You're being extreme for the sake of making a point. We're talking so called 'fake' news. I hadn't even heard of this pizza joint so, I'm not even going to consider that because some obscure posting seen by only 500,000 people or so is not relevant when we're talking well over 100 million voters and their behavior.
In terms of relevant issues, it is 'fake' news to claim Bush lied about WMD. And it is also true. It is also biased. It is fake news to claim Obama isn't a US citizen. It is also true and it is also biased.
It the purest of terms, Bush did lie. Others would call it messaging the information. Clearly, when some report writer is all but told the boss wants the thing to read a certain way that is both lying and bias. Both fake and true. It is true that, in some contexts, the birth certificate wasn't clear cut. It's a flat out lie to blame then genesis of the issue on Trump. That said, in a certain context, it is true. It is certainly biased.
It is fake news to report that the administration says a spontaneous riot sparked by some video online somewhere, seen by handfuls of people, is responsible for the Benghazi battle. It is also true and it is also biased. Any reporter worth a damn, as well as their editors, knew, at the time, that story was bull ####. However, when it comes from the WH and they can probably find someone somewhere who can produce a FB posting about how 'angry' they were over the video, you report what the WH says. Then, your reporting engages in bias as to how it COULD be true. That said, it is every bit as much fake news as it is to say Bush is a reptilian alien. The media has been alluding to Trump being Hitler for months. This is fake news, profoundly, clearly. However, there are SOME traits that are similar and, thus, COULD be sorta Hitlerian. As for Bush, if you buy that we are all, at core, star dust, and we are, Bush has alien characteristics, as do we all. If you're arguing he has all these super powers to make 9/11 an inside job, made the weather bad in NOLA, it's all of a kind.
Fake news, for our purposes here, has to be close enough to sell suckers. That happens ALL the time in biased reporting. Two sides of the same coin. It is simply crazy to think Bill Clinton had something to do with the Mena airport and CIA drug running in Arkansas in the 80's but, over time, it looks like he was, at the very least, aware of it. It seems crazy to argue Bush 41 jumped on an SR71 as Reagan's veep and met with Iranian functionaries to get them to keep the hostages until Reagan took office but, really, is that totally our of the realm of possibilities? No. There is SOME evidence to suggest it. Same with Vince Foster. Same with the Obama gay sex stories, same with the Skull and Crossbones stuff at Yale, same with a lot of stories that, at one point or other, either were called fake or ended up being so. I heard that Muslim cabbies were told to stay away from the towers that morning, before the attacks. I also heard some Jews were told the same thing. I heard bombs were found in the Lincoln tunnel. Hell, lots of people STILL can't accept that Lee Harvey Oswald was just a kook that FBI and CIA knew about, considered harmless and then killed the President of the United States of America and that all of the cover up was to COVER UP that we DID know. And didn't think he was a real threat. Oliver Stone's JFK is as fake as possible BUT could be considered simply profoundly biased given the cover up. Same thing has happened all over again with 9/11.
For our purposes here, fake and bias should be considered synonymous.