Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 30

Thread: Liberal Reporter Fails Background Check…

  1. #1
    INGSOC GURPS's Avatar
    Member Since
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Peoples Republic Of Maryland
    Posts
    33,378

    Liberal Reporter Fails Background Check…

    Memo to leftist new’s editors: those stories you keep writing where you send reporters to buy guns to prove…I don’t know, whatever you’re trying to prove? You may want to run your own background check on the reporter first. You know, to avoid the inevitable surgical removal of your foot, lodged forcibly into your own mouth. Also to prevent ours from being lodged forcibly up your ass. ObamaCare probably won’t cover that. Unless you’re a transgender something or other.

    Just ask the Chicago Sun Times, who sent a reporter (who wrote this) to buy a gun, only to find out he wasn’t allowed to:

    In an attempt to show how easy it is to buy a modern sporting rifle, Neil Steinberg, of the Chicago Sun-Times, was denied by the store owner’s because “it was uncovered that Mr. Steinberg has an admitted history of alcohol abuse, and a charge for domestic battery involving his wife.”

    Mr. Steinburg tried to allege that wasn’t the real reason. According to him it was because, “they knew I planned to immediately sell it back to them.”

    He further complains that people who have yet to commit a crime, unlike him, are able to buy guns. “Would-be terrorists can buy guns…But reporters . . . that’s a different story.”



    Liberal Reporter Tries to Buy Gun for ‘Gotcha!’ Piece. Fails Background Check…


    We’re tempted to suggest a conspiracy here — but it’s just liberals agreeing yet again that conservatives have hidden, evil motives, because modern liberals simply can’t conceive of any other reason to disagree with the liberal consensus.

  2. #2
    The same thing happened to a Philadelphia reporter about a decade ago.

  3. #3
    Power with Control glhs837's Avatar
    Member Since
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    19,625
    Quote Originally Posted by GURPS View Post
    Memo to leftist new’s editors: those stories you keep writing where you send reporters to buy guns to prove…I don’t know, whatever you’re trying to prove? You may want to run your own background check on the reporter first. You know, to avoid the inevitable surgical removal of your foot, lodged forcibly into your own mouth. Also to prevent ours from being lodged forcibly up your ass. ObamaCare probably won’t cover that. Unless you’re a transgender something or other.

    Just ask the Chicago Sun Times, who sent a reporter (who wrote this) to buy a gun, only to find out he wasn’t allowed to:

    In an attempt to show how easy it is to buy a modern sporting rifle, Neil Steinberg, of the Chicago Sun-Times, was denied by the store owner’s because “it was uncovered that Mr. Steinberg has an admitted history of alcohol abuse, and a charge for domestic battery involving his wife.”

    Mr. Steinburg tried to allege that wasn’t the real reason. According to him it was because, “they knew I planned to immediately sell it back to them.”

    He further complains that people who have yet to commit a crime, unlike him, are able to buy guns. “Would-be terrorists can buy guns…But reporters . . . that’s a different story.”



    Liberal Reporter Tries to Buy Gun for ‘Gotcha!’ Piece. Fails Background Check…


    Seems it should be easy for him to find some would be terrorist to go prove his point for him.
    "I aim to misbehave."

  4. #4
    Board Mommy vraiblonde's Avatar
    Member Since
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Off the grid
    Posts
    117,898
    Blog Entries
    2
    It seems hilarious to me that Murder Capital Chicago would send one of their newspaper reporters to prove how easy guns are to get from a gun dealer, yet ignore the fact that the most prevalent murderers in their city don't purchase their guns legally.
    "Too much agreement kills a chat."
    ~Eldridge Cleaver

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by vraiblonde View Post
    It seems hilarious to me that Murder Capital Chicago would send one of their newspaper reporters to prove how easy guns are to get from a gun dealer, yet ignore the fact that the most prevalent murderers in their city don't purchase their guns legally.
    But, that's not their point. Their point isn't about who is using guns, it is that the guns are the problem. They don't have a problem with Chicago's gun laws per se, they believe illegal guns are entering Chicago from areas nearby where guns are too easy to get.

    The fact that there is no such thing as a gun-show loophole doesn't matter, people talk about it like it exists. The fact that registered gun owners account for about 1% of all gun crimes doesn't matter - guns are too easy to obtain legally.

    Facts don't matter, as seen by the spin "Would-be terrorists can buy guns…But reporters . . . that’s a different story.”
    There are only two possibilities; one is that we are alone in the universe, the other is that we are not.
    Both are terrifying.

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by This_person View Post
    But, that's not their point. Their point isn't about who is using guns, it is that the guns are the problem. They don't have a problem with Chicago's gun laws per se, they believe illegal guns are entering Chicago from areas nearby where guns are too easy to get.

    The fact that there is no such thing as a gun-show loophole doesn't matter, people talk about it like it exists. The fact that registered gun owners account for about 1% of all gun crimes doesn't matter - guns are too easy to obtain legally.

    Facts don't matter, as seen by the spin "Would-be terrorists can buy guns…But reporters . . . that’s a different story.”

    Do you know what the " gunshow loophole " is?
    Private transfers without background checks of hand and long guns is the gunshow loophole.
    At least 32 Free States have private transfers that are done without a background / nics check.
    Originally Posted by littlelady View Post
    I just reported you. You are one scary individual.

  7. #7
    INGSOC GURPS's Avatar
    Member Since
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Peoples Republic Of Maryland
    Posts
    33,378
    Quote Originally Posted by black dog View Post
    Do you know what the " gunshow loophole " is?
    Private transfers without background checks of hand and long guns is the gunshow loophole.
    At least 32 Free States have private transfers that are done without a background / nics check.






    indeed the loop hole is a private citizen selling his personal property to another private citizen
    [not stolen property]



    Gun haters want ALL transfers recorded for later confiscation
    [yes that is my tinfoil take on the matter]
    We’re tempted to suggest a conspiracy here — but it’s just liberals agreeing yet again that conservatives have hidden, evil motives, because modern liberals simply can’t conceive of any other reason to disagree with the liberal consensus.

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by GURPS View Post




    indeed the loop hole is a private citizen selling his personal property to another private citizen
    [not stolen property]



    Gun haters want ALL transfers recorded for later confiscation
    [yes that is my tinfoil take on the matter]

    no tinfoil hat required. History shows that's Exactly how it's always used.

    California or NY will be the first to demonstrate it here.

  9. 09-12-2017, 02:07 PM

  10. #9
    INGSOC GURPS's Avatar
    Member Since
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Peoples Republic Of Maryland
    Posts
    33,378
    Quote Originally Posted by Wishbone View Post
    no tinfoil hat required. History shows that's Exactly how it's always used.

    California or NY will be the first to demonstrate it here.






    already demonstrated in NY and Califuku ...
    oh we are banning X weapon, turn it in or else
    oh a doctor said you were a mental health risk, give me your firearms
    We’re tempted to suggest a conspiracy here — but it’s just liberals agreeing yet again that conservatives have hidden, evil motives, because modern liberals simply can’t conceive of any other reason to disagree with the liberal consensus.

  11. #10
    You guys forget that you live in Maryland, and they started doing a 7 day mail in background check for handguns with the State Police in 1966. Two years before the 68 gun control act and about 11 years before ATF was put in place.
    Originally Posted by littlelady View Post
    I just reported you. You are one scary individual.

Members who have read this thread: 50

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search:     Advanced Search
Search HELP

| Home | Help | Contact Us | About somd.com | Privacy | Advertising | Sponsors | Newsletter |

| What's New | What's Cool | Top Rated | Add A Link | Mod a Link |

| Announcements | Bookstore | Cafe | Calendar | Classifieds | Community |
| Culture | Dating | Dining | Education | Employment | Entertainment |
| Forums | Free E-Mail | Games | Gear! | Government | Guestbook | Health | Marketplace | Mortgage | News |
| Organizations | Photos | Real Estate | Relocation | Sports | Survey | Travel | Wiki | Weather | Worship |