Noam Chomsky: 'The Republican Party Has Become the Most Dangerous Organization in World History'

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
Noam Chomsky: 'The Republican Party Has Become the Most Dangerous Organization in World History'


On Nov. 8, Donald Trump managed to pull the biggest upset in U.S. politics by tapping successfully into the anger of white voters and appealing to the lowest inclinations of people in a manner that would have probably impressed Nazi propagandist Joseph Goebbels himself.

But what exactly does Trump's victory mean and what can one expect from this megalomaniac when he takes over the reins of power on Jan. 20, 2017? What is Trump's political ideology, if any and is "Trumpism" a movement? Will U.S. foreign policy be any different under a Trump administration? Some years ago, public intellectual Noam Chomsky warned that the political climate in the U.S. was ripe for the rise of an authoritarian figure. Now, he shares his thoughts on the aftermath of this election, the moribund state of the U.S. political system and why Trump is a real threat to the world and the planet in general.

[clip]

During the Republican primaries, every candidate denied that what is happening is happening—with the exception of the sensible moderates, like Jeb Bush, who said it's all uncertain, but we don't have to do anything because we're producing more natural gas, thanks to fracking. Or John Kasich, who agreed that global warming is taking place, but added that "we are going to burn [coal] in Ohio and we are not going to apologize for it."

The winning candidate, now the president-elect, calls for rapid increase in use of fossil fuels, including coal; dismantling of regulations; rejection of help to developing countries that are seeking to move to sustainable energy; and in general, racing to the cliff as fast as possible.

Trump has already taken steps to dismantle the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) by placing in charge of the EPA transition a notorious (and proud) climate change denier, Myron Ebell. Trump's top adviser on energy, billionaire oil executive Harold Hamm, announced his expectations, which were predictable: dismantling regulations, tax cuts for the industry (and the wealthy and corporate sector generally), more fossil fuel production, lifting Obama's temporary block on the Dakota Access Pipeline.
 

Lurk

Happy Creepy Ass Cracka
Trump has already taken steps to dismantle the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) by placing in charge of the EPA transition a notorious (and proud) climate change denier, Myron Ebell. Trump's top adviser on energy, billionaire oil executive Harold Hamm, announced his expectations, which were predictable: dismantling regulations, tax cuts for the industry (and the wealthy and corporate sector generally), more fossil fuel production, lifting Obama's temporary block on the Dakota Access Pipeline.

Already sounds like a positive direction to be taking the nation.
 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
Already sounds like a positive direction to be taking the nation.

The man is 87 years old. One would think he was too old to be so butt hurt.

I guess that is something Lefties never grow out of.
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
The man is 87 years old. One would think he was too old to be so butt hurt.

I guess that is something Lefties never grow out of.

Noam Chomsky is Soros without the money. He's not brainwashed, he's one of the washers.
 

Larry Gude

Strung Out
Already sounds like a positive direction to be taking the nation.

Why? Energy is already reasonably cheap. Doing any of this will help normal folks but it will destabilize Russia and mexic, hurt Canada and make the middle east an even larger mess. Venezuela anyone? Energy was to high in cost. It was bad for the nation and the world. Too low is bad as well. Wanna end fracking? Make coal too cheap to ignore.
 

Lurk

Happy Creepy Ass Cracka
Why? Energy is already reasonably cheap. Doing any of this will help normal folks but it will destabilize Russia and mexic, hurt Canada and make the middle east an even larger mess. Venezuela anyone? Energy was to high in cost. It was bad for the nation and the world. Too low is bad as well. Wanna end fracking? Make coal too cheap to ignore.

For the simple reason (and this is a major reason Trump is the President-elect) that it means a beginning of the culling of useless and economy-dampening regulations. It might even lead (hope, hope) to elimination of most of the EPA.
 

Larry Gude

Strung Out
For the simple reason (and this is a major reason Trump is the President-elect) that it means a beginning of the culling of useless and economy-dampening regulations. It might even lead (hope, hope) to elimination of most of the EPA.

And, as I say, then what? I can only guess you're a contractor. What are you, and $6 trillion worth of other people going to do? Go build airports? The economy does NOT work by cutting spending.

It would probably be really helpful if people stopped looking at the federal gummint as the kitchen table economy. Individuals can cut here, save there, and do well for themselves. That said, for the vast majority of us, that's a static environment; you have a job and you have your bills. There is NO case where YOU spending helps your overall income. The federal gummint is a totally different animal. Reagan could spend like a mad man, and in context of his era, he did. The economy took off and taxes to the treasury came pouring in. Obama hasn't done very well here. His spending hasn't generated much other action.
 
Top