So, there is this post on facebook....

GregV814

Well-Known Member
about the "hammer about to fall on Loretta Lynch to indict Hillary, ... or else".

A warm & fuzzy feeling. But what is the "or else" ? What are they going to do, appoint her to the Supreme Court if she doesn't?



OOOOOooooooooo....
 

crabcake

But wait, there's more...
The whole lot of 'em (including her predecessor) needs to be tossed into a cell at Gitmo, and the key thrown in the ocean.
 

LibertyBeacon

Unto dust we shall return
about the "hammer about to fall on Loretta Lynch to indict Hillary, ... or else".

A warm & fuzzy feeling. But what is the "or else" ? What are they going to do, appoint her to the Supreme Court if she doesn't?



OOOOOooooooooo....

Nothing like that warm & fuzzy feeling of being stoned in the morning, eh Greggy?

I think you should share.
 

tommyjo

New Member
Sounds like something Obama would submit.
How about Eric Holder?

Hell: Why not Reggie Love?

Um...moron...does the name Harriet Myers mean anything to you? Probably doesn't...go look it up.

Additionally...here are the bios of the two individuals Mr. Obama has nominated to the Supreme Court:


Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice,
was born in Bronx, New York, on June 25, 1954. She earned a B.A. in 1976 from Princeton University, graduating summa cum laude and receiving the university's highest academic honor. In 1979, she earned a J.D. from Yale Law School where she served as an editor of the Yale Law Journal. She served as Assistant District Attorney in the New York County District Attorney's Office from 1979–1984. She then litigated international commercial matters in New York City at Pavia & Harcourt, where she served as an associate and then partner from 1984–1992. In 1991, President George H.W. Bush nominated her to the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, and she served in that role from 1992–1998. She served as a judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit from 1998–2009. President Barack Obama nominated her as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court on May 26, 2009, and she assumed this role August 8, 2009.


Elena Kagan, Associate Justice,
was born in New York, New York, on April 28, 1960. She received an A.B. from Princeton in 1981, an M. Phil. from Oxford in 1983, and a J.D. from Harvard Law School in 1986. She clerked for Judge Abner Mikva of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit from 1986-1987 and for Justice Thurgood Marshall of the U.S. Supreme Court during the 1987 Term. After briefly practicing law at a Washington, D.C. law firm, she became a law professor, first at the University of Chicago Law School and later at Harvard Law School. She also served for four years in the Clinton Administration, as Associate Counsel to the President and then as Deputy Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy. Between 2003 and 2009, she served as the Dean of Harvard Law School. In 2009, President Obama nominated her as the Solicitor General of the United States. A year later, the President nominated her as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court on May 10, 2010. She took her seat on August 7, 2010.
 

TheLibertonian

New Member
yeah, we need more lesbian left of center democrats ....yup, yesireeee Bob...

What does their sexual orientation have to do with their ability as judges?

What we need is people not from New York and Harvard. Let's get some southwesterners into the court. Surely there are judges and lawyers from that part of the country who are more then qualified.
 

itsbob

I bowl overhand
What does their sexual orientation have to do with their ability as judges?

What we need is people not from New York and Harvard. Let's get some southwesterners into the court. Surely there are judges and lawyers from that part of the country who are more then qualified.

I like that.. Middle America, mid west America needs representation as well. Not just the inner city perspective of what laws pertain to the citizens.
 
Last edited:

TheLibertonian

New Member
I like that.. Middle America, mis west Ameri a.needs representation as well. Not hust the inner city perspective of what laws pertain to the citizens.

I think it's far more important then their religion or their sexual orientation. Where we're from is a much bigger factor on how we see the world IMO.
 
Top