If You Die on the Job, Your Boss Can Now Skip the Paperwork

nhboy

Ubi bene ibi patria
" The many joys of Republican governance.

The folks at Camp Runamuck, and their auxiliary down at the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue, have yet another present for those economically insecure folks who didn't want the lady to replace the black guy because Mexicans and ISIS and telling-it-like-it-is. And economic insecurity. You can die on the job now and not burden your boss with unnecessary paperwork.

From The Washington Post:
In a narrow result that divided along party lines, the Senate voted 49 to 48 to eliminate the regulation, dubbed the Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces rule. Finalized in August and blocked by a court order in October, the rule would limit the ability of companies with recent safety problems to complete for government contracts unless they agreed to remedies. The measure to abolish it had already cleared the House. The next step after the Senate vote will be the White House, where Trump is expected to sign it.

A half-dozen other worker safety regulations are in Republican crosshairs, with one headed to the Senate floor as soon as this week. Many are directed at companies with federal contracts. Such companies employ 1 in 5 American workers — meaning the effort could have wide-ranging effects.


As you can imagine, there's a truly horrible real-life adventure involved here.

That concern prompted the Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces regulation. Among the strongest data points: Rodney Bridgett, 37, a worker at a Tysons Foods beef processing plant in Nebraska, was crushed by a piece of heavy equipment when a chain snapped on the plant's "kill floor" in 2012. Tyson spokesman Worth Sparkman called Bridgett's death "a tragic accident" and said the company aspires to "have zero work-related injuries and illnesses, and continue to improve our culture related to safety every day." OSHA investigators found that Tysons supervisors had repeatedly failed to inspect the faulty chain.

While OSHA sought to fine the company, the Obama administration moved separately to target a major source of Tysons's revenue: nearly $300 million a year in federal contracts. "

http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a53695/worker-safety-republicans/
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
“They define violations to include mere allegations and citations where the contractors haven’t had a chance to defend them,”


mere allegations .... nothing proven by testimony or an inspection
 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
" The many joys of Republican governance.

The folks at Camp Runamuck, and their auxiliary down at the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue, have yet another present for those economically insecure folks who didn't want the lady to replace the black guy because Mexicans and ISIS and telling-it-like-it-is. And economic insecurity. You can die on the job now and not burden your boss with unnecessary paperwork.

From The Washington Post:
In a narrow result that divided along party lines, the Senate voted 49 to 48 to eliminate the regulation, dubbed the Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces rule. Finalized in August and blocked by a court order in October, the rule would limit the ability of companies with recent safety problems to complete for government contracts unless they agreed to remedies. The measure to abolish it had already cleared the House. The next step after the Senate vote will be the White House, where Trump is expected to sign it.

A half-dozen other worker safety regulations are in Republican crosshairs, with one headed to the Senate floor as soon as this week. Many are directed at companies with federal contracts. Such companies employ 1 in 5 American workers — meaning the effort could have wide-ranging effects.


As you can imagine, there's a truly horrible real-life adventure involved here.

That concern prompted the Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces regulation. Among the strongest data points: Rodney Bridgett, 37, a worker at a Tysons Foods beef processing plant in Nebraska, was crushed by a piece of heavy equipment when a chain snapped on the plant's "kill floor" in 2012. Tyson spokesman Worth Sparkman called Bridgett's death "a tragic accident" and said the company aspires to "have zero work-related injuries and illnesses, and continue to improve our culture related to safety every day." OSHA investigators found that Tysons supervisors had repeatedly failed to inspect the faulty chain.

While OSHA sought to fine the company, the Obama administration moved separately to target a major source of Tysons's revenue: nearly $300 million a year in federal contracts. "

http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a53695/worker-safety-republicans/

Must be owned by Republicans. Obama would never try to screw Democrats like that and he really never gave a damn about safety for workers.
 

Gilligan

#*! boat!
PREMO Member
Awesome!!!!! Now..only about two thousand more utter bs FARs to get rid of. Morons like the boy have no idea...
 

tommyjo

New Member
“They define violations to include mere allegations and citations where the contractors haven’t had a chance to defend them,”


mere allegations .... nothing proven by testimony or an inspection

Here are the full two paragraphs that include the one sentence you cherry picked and removed from context....

ABC and other business groups objected to the rule’s requirement that companies disclose citations for alleged safety violations that they are still challenging.

“They define violations to include mere allegations and citations where the contractors haven’t had a chance to defend them,” said Marc Freedman, executive director of labor law policy with the Chamber. “We consider this a violation of their constitutional due-process rights.”

Now go back and read that again so you can understand the proper context...which is COMPLETELY different from your inane cut and past attempt.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
“They define violations to include mere allegations and citations where the contractors haven’t had a chance to defend them,” said Marc Freedman, executive director of labor law policy with the Chamber. “We consider this a violation of their constitutional due-process rights.”

Now go back and read that again so you can understand the proper context...which is COMPLETELY different from your inane cut and past attempt.



Thanks for making my point for me ToJAM ... mere allegations can derail a federal contract - not an actual finding of safety violations, but the mere allegations - that gives someone a lot of POWER
 

Merlin99

Visualize whirled peas
PREMO Member
Here are the full two paragraphs that include the one sentence you cherry picked and removed from context....



Now go back and read that again so you can understand the proper context...which is COMPLETELY different from your inane cut and past attempt.

How does that read completely different? I read both of them and get the same thing.
 

LightRoasted

If I may ...
If I may ...

Of course the article fails to mention the responsibility of the employee to give two weeks notice to the company prior to their death.
 

itsbob

I bowl overhand
Here are the full two paragraphs that include the one sentence you cherry picked and removed from context....



Now go back and read that again so you can understand the proper context...which is COMPLETELY different from your inane cut and past attempt.

420 on the job deaths in the UAW.. How many fines did Obama levy against them??

How many Federal Contracts did Obama precluded them from.. exactly??
 
Top