Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: The real story of that Lynch-Clinton tarmac meeting gets even stranger

  1. #1
    INGSOC GURPS's Avatar
    Member Since
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Peoples Republic Of Maryland
    Posts
    33,932

    The real story of that Lynch-Clinton tarmac meeting gets even stranger

    The real story of that Lynch-Clinton tarmac meeting gets even stranger


    You’ll recall that all of this was taking place only days before Comey would hold his bizarre press conference where essentially cleared Hillary Clinton of any criminal wrongdoing in the private email server scandal. (Only to famously reopen the investigation later.) So if it was really just a casual, chance meeting to discuss grandchildren and golf, why would the Attorney General’s office be sending out a flurry of messages to the FBI Director’s office? It turns out that one of Lynch’s own attorneys was editing talking points for the White House in terms of how to address questions from the press and another of her people was sending talking points to the FBI. The Washington Free Beacon once again has the details. (Emphasis added)

    One of former Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s top lawyers at the Justice Department helped edit Obama administration press statements about the infamous meeting between Lynch and Bill Clinton on a tarmac last summer.

    The same attorney, Paige Herwig, is now the deputy general counsel for Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee. That panel is now investigating whether Lynch played any role in trying to influence the scope or intensity of the FBI’s investigation into the Hillary Clinton email scandal…

    [O]n June 29, 2016, two days after the Clinton-Lynch meeting when the national news media was first learning of the tarmac one-on-one, Melanie Newman, the then-director of public affairs at the Justice Department, emailed her FBI counterpart to “flag” the media stories about the tarmac meeting that she noted were “gaining traction tonight.”

    Newman included a transcript of a question Lynch answered about the meeting the following day, as well as Justice Department talking points on the topic, which are redacted in the emails.

    Two obvious questions leap to mind immediately. The first is a no-brainer which somebody at Justice should be addressing for us. Lynch had, by that point, already essentially recused herself from the question of possible prosecution of Hillary Clinton, saying she would leave the decision entirely up to the FBI, so why was her staff sending a blizzard of information and press talking points to the FBI after the secret meeting was revealed?
    Weíre tempted to suggest a conspiracy here ó but itís just liberals agreeing yet again that conservatives have hidden, evil motives, because modern liberals simply canít conceive of any other reason to disagree with the liberal consensus.

  2. #2
    Board Mommy vraiblonde's Avatar
    Member Since
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Off the grid
    Posts
    118,565
    Blog Entries
    2
    How many of us learned about Tammany Hall and the Tweed Ring in high school? Raise your hand.
    "Too much agreement kills a chat."
    ~Eldridge Cleaver

  3. #3
    INGSOC GURPS's Avatar
    Member Since
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Peoples Republic Of Maryland
    Posts
    33,932
    Quote Originally Posted by vraiblonde View Post
    How many of us learned about Tammany Hall and the Tweed Ring in high school? Raise your hand.
    it would be inconvenient to teach such Democratic Party shenanigans today

    Weíre tempted to suggest a conspiracy here ó but itís just liberals agreeing yet again that conservatives have hidden, evil motives, because modern liberals simply canít conceive of any other reason to disagree with the liberal consensus.

  4. #4
    Registered User Grumpy's Avatar
    Member Since
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Loveville
    Posts
    1,909
    Quote Originally Posted by GURPS View Post
    ... emailed her FBI counterpart to “flag” the media stories about the tarmac meeting that she noted were “gaining traction tonight.”

    Newman included a transcript of a question Lynch answered about the meeting the following day, as well as Justice Department talking points on the topic, which are redacted in the emails.
    I wanna know WHY the entire talking points were redacted..makes no sense at all, except to cover up criminality IMO

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Member Since
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    23,300
    So basically what we are saying here is that the guy who was running the farce reasons for the Lynch-Clinton meeting is now working on the committee that is investigating it?

    LMAO. This is a joke. The whole Justice Department, FBI and all were under the thumb of Obama.
    And it appears it still is.

    These people have us by the balls and must be laughing their asses off at how ridiculously easy it is to get away with their corruption.
    It is the same with Mueller and his democrat lawyers investigating Trump and the Russians.

    The Democrats may have lost the election, but they are still running the government.

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by vraiblonde View Post
    How many of us learned about Tammany Hall and the Tweed Ring in high school? Raise your hand.
    Where Cosa Nostra found their future.

Members who have read this thread: 34

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search:     Advanced Search
Search HELP

| Home | Help | Contact Us | About somd.com | Privacy | Advertising | Sponsors | Newsletter |

| What's New | What's Cool | Top Rated | Add A Link | Mod a Link |

| Announcements | Bookstore | Cafe | Calendar | Classifieds | Community |
| Culture | Dating | Dining | Education | Employment | Entertainment |
| Forums | Free E-Mail | Games | Gear! | Government | Guestbook | Health | Marketplace | Mortgage | News |
| Organizations | Photos | Real Estate | Relocation | Sports | Survey | Travel | Wiki | Weather | Worship |