It doesn't sound like Kushner falsified information because it is being reported he didn't provide any information. Had he provided a partial list than that would have willful omission. The fact that an incomplete form was signed off by a security officer who's job it is to ensure all required information is provided means is the failure in process. He should not have been granted clearance until all information was accounted for and verified.
Exactly, people get disapproved for a security clearance all the time for omitting information. To say its forthcoming months after the form was submitted is ridiculous and wouldn't fly for any normal person. Additionally, why is it so hard for him to provide a list? Why did he choose to leave that section blank.
Oh stop. You know very well how often forms are submitted and require amendments for missing attachments and blocks of information. So again... if clearance was granted based on incomplete information that falls on the security person who cleared it. But reading Larry's post points out this is FAKE OUTRAGE once again.
Not for your security clearance, at least not generally. They usually look at omitting information as being intentional. Plus, you have to sign and attest to the facts in the form. It's not very reasonable to say you didn't review it before it was released. Also, if it was an early draft, wouldn't they Kush have the detailed version readily available?
Submissions of incomplete forms happen all the time including security forms especially if they are mistakenly submitted early which also happens on a regular basis and very easy to do now that everything happens with the press of a button. It is indeed logical that if he and his admin staff were still compiling a complete list then there would be nothing on the draft.
