DannyMotorcycle
Active Member
something like...
oh yea we did..
the gist i seem to recall was... that if it passes, developers can't build on it or some crap...
what was it though, only 1 house per 1 or 3 acres?
I just saw someone on facebook saying his family owned 30 acres for 150 years or something?
and he is unhappy that it won't be able to have houses put up for the tons of kids and grandkids?
(in indian head)
seems like it was lose/lose.. either way they'll claim property values are higher and tax more?
I think less people seems like a better idea to me... so that's good i don't feel any need to contest it i think..
oh yea we did..
the gist i seem to recall was... that if it passes, developers can't build on it or some crap...
what was it though, only 1 house per 1 or 3 acres?
I just saw someone on facebook saying his family owned 30 acres for 150 years or something?
and he is unhappy that it won't be able to have houses put up for the tons of kids and grandkids?
(in indian head)
seems like it was lose/lose.. either way they'll claim property values are higher and tax more?
I think less people seems like a better idea to me... so that's good i don't feel any need to contest it i think..