SCOTUS to hear Trump travel ban appeal, ban reinstated

black dog

Free America
Well, Imagine that... And the Democrats heads explode again....
What a great time to be a citizen of America.
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
But we knew that was going to happen. Not sure why these activist judges are allowed to waste our time and money like that.
 

Chris0nllyn

Well-Known Member
But we knew that was going to happen. Not sure why these activist judges are allowed to waste our time and money like that.

Keep in mind, this is not over and SCOTUS didn't say it was good to go.

They just agreed to hear it and removed the stay from the lower courts.
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
Keep in mind, this is not over and SCOTUS didn't say it was good to go.

They just agreed to hear it and removed the stay from the lower courts.

The court also granted the government's request to reinstate part of Trump's travel ban, which would affect people from Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen.

^^ That is your Magic 8 Ball to predict the future.
 

Bann

Doris Day meets Lady Gaga
PREMO Member
But we knew that was going to happen. Not sure why these activist judges are allowed to waste our time and money like that.

Right?!

Thank Gawd for Trump. He really is going for it and doesn't care who on the left or which special interest groups/lobbyists hate him.

It's Schadenfreude everyday! :lmao:
 

Chris0nllyn

Well-Known Member
But you can probably figure out which way the wind is blowing, right?

One could assume so, sure.

Then again, when Judge Traxler originally struck down MD's assault weapons case, I was hopeful it'd turn out the way I wanted. Instead, the full court in 4CA upheld the ban.
 

awpitt

Main Streeter
The court also granted the government's request to reinstate part of Trump's travel ban, which would affect people from Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen.

^^ That is your Magic 8 Ball to predict the future.

The ban will not apply to foreign nationals who can show that they have a "bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States."

This is what the original plaintiffs were looking for.
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
Thank Gawd for Trump. He really is going for it and doesn't care who on the left or which special interest groups/lobbyists hate him.

He is clearly not there to rub elbows and make powerful friends, that is for sure.

But this is simple constitutional law with precedent and those progbot activist judges certainly knew that, otherwise they have no business being part of our judicial system except as an inmate.
 
Top