problem is disgruntled, damaged people who can and will come up with other ways of carrying out this mission.
I am a gun owner and I say let's make it harder for the disgruntled damaged people to kill so easy. Make the crazies come up with those other ways
Thank You for proving what a real phucking asswipe you really are .I always knew it put it helps when you put it out on display like you did in that post.
His speech provided nothing. No substance, no specific laws or anything that would have prevented this. You know why? Because he chose to jump out and use this as a political stance before getting actual facts. (hence his "This is something we should politicize," statement) At that time, he didn't even know who the person was, so how in the hell can he have any idea if "tougher" background laws would have stopped him?
Thank You for proving what a real phucking asswipe you really are .I always knew it put it helps when you put it out on display like you did in that post.
You have a problem with the truth?
Please square that with "...the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
Yes, I know no rights are absolute. However, what would be your criteria that would also not challenge the text above.
I am a gun owner and I say let's make it harder for the disgruntled damaged people to kill so easy. Make the crazies come up with those other ways