The Women’s March has double the attendance of Trump’s inauguration

[nhboy]

" President Donald Trump really likes to marvel at the size of the crowds at his events as a way to show himself support. He has said that there would be an “unbelievable, perhaps record-setting turnout” at his inauguration.

That didn’t happen.

Instead, his inauguration events were relatively sparsely attended, especially in comparison to former President Barack Obama’s first inauguration in 2009. About 250,000 people showed up to support Trump, according to crowd count estimates.

Early projections say that twice as many people showed up to protest Trump at Saturday’s Women’s March on Washington. An estimated 500,000 people attended the rally on the day after Trump’s inauguration. "

https://thinkprogress.org/womens-march-outnumber-trump-inauguration-e5659e80e7c4#.7mxtzly30

 

[Hijinx]

" President Donald Trump really likes to marvel at the size of the crowds at his events as a way to show himself support. He has said that there would be an “unbelievable, perhaps record-setting turnout” at his inauguration.

That didn’t happen.

Instead, his inauguration events were relatively sparsely attended, especially in comparison to former President Barack Obama’s first inauguration in 2009. About 250,000 people showed up to support Trump, according to crowd count estimates.

Early projections say that twice as many people showed up to protest Trump at Saturday’s Women’s March on Washington. An estimated 500,000 people attended the rally on the day after Trump’s inauguration. "

https://thinkprogress.org/womens-march-outnumber-trump-inauguration-e5659e80e7c4#.7mxtzly30

Should have been called Feminist march or liberal women's march. It certainly does not convey the feeling of all women.
In fact they refused to allow pro life women the right to march with them.

 

[tommyjo]

Should have been called Feminist march or liberal women's march. It certainly does not convey the feeling of all women.
In fact they refused to allow pro life women the right to march with them.

Let's say your interpretation is correct...some women were excluded who would have attended....then the crowds protesting Mr. Trump would have been LARGER! As our illustrious new President said..."the world is watching"...yes they are...they are laughing at us, shaking their heads in disbelief or scheming to see who will be first to take advantage of the unqualified egoist we put in charge.

BTW...where were all you raving Trump supporters yesterday...the turnout on the Mall for the actual inaugural was appalling...

 

[Bird Dog]

BTW...where were all you raving Trump supporters yesterday...the turnout on the Mall for the actual inaugural was appalling...

We are smart enough to come in out of the rain.......dipwad.....and most of us still have jobs

 

[SamSpade]

BTW...where were all you raving Trump supporters yesterday...the turnout on the Mall for the actual inaugural was appalling...

Just means the stupid runs even deeper.

Please - what are they even protesting? The repeal of Roe v. Wade? Make you an easy bet - never gonna happen.
In my lifetime.

The "War on Women"? Fighting for Reproductive Rights? Nothing's gonna happen.

These are people pissed off because they lost. It's a giant tantrum. Celebrities largely cursing and making crude remarks.
I know - I have nieces and cousins and relatives there - they have always hated Republicans and they believe ridiculous conspiracy theories.
They believe BUSH blew up the WTC. They believe a missile hit the Pentagon.
There are nitwits who believe he will try to invalidate their gay marriage (Bet number 2 - never, ever going to happen, nor does Trump even HINT that).

So what are they basing it on? A remark he made privately that became public. *I'VE* said *worse* - privately. Clinton has DONE worse.

My niece, her friends, my cousins - walking around with crude comments on their shirts. I've long given up discussing politics with them, because their knowledge is even weaker than your estimation of the dumbest right-wing person here.

 

[Bann]

Should have been called Feminist march or liberal women's march. It certainly does not convey the feeling of all women.
In fact they refused to allow pro life women the right to march with them.

 

[Bann]

Let's say your interpretation is correct...some women were excluded who would have attended....then the crowds protesting Mr. Trump would have been LARGER! As our illustrious new President said..."the world is watching"...yes they are...they are laughing at us, shaking their heads in disbelief or scheming to see who will be first to take advantage of the unqualified egoist we put in charge.

BTW...where were all you raving Trump supporters yesterday...the turnout on the Mall for the actual inaugural was appalling...

It was plenty crowded from where I stood. If there were less people than in other inauguarations, I could care less. I got to attend.

In retrospect, now that I've been there done that - I can stay home and be comfy,m knowing I can see much better from my living room.

 

[edinsomd]

"The Women’s March has double the attendance of Trump’s inauguration"

And the point?

 

[Hijinx]

Let's say your interpretation is correct...some women were excluded who would have attended....then the crowds protesting Mr. Trump would have been LARGER! As our illustrious new President said..."the world is watching"...yes they are...they are laughing at us, shaking their heads in disbelief or scheming to see who will be first to take advantage of the unqualified egoist we put in charge.

BTW...where were all you raving Trump supporters yesterday...the turnout on the Mall for the actual inaugural was appalling...

You are wrong Hon. The world isn't laughing at us, they are laughing at you silly assed liberals.
Shaking their heads at the stupidity of people who try to interfere in the legal and Constitutional process of transferring power.

And don't lets just say my interpretation is correct it is. Just a pack of silly dykes, feminists and baby killers.
There are thousands of them as you saw.

Next week is the March for Life rally. They will have real women there.

 

[Hijinx]

It was plenty crowded from where I stood. If there were less people than in other inauguarations, I could care less. I got to attend.

In retrospect, now that I've been there done that - I can stay home and be comfy,m knowing I can see much better from my living room.

LMAO Like Football and Nascar, I found that out a while ago. But all experiences are good.

 

[GURPS]

ah yes the numbers game .... ok so what



a women's screech fest had more attendees


..... SO WHAT

 

[Monello]

a women's screech fest had more attendees


..... SO WHAT

ANd left a big mess. I guess not many greenies in the bunch. I pity the people that have to clean up after these slobs.

 

[Kyle]

 

[Kyle]

 

[Bann]

ANd left a big mess. I guess not many greenies in the bunch. I pity the people that have to clean up after these slobs.

<img src="http://forums.somd.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=116820"/>

Omg, I didn't see anything like that on Jan. 20th!!

 

[Bann]

On our way back to the Metro, same way we came in. No layers of trash!

 

[black dog]

Let's say your interpretation is correct...some women were excluded who would have attended....then the crowds protesting Mr. Trump would have been LARGER! As our illustrious new President said..."the world is watching"...yes they are...they are laughing at us, shaking their heads in disbelief or scheming to see who will be first to take advantage of the unqualified egoist we put in charge.

BTW...where were all you raving Trump supporters yesterday...the turnout on the Mall for the actual inaugural was appalling...

I enjoyed the fact when any reporter would interview a protester of either sex they couldn't even say in a complete sentence on why they were actually there, or just pelt the reporter with eggs and or verbal threats.
It seems that every village idiot in America is protesting lots of perceived threats, that will never come to light.

 

[Kyle]

I enjoyed the fact when any reporter would interview a protester of either sex they couldn't even say in a complete sentence on why they were actually there, or just pelt the reporter with eggs and or verbal threats.
It seems that every village idiot in America is protesting lots of perceived threats, that will never come to light.

After watching several of these interviews on CNN, MSNBC, Fox and the big three, I can't even tell you that they were one of the two sexes.

They seem to have found a vast assortment of psychedelic freaks.

 

[black dog]

View attachment 116824

Excellent.. I'm stealing that sir.