Yes it is. That's not the "objective", per se, but it is absolutely what must happen to float everyone else higher. It already has been happening. Barry was 100% good with that.
No, it's not. Exxon, to stay with the example (pick another if you like) will only get bigger in the New World Order of Bush 41. To say Obama is on board with 41 and 43 is pretty much a 'duh' moment. You could argue Exxon would then become 'less' American and use a nationalism argument and make the point but not an over economic reduction argument. Use you for example. Your company could end up being bought by, name someone big in your sector, and be LESS American as that corporation expanded globally but, over all, in terms of economic growth, the US economy will continue to ascend.
Looked at another way, because we have a fiat economy, one where QE and TARP and all of that is now accepted, you can't really even look at our economy as a real thing on the macro level in the first place. It WILL be supported to whatever extent is necessary and in no small part due to the interdependency of other nations who, while you are concerned about their 'elevation' at our expense, are actually dealing with the same thing; losing THEIR identity and autonomy while still growing over all as they, in their turn are a part of the ever growing NWO.