Are Global Warming Alarmists Disappointed Hurricane Matthew Wasn't Worse?

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
Are Global Warming Alarmists Disappointed Hurricane Matthew Wasn't Worse?


Chicago mayor and Clinton crony Rahm Emanuel famously said to never let a crisis go to waste in politics. In the case of Hurricane Matthew, some political operatives and global warming true believers might have wanted the crisis to be worse than it was. It would be consistent with their history.

Hurricane Matthew killed at least 30 Americans and more than 1,000 in total. Damage is estimated to be at least $5 billion.

But apparently that's not enough death and destruction for the alarmists.

Before Matthew made landfall Saturday in South Carolina, it had been more than 4,000 days since the last hurricane hit the U.S. That's 10 years, 11 months and about a week.

The alarmists were itching for a large-scale disaster because every day that went by without a hurricane, especially an epic one, meant that their predictions than man-made global warming was going to cause more and bigger storms was another day that made them look like the cons and hopelessly conned that they are.
 

b23hqb

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
Of course they are. Same as the meteorologists who always are disappointed when are forced to admit it was not as destructive as predicted, and did not make a direct hit to cause the massive damage they delight in reporting of.
 
I'm always curious to know how come the Climatic Henny Pennys never mention or try to explain how the worst temperature swings, snowfalls, earthquakes, typhoons, hurricanes, etc. on record happened way back before the technology boom really boomed.
 
Top