Michael Moore/Bill O'Reilly Interview

[Penn]

:shrug: Did anybody see it weds. evening?

O'Reilly put it to Moore, that no less than 4 sources told Pres. Bush and this administration that Iraq had WMDs,(besides the 12 or so years every other nation on the planet was sure they(Saddam) had them.

Plus, it's come out that Amb. Wilson's information about Iraq NOT sending emmisaries to Nigeria to acquire "yellowcake uranium" was totally incorrect. It took place, but where was Wilson?

O'Reilly asked Moore: Do you want to apologize to President Bush now, or later?

The idiot started "spinning" madly, and said "I still think he's a liar".

What an idealogue! UFB..........The hatred people like him display is beyond anything possible, or so I thought.

 

[czygvtwkr]

I didnt watch it, I was torn. I love O'Reilly but hate Michael Moore so much I decided not to watch. I figured that Bill could take care of him without me.

 

[Penn]

Originally posted by czygvtwkr
I didnt watch it, I was torn. I love O'Reilly but hate Michael Moore so much I decided not to watch. I figured that Bill could take care of him without me.

It's only my opinion(and you know what they say about opinions), but I think O'Reilly showed what kind of hateful creature Moore really is.

Moore tried to spin it in asking O'Reilly - repeatedly - "would you send your child off to fight in a war in Iraq, for the reasons given?"

O'Reilly, replied "I" would go if asked, but the point of sending "children" was not the point in question. He constantly tried to "bait" O'Reilly with this question and pizz him off, but Mr. "O" would not rise to Moore's infantile games and raise his temper, thereby playing into Moore's hands.

Moore, I felt never did answer a direct question posed to him, he merely spun like a top, and when he ran out of webbing, he blew out more hot air to his interviewer, trying to obscure his facts, or lack of them. Mostly BS, it seemed.

The guy(Moore) is a total fool.

 

[Toxick]

I didn't see the interview, but there was a partial transcript on O'Reilly's website. It's probalby still up there. I'm fixing dinner, but I'll try and look for it in a bit if noone else finds it.


Basically, there was some sort of deal made between Moore and O'Reilly, like the interview couldn't be edited (I guess to make Moore look bad) and for every question that O'Reilly asked, Moore got to ask one.


I read the transcript, and my impression is that neither of these two men are capable of answering a straight question with a straight answer.

Granted Moore's big question was highly loaded, ("Would you sacrifice your children in this sham of a war?"); and I'm not sure how I would have responded. O'Reilly was trying to get Moore to say that Bush didn't lie but was merely acting on faulty information.

There was a lot of this happening:

O'Reilly: Bush didn't lie, he just had bad intel.

Moore: Right! So he lied.

O'Reilly: It's not a lie if you believe it to be true.

Moore: He said something that wasn't true.

O'Reilly: But he believed it to be true.

Moore: But it wasn't.

O'Reilly: Yeah, but that's not a lie

Moore: Yes it is.

O'Reilly:No it isn't.

Moore: Yes it is.


I stopped reading about 3/4 of the way through the thing.

 

[Penn]

Originally posted by Toxick
I didn't see the interview, but there was a partial transcript on O'Reilly's website. It's probalby still up there. I'm fixing dinner, but I'll try and look for it in a bit if noone else finds it.


Basically, there was some sort of deal made between Moore and O'Reilly, like the interview couldn't be edited (I guess to make Moore look bad) and for every question that O'Reilly asked, Moore got to ask one.


I stopped reading about 3/4 of the way through the thing.

I've always liked O'Reilly. Sometimes he can be somewhat obnoxious, but most of the time he's right on.

DO NOT try to come on his program and try to"spin" your way out of a touchy issue. After about 15 seconds, he recognises it for what it is and will say "hold it, that is not what we're talking about here", or "I asked you a question, and now you're giving me answers to another sticking point"..they don't equate to the original topic.

You caught the gibberish Moore was trying to spin with here, and it didn't wash.

If you would, go back over my posts here in this thread again, and see what O'Reilly laid out before him; no, it's not word for word, but the gist of it is accurate, I think.

This guy, like so many other leftists can not get past the red that they see through their eyes when they think of George Bush; that is what it comes down to, as I look at it.

 

[Toxick]

Originally posted by penncam
You caught the gibberish Moore was trying to spin with here, and it didn't wash.

Indeed I did. I've never thought Moore was anything but a spin doctoring, propagandist weasel.

And I knew that getting him to admit that he's wrong, mistaken or being misleading would be as easy as putting lipstick on a rattlesnake.

Originally posted by penncam
If you would, go back over my posts here in this thread again, and see what O'Reilly laid out before him; no, it's not word for word, but the gist of it is accurate, I think.

I saw it. And if I had read yours before I wrote mine, I wouldn't have written it, because you nailed it.

 

[Spoiled]

Im not a big moore fan, but im not be any stretch an oreily fan... but i did want to watch this one... unfortunatly i had prior obligations (work) that kept me from doing so (me and my infinite wisdom didnt tape it either)... From what i have seen oreily does add his own spin to things, and makes up facts... he also seems like a bully to me... often times it seems like he is almost like me trying to make a point to my friends they just start yelling and calling me a "liberal piece of sh%t" and they dont have a point, they just wont let me get mine across... When they are beat they just resort to personal attack or ignore it...

 

[Penn]

Originally posted by Spoiled
.. often times it seems like he is almost like me - trying to make a point to my friends(and) they just start yelling and calling me a "liberal piece of sh%t".. ...

Well, do you suppose there's any truth to this description they've so aptly labeled you with?

 

[Penn]

Truer words were never spoken

Originally posted by Toxick
Indeed I did. I've never thought Moore was anything but a spin doctoring, propagandist weasel.

And I knew that getting him to admit that he's wrong, mistaken or being misleading would be as easy as putting lipstick on a rattlesnake.

Hmmm. I never tried to put lispstick on a rattlesnake.

That's priceless!

 

[Pete]

Originally posted by Spoiled
When they are beat they just resort to personal attack or ignore it...

U meen like nit pickin spelling and such? I a gree

 

[sleuth]

The entire interview (in video!) is posted here

Just click on the video tab on that little box in the story.

 

[Spoiled]

Well, do you suppose there's any truth to this description they've so aptly labeled you with?

Regardless, i atleast have facts to base my political beliefs on... When they are unable to refute those facts and refer to me a such then its a moot issue, because they cant say otherwise....

Originally posted by Pete
U meen like nit pickin spelling and such? I a gree

No like calling me a jackass, pussy, hippie, ######.... I mean i do sit there and write out all my arguments with my friends... oh wait...

 

[FromTexas]

Yes, I always love how its parents everywhere who CHOOSE to send their children off. The children never make these CHOICES on their OWN.

In some socialist countries, the children are REQUIRED too. Again, thats the way Michael Moore would like it so it is "EQUAL".

I prefer choice for my children whether it is something I approve of when they become an adult or not.

 

[Spoiled]

Originally posted by FromTexas
Yes, I always love how its parents everywhere who CHOOSE to send their children off. The children never make these CHOICES on their OWN.

In some socialist countries, the children are REQUIRED too. Again, thats the way Michael Moore would like it so it is "EQUAL".

I prefer choice for my children whether it is something I approve of when they become an adult or not.

Its not the parents choice, and thats what he is saying.... because both of them said they didnt want to, as im sure the majority of their fellow americans would agree.... His point is that bush is sending THEIR children there, where he would be reluctant to send his OWN...

 

[Toxick]

Originally posted by FromTexas
Yes, I always love how its parents everywhere who CHOOSE to send their children off. The children never make these CHOICES on their OWN.

I like how these brave men and women are constantly referred to as "kids" and "children".


Yeah, they're someone's children. But they are not children.

As far as I know, the US Military doesn't allow children to join.



It's an effective, but misleading emotional ploy.

And it's lame-city.

 

[FromTexas]

Originally posted by Toxick
I like how these brave men and women are constantly referred to as "kids" and "children".


Yeah, they're someone's children. But they are not children.

As far as I know, the US Military doesn't allow children to join.



It's an effective, but misleading emotional ploy.

And it's lame-city.

I agree.

 

[FromTexas]

Originally posted by Spoiled
Its not the parents choice, and thats what he is saying.... because both of them said they didnt want to, as im sure the majority of their fellow americans would agree.... His point is that bush is sending THEIR children there, where he would be reluctant to send his OWN...

Who said Bush would be reluctant to send his own? ITS NOT HIS CHOICE TO SEND HIS OWN! Wake up to the reality of that. Besides, his twins would just fall over the enemy drunk and stick out their tongues at them.

Actually, O'Reilly never said he wouldn't send his children there. He said he would go himself. He did not make choices for his children. I also have a laugh at Michael Moore saying he would put himself in harms way if he believed in the threat.

 

[rraley]

Michael Moore does not think quick on his feet like O'Reilly; I thought that Moore made a fool of himself.

 

[Penn]

Originally posted by rraley
Michael Moore does not think quick on his feet like O'Reilly; I thought that Moore made a fool of himself.

And that, my friends is the most telling of all. rraley is a middle-of-the-road liberal, and even he can see the truth for what it is.

Methinks Michael Moore has a lot of hate in his heart and soul.
With that much stuck inside there, seething, stewing and boiling below the surface, it makes you wonder what his private moments are like.

You all know, when you wake yourselves up in the morning, you eventually go to the mirror; what does this guy see?

OR, is it all a scam on Moore's behalf, that maybe even he does not believe a third of the BS he spews?

Either way, he's not a pretty sight to behold.

 

[soul4sale]

Originally posted by penncam
Did anybody see it weds. evening?

I missed it!? That's popcorn worthy - two of the most self-absorbed politcal loudmouths in the same barbed-wire electrified cage match of DEATH!

No cage? Not even barbed wire?

OK, nevermind, phuck it.