Snowflake Rubio

Rommey

Rommey

Well-Known Member
There's a lot of congress critters, from both sides of the aisle, that are avoiding town halls. When the town halls are reduced to a crowd acting like an unruly group, then what purpose does it serve? If people are there only to disrupt and not actually get answers or legitimately interact, then why should the congress critter give them a stage? There is no upside to having to combat people deliberately disrupting an event.
 
K

Kev_Russell

New Member
Rommey said:
There's a lot of congress critters, from both sides of the aisle, that are avoiding town halls. When the town halls are reduced to a crowd acting like an unruly group, then what purpose does it serve? If people are there only to disrupt and not actually get answers or legitimately interact, then why should the congress critter give them a stage? There is no upside to having to combat people deliberately disrupting an event.
Click to expand...

When that is your job's #2 priority (the #1 being begging for money daily) it doesn't matter if there "is no upside". It just comes with the territory and if you can't handle it: resign.

This ain't rocket surgery.
 
Bird Dog

Bird Dog

Bird Dog
PREMO Member
Kev_Russell said:
When that is your job's #2 priority (the #1 being begging for money daily) it doesn't matter if there "is no upside". It just comes with the territory and if you can't handle it: resign.

This ain't rocket surgery.
Click to expand...

#3....sucking off the government titty like you....
 
ginwoman

ginwoman

Well-Known Member
Rommey said:
There's a lot of congress critters, from both sides of the aisle, that are avoiding town halls. When the town halls are reduced to a crowd acting like an unruly group, then what purpose does it serve? If people are there only to disrupt and not actually get answers or legitimately interact, then why should the congress critter give them a stage? There is no upside to having to combat people deliberately disrupting an event.
Click to expand...

perfectly stated
 
DipStick

DipStick

Keep Calm and Don't Care!
Rommey said:
There's a lot of congress critters, from both sides of the aisle, that are avoiding town halls. When the town halls are reduced to a crowd acting like an unruly group, then what purpose does it serve? If people are there only to disrupt and not actually get answers or legitimately interact, then why should the congress critter give them a stage? There is no upside to having to combat people deliberately disrupting an event.
Click to expand...

Like 2009?
 
Merlin99

Merlin99

Visualize whirled peas
PREMO Member
Kev_Russell said:
When that is your job's #2 priority (the #1 being begging for money daily) it doesn't matter if there "is no upside". It just comes with the territory and if you can't handle it: resign.

This ain't rocket surgery.
Click to expand...
Well since you don't know the job, we're going to give your opinion a big old pass.
 
Rommey

Rommey

Well-Known Member
Kev_Russell said:
When that is your job's #2 priority (the #1 being begging for money daily) it doesn't matter if there "is no upside". It just comes with the territory and if you can't handle it: resign.

This ain't rocket surgery.
Click to expand...
So, if a Senator has a town hall to discuss constituent concerns and there is a portion of the crowd (possibly not even constituents) shouting down the Senator and not allowing discussion about those concerns, then it is a rather fruitless exercise in futility. Let's face it there's a certain portion of the citizenry that doesn't understand that shouting down someone they may disagree with is not always acceptable in normal situations. I'm not saying that elected representatives should be placed on a pedestal, but there should be a certain amount of decorum when interacting with them.
 
vraiblonde

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
The simple solution would be to toss out agitators, and if they don't go quietly have them arrested. What's so hard about that?
 
littlelady

littlelady

God bless the USA
vraiblonde said:
The simple solution would be to toss out agitators, and if they don't go quietly have them arrested. What's so hard about that?
Click to expand...

It seems to come down to that free speech thingy. But, the left doesn't believe in free speech, unless they are the ones free 'speeching'. Hypocrisy, anyone?
 
Last edited:
PsyOps

PsyOps

Pixelated
Kev_Russell said:
Man up little guy. It's not like anyone is asking you to actually work.

Waaaah. They're gonna call me mean names!

http://www.politico.com/states/florida/story/2017/02/marco-rubio-town-halls-109889
Click to expand...

Just so I understand... Because a bunch sniveling, juvenile, 'snowflakes' didn't get their way this last election, they're going throw a temper tantrum at every GOP town hall; this makes Rubio the snowflake?

Given what we've seen from you, I can understand how you'd come to that twisted logic.
 
Last edited:
Merlin99

Merlin99

Visualize whirled peas
PREMO Member
PsyOps said:
Just so I understand... Because a bunch sniveling, juvenile, 'snowflakes' didn't get their way this last election, so they're going throw a temper tantrum at every GOP town hall; this makes Rubio the snowflake?

Given what we've seen from you, I can understand how you'd come to that twisted logic.
Click to expand...

"We have a basic human right to whine and damned if you're not going to listen"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top