Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Times columnist blasted by nasty left for climate change piece

  1. #1
    INGSOC GURPS's Avatar
    Member Since
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Peoples Republic Of Maryland
    Posts
    33,970

    Times columnist blasted by nasty left for climate change piece

    Times columnist blasted by nasty left for climate change piece

    Former Wall Street Journal writer Bret Stephens has now managed to draw ire from the left after his column ran online Friday.

    As a noted never Trumper and climate skeptic, he has seen his fair share of hate mail and Twitter trolls over the past year-and-a-half but nothing like what hes endured since his article was posted, he says.

    After 20 months of being harangued by bullying Trump supporters, Im reminded that the nasty left is no different. Perhaps worse, Stephens tweeted Friday afternoon, as the hateful messages kept rolling in.

    Go eat dog ds, fumed one Twitter user.

    When is the Times going to get rid of you? another asked.

    Stephens even managed to tick off fellow journalists.

    Youre a sthead. a crybaby lil fkin weenie. a massive #### too, tweeted Libby Watson, staff writer at Gizmodo.

    Im gonna lose my mind, seethed Eve Peyser, politics writer at Vice.

    The ideas ppl like @BretStephensNYT espouse are violently hateful & should not be given a platform by @NYTimes, she said.

    In the column, Stephens never states that he believes climate change is a farce. He simply asserts that people should look at claims from both supporters and deniers, in the attempt to get all the facts.
    Were tempted to suggest a conspiracy here but its just liberals agreeing yet again that conservatives have hidden, evil motives, because modern liberals simply cant conceive of any other reason to disagree with the liberal consensus.

  2. #2
    Board Mommy vraiblonde's Avatar
    Member Since
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Off the grid
    Posts
    118,620
    Blog Entries
    2
    I think it's hilarious that these people toss around words like "violently hateful"....while being violently hateful.
    "Too much agreement kills a chat."
    ~Eldridge Cleaver

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by vraiblonde View Post
    I think it's hilarious that these people toss around words like "violently hateful"....while being violently hateful.
    The irony is powerful.
    "Cynicism is the smoke that rises from the ashes of burned out dreams."

  4. #4
    INGSOC GURPS's Avatar
    Member Since
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Peoples Republic Of Maryland
    Posts
    33,970
    People are furiously canceling their New York Times subscriptions after an op-ed disputing climate change was published


    The New York Times' decision to publish a debut op-ed column by the newly-hired Bret Stephens, a notable denier of anthropogenic climate change, has sparked an uproar from the paper's subscribers, who are furious that the Times decided to publish a column that is contrary to much of the modern-day scientific consensus on the dangers of global warming.

    In his column, Stephens compared the "certitude" with which Hillary Clinton's advisers believed she would win the 2016 election to climate scientists' repeated warnings about climate change risks. As evidence, Stephens said that inaccurate polling data during the 2016 campaign proves that science can miss the mark in other fields as well.

    "There’s a lesson here. We live in a world in which data convey authority. But authority has a way of descending to certitude, and certitude begets hubris," Stephens wrote.
    Were tempted to suggest a conspiracy here but its just liberals agreeing yet again that conservatives have hidden, evil motives, because modern liberals simply cant conceive of any other reason to disagree with the liberal consensus.

  5. #5
    Just curious; how many read the source article, Stephens piece?
    ADHD; Interdisciplinary

  6. #6
    INGSOC GURPS's Avatar
    Member Since
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Peoples Republic Of Maryland
    Posts
    33,970
    Quote Originally Posted by Larry Gude View Post
    Just curious; how many read the source article, Stephens piece?
    are you asking because I posted it this AM ?
    Were tempted to suggest a conspiracy here but its just liberals agreeing yet again that conservatives have hidden, evil motives, because modern liberals simply cant conceive of any other reason to disagree with the liberal consensus.

  7. #7
    Shunning the Apostate.

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by GURPS View Post
    are you asking because I posted it this AM ?
    No, just asking generally. I ask because the source piece, this guy goes after not one but two VERY sore spots for the left. He starts off by picking at the Hillary scab and pouring alcohol on it. And THEN comparing that tender spot, pretty much exactly with the logic and reasoning behind man made global cool warm changey too fast thingy. I mean, kick someone in the balls once, maybe it's an accident. Twice, you're picking a fight.
    ADHD; Interdisciplinary

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by Larry Gude View Post
    I mean, kick someone in the balls once, maybe it's an accident. Twice, you're picking a fight.
    I've heard that before.... How does that old line go? "Sticks and stones may break my bones, but I'm going to kick you repeatedly in the balls"
    "Cynicism is the smoke that rises from the ashes of burned out dreams."

  10. #10
    INGSOC GURPS's Avatar
    Member Since
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Peoples Republic Of Maryland
    Posts
    33,970
    Quote Originally Posted by Larry Gude View Post
    No, just asking generally. I ask because the source piece, this guy goes after not one but two VERY sore spots for the left. He starts off by picking at the Hillary scab and pouring alcohol on it. And THEN comparing that tender spot, pretty much exactly with the logic and reasoning behind man made global cool warm changey too fast thingy. I mean, kick someone in the balls once, maybe it's an accident. Twice, you're picking a fight.


    Yes I did, when I posted it this morning ..
    Were tempted to suggest a conspiracy here but its just liberals agreeing yet again that conservatives have hidden, evil motives, because modern liberals simply cant conceive of any other reason to disagree with the liberal consensus.

Members who have read this thread: 0

There are no members to list at the moment.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search:     Advanced Search
Search HELP

| Home | Help | Contact Us | About somd.com | Privacy | Advertising | Sponsors | Newsletter |

| What's New | What's Cool | Top Rated | Add A Link | Mod a Link |

| Announcements | Bookstore | Cafe | Calendar | Classifieds | Community |
| Culture | Dating | Dining | Education | Employment | Entertainment |
| Forums | Free E-Mail | Games | Gear! | Government | Guestbook | Health | Marketplace | Mortgage | News |
| Organizations | Photos | Real Estate | Relocation | Sports | Survey | Travel | Wiki | Weather | Worship |