WashPo publishes fake news to distract from the Seth Rich murder

[vraiblonde]

https://www.infowars.com/did-wash-p...a-story-to-distract-from-seth-rich-bombshell/

The Washington Post published its dubious story on President Trump leaking classified information to the Russians less than an hour after the bombshell news broke that murdered DNC staffer Seth Rich was in contact with Wikileaks and that DC Police were ordered to cover it up.

The coincidental timing has led many Trump supporters to accuse the Post of publishing their story in an attempt to distract the rest of the media from focusing on the massive new revelations in the Seth Rich case.

PS, this is one of them there "opinion pieces" that you hear tell about. Like what the Washington Post and New York Times do, only this one isn't paid for by the Democrats. One difference, though, is that this site actually names names - real humans that exist, not just a bunch of "anonymous sources".

Something to consider. If you're a person who likes to, you know, consider things.

 

[Sapidus]

https://www.infowars.com/did-wash-p...a-story-to-distract-from-seth-rich-bombshell/

The Washington Post published its dubious story on President Trump leaking classified information to the Russians less than an hour after the bombshell news broke that murdered DNC staffer Seth Rich was in contact with Wikileaks and that DC Police were ordered to cover it up.

The coincidental timing has led many Trump supporters to accuse the Post of publishing their story in an attempt to distract the rest of the media from focusing on the massive new revelations in the Seth Rich case.

PS, this is one of them there "opinion pieces" that you hear tell about. Like what the Washington Post and New York Times do, only this one isn't paid for by the Democrats. One difference, though, is that this site actually names names - real humans that exist, not just a bunch of "anonymous sources".

Something to consider. If you're a person who likes to, you know, consider things.

This is your trusted source you get your info from? Infowars? Wow. You really are so far down the conspiracy theory rabbit hole. Jeez. You go on and on about the liberal media but see nothing hypocritical in listening to a raving lunatic who has made it clear he is in it for the money and doesn't believe half the crap he says or posts or hosts on his site.

 

[vraiblonde]

This is your trusted source you get your info from? Infowars? Wow. You really are so far down the conspiracy theory rabbit hole. Jeez. You go on and on about the liberal media but see nothing hypocritical in listening to a raving lunatic who has made it clear he is in it for the money and doesn't believe half the crap he says or posts or hosts on his site.

Try and keep up, little monkey.

PS, this is one of them there "opinion pieces" that you hear tell about.

 

[hotbikermama40]

This is your trusted source you get your info from? Infowars? Wow. You really are so far down the conspiracy theory rabbit hole. Jeez. You go on and on about the liberal media but see nothing hypocritical in listening to a raving lunatic who has made it clear he is in it for the money and doesn't believe half the crap he says or posts or hosts on his site.

Try and keep up, little monkey.

The Washington Post, too, DID publish this...but again...maybe only those who "consider things" would have caught that specifying statement. The 'raving lunatic' may be bat#### crazy - but his supposition that the timing of said article is suspect is not undeniably so.

 

[Midnightrider]

https://www.infowars.com/did-wash-p...a-story-to-distract-from-seth-rich-bombshell/

The Washington Post published its dubious story on President Trump leaking classified information to the Russians less than an hour after the bombshell news broke that murdered DNC staffer Seth Rich was in contact with Wikileaks and that DC Police were ordered to cover it up.

The coincidental timing has led many Trump supporters to accuse the Post of publishing their story in an attempt to distract the rest of the media from focusing on the massive new revelations in the Seth Rich case.

PS, this is one of them there "opinion pieces" that you hear tell about. Like what the Washington Post and New York Times do, only this one isn't paid for by the Democrats. One difference, though, is that this site actually names names - real humans that exist, not just a bunch of "anonymous sources".

Something to consider. If you're a person who likes to, you know, consider things.

Bwhahahaha


That's pretty funny right there. I guess the WaPo just had a 'trump gives classified information to the Russians' story in the vault waiting to spring it, and trump just happened to meet with the Russians at the exact same time that this wiki links story was coming out. Yeah, that's plausible

 

[vraiblonde]

The Washington Post, too, DID publish this...

They did?

Then it's probably a lie.

Darn it.

 

[Gilligan]

Bwhahahaha

You are easily amused, eh, shortbus?

 

[hotbikermama40]

They did?

Then it's probably a lie.

Darn it.

LOL...they really just need to start selling the Post right next to The Globe and The Enquirer...

 

[tommyjo]

https://www.infowars.com/did-wash-p...a-story-to-distract-from-seth-rich-bombshell/

The Washington Post published its dubious story on President Trump leaking classified information to the Russians less than an hour after the bombshell news broke that murdered DNC staffer Seth Rich was in contact with Wikileaks and that DC Police were ordered to cover it up.

The coincidental timing has led many Trump supporters to accuse the Post of publishing their story in an attempt to distract the rest of the media from focusing on the massive new revelations in the Seth Rich case.

PS, this is one of them there "opinion pieces" that you hear tell about. Like what the Washington Post and New York Times do, only this one isn't paid for by the Democrats. One difference, though, is that this site actually names names - real humans that exist, not just a bunch of "anonymous sources".

Something to consider. If you're a person who likes to, you know, consider things.

so a few hours ago you posted comments about how stupid people were for reading opinion pieces and being told by the press what to think...this was in reference to the President threatening to take his marbles away and cancel daily press briefings...

and now you post an opinion piece from Infowars as if it is some sort of factual new item!?!?!

OMG...that is almost as priceless as Gilligan's inability to understand the definitional difference between weather and climate!!!

 

[hotbikermama40]

PS, this is one of them there "opinion pieces" that you hear tell about. Like what the Washington Post and New York Times do, only this one isn't paid for by the Democrats. One difference, though, is that this site actually names names - real humans that exist, not just a bunch of "anonymous sources".

Something to consider. If you're a person who likes to, you know, consider things.

so a few hours ago you posted comments about how stupid people were for reading opinion pieces and being told by the press what to think...this was in reference to the President threatening to take his marbles away and cancel daily press briefings...

and now you post an opinion piece from Infowars as if it is some sort of factual new item!?!?!

OMG...that is almost as priceless as Gilligan's inability to understand the definitional difference between weather and climate!!!

Where does she indicate anything at all as fact?

 

[PsyOps]

That deafening sound of just burst my eardrums.

 

[Gilligan]

OMG...that is almost as priceless as Gilligan's inability to understand the definitional difference between weather and climate!!!

Links?..or I'm going to stop paying your electric bill.

 

[vraiblonde]

Where does she indicate anything at all as fact?

Or news?

Or that that opinion piece was *my* opinion.



Like shooting fish in a barrel.

 

[Hijinx]

Or news?

Or that that opinion piece was *my* opinion.



Like shooting fish in a barrel.

More like going to the Psych ward and watching thru the glass as they bounce off the padded walls.

 

[awpitt]

Infowars is nothing but one giant far right OpEd. That's why they name names etc regardless of the truthfulness. Hardly fair and balanced news.

 

[Hijinx]

Infowars is nothing but one giant far right OpEd. That's why they name names etc regardless of the truthfulness. Hardly fair and balanced news.

You see?? Now you have given YOUR opinion.

Vrai gives hers, then you give yours. That's the way the forum works.

 

[awpitt]

You see?? Now you have given YOUR opinion.

Vrai gives hers, then you give yours. That's the way the forum works.

Yeah, and your point?

 

[Gilligan]

Infowars is nothing but one giant far right OpEd. That's why they name names etc regardless of the truthfulness. Hardly fair and balanced news.

Seriously. Stick with the New York Times, WaPo, and Salon.

 

[vraiblonde]

Infowars is nothing but one giant far right OpEd. That's why they name names etc regardless of the truthfulness. Hardly fair and balanced news.

WashPo and NYT are nothing but one giant far left OpEd, and they only use unnamed "sources". Hardly fair and balanced news.

 

[Sapidus]

WashPo and NYT are nothing but one giant far left OpEd, and they only use unnamed "sources". Hardly fair and balanced news.

So Alex Jones this morning said Macmasters "was a leather daddy who could suck a golf ball through a hose". Great reporting. Fair and balanced? But yesterday we were supposed to believe Macmasters statement that nothing classified had been shared.

How could you take someone like that seriously?