So what branch of the military did Hillary serve in?
No one cares.
Apparently it's a salient point to the original writer.No one cares.
Why does this upset you? It is the same 3rd grade mentality that Mr. Trump uses. In fact, Mr. Trump (you know the ACTUAL CANDIDATE) has used all those words but one--traitor--to describe his opponents in the primary and now general election. And he came damn close to calling John McCain a traitor with his asinine comments back in the fall.
What is your problem with this? It isn't any worse than what is posted on here on a daily basis. It is the world sites like this and freaky fringe people have created. Hell, the board mommy expresses sentiment worse than what is in that letter.[/QUOTE
I care less about the name calling. Not the point of my post. Please provide a link where Trump said hillary (or any other potential candidate) was not qualified because they hadn't serve in the military I'll wait..........
Why does this upset you? It is the same 3rd grade mentality that Mr. Trump uses. In fact, Mr. Trump (you know the ACTUAL CANDIDATE) has used all those words but one--traitor--to describe his opponents in the primary and now general election. And he came damn close to calling John McCain a traitor with his asinine comments back in the fall.
What is your problem with this? It isn't any worse than what is posted on here on a daily basis. It is the world sites like this and freaky fringe people have created. Hell, the board mommy expresses sentiment worse than what is in that letter.[/QUOTE
I care less about the name calling. Not the point of my post. Please provide a link where Trump said hillary (or any other potential candidate) was not qualified because they hadn't serve in the military I'll wait..........
I don't think anyone was upset, about this only astounded at the stupidity of the dingbat who wrote it.
What Branch did Obama serve in.
you seem to be a little slow. This is one of the points brought out in the article "He has never served in the military and therefore would not be qualified to serve as the United States commander-in-chief". It's not a good point and shows that the writer (a Hillary supporter) doesn't know much about about a whole lot of (most) previous presidents.Why do you care?
Why do you care?
Why did you bother to ask?
I 'm curious as to why someone's service in the military matters to you?
This is one of the points brought out in the article "He has never served in the military and therefore would not be qualified to serve as the United States commander-in-chief".