Melania Trump cuts bloated first lady payroll from Michelle Obama days

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...st-lady-payroll-from-michelle-obama-days.html

Melania Trump is embracing a more active and public schedule as first lady – but she still runs one of the leanest East Wing operations in recent history.

According to a Fox News analysis of White House personnel reports, Melania Trump has significantly reduced the number of aides on the first lady's office payroll in comparison to her predecessor, Michelle Obama.

During then-President Barack Obama’s first year in office, 16 people were listed working for Michelle Obama, earning a combined $1.24 million a year.

This year, just four people were listed working for Melania Trump as of June. Their salaries totaled $486,700.


It's nice having a President who's earned his own money, and so have his friends, so they don't need to raid our Treasury to get rich.
 

transporter

Well-Known Member
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...st-lady-payroll-from-michelle-obama-days.html

Melania Trump is embracing a more active and public schedule as first lady – but she still runs one of the leanest East Wing operations in recent history.

According to a Fox News analysis of White House personnel reports, Melania Trump has significantly reduced the number of aides on the first lady's office payroll in comparison to her predecessor, Michelle Obama.

During then-President Barack Obama’s first year in office, 16 people were listed working for Michelle Obama, earning a combined $1.24 million a year.

This year, just four people were listed working for Melania Trump as of June. Their salaries totaled $486,700.


It's nice having a President who's earned his own money, and so have his friends, so they don't need to raid our Treasury to get rich.

Just to point out the ignorance of the above commentary:

There is no need for a First Lady to have a staff if the First Lady has no agenda, no goal, no "cause, or no interest in doing anything to benefit the nation or it citizens. Mrs. Trump's page on the White House site (https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/first-lady-melania-trump) lists nothing but her resume.

As for the commentary about Mrs. Obama, her staff wasn't any more "bloated" than her predecessors: https://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/firstlady.asp

As for the poster's comments about the President having earned his own money and his friends doing the same so they don't have to raid the Treasury...how much has Mr. Trump spent flying back and forth on Air Force One to his golf courses? How much have his "friends" and cabinet secretaries spent on private charters while in office? And how much are they going to give back to themselves in the form of tax cuts? Come on...remove your head from your rectum.
 

Bann

Doris Day meets Lady Gaga
PREMO Member
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/10/20/melania-trump-cuts-bloated-first-lady-payroll-from-michelle-obama-days.html


It's nice having a President who's earned his own money, and so have his friends, so they don't need to raid our Treasury to get rich.
Isn't it, though?

I haven't read any further than this, and I am 100% certain someone will find *something* negative, and snarky as well as give some reason as to why Melania should not get praise and credit for this. :coffee:
 

Bann

Doris Day meets Lady Gaga
PREMO Member
Just to point out the ignorance of the above commentary:

There is no need for a First Lady to have a staff if the First Lady has no agenda, no goal, no "cause, or no interest in doing anything to benefit the nation or it citizens.

:jet:

Yep.
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
I haven't read any further than this, and I am 100% certain someone will find *something* negative, and snarky as well as give some reason as to why Melania should not get praise and credit for this. :coffee:

Well, now that the first bot has chimed in...

:bawl:

:lol:

They are ugly hate-filled pathetic little ####s, aren't they? It must suck to be so miserable.

Hey, Trans? Does it suck to be so miserable? Enquiring minds want to know. :coffee:
 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
Just to point out the ignorance of the above commentary:

There is no need for a First Lady to have a staff if the First Lady has no agenda, no goal, no "cause, or no interest in doing anything to benefit the nation or it citizens. Mrs. Trump's page on the White House site (https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/first-lady-melania-trump) lists nothing but her resume.

As for the commentary about Mrs. Obama, her staff wasn't any more "bloated" than her predecessors: https://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/firstlady.asp

As for the poster's comments about the President having earned his own money and his friends doing the same so they don't have to raid the Treasury...how much has Mr. Trump spent flying back and forth on Air Force One to his golf courses? How much have his "friends" and cabinet secretaries spent on private charters while in office? And how much are they going to give back to themselves in the form of tax cuts? Come on...remove your head from your rectum.

Speaking of heads in rectums. How can you breath like that?
 

Sapidus

Well-Known Member
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...st-lady-payroll-from-michelle-obama-days.html

Melania Trump is embracing a more active and public schedule as first lady – but she still runs one of the leanest East Wing operations in recent history.

According to a Fox News analysis of White House personnel reports, Melania Trump has significantly reduced the number of aides on the first lady's office payroll in comparison to her predecessor, Michelle Obama.

During then-President Barack Obama’s first year in office, 16 people were listed working for Michelle Obama, earning a combined $1.24 million a year.

This year, just four people were listed working for Melania Trump as of June. Their salaries totaled $486,700.


It's nice having a President who's earned his own money, and so have his friends, so they don't need to raid our Treasury to get rich.

You complain about people being misled by the media but you fall for this hook line and sinker.


They have simply reframed the fact that she does nothing, has no agenda and takes no meetings to appear as though she is saving money yet accomplishing something.

Yet you lavish praise on her just like the good little sheep you are.

You are so far gone you don’t even realize you are guilty of the exact thing you complain most loudly about.

Such a hypocritical bot.
 

black dog

Free America
You complain about people being misled by the media but you fall for this hook line and sinker.


They have simply reframed the fact that she does nothing, has no agenda and takes no meetings to appear as though she is saving money yet accomplishing something.

Yet you lavish praise on her just like the good little sheep you are.

You are so far gone you don’t even realize you are guilty of the exact thing you complain most loudly about.

Such a hypocritical bot.

It's funny to hear the wacky left cry about saving money..
moch.jpg
 

PeoplesElbow

Well-Known Member
Just to point out the ignorance of the above commentary:

There is no need for a First Lady to have a staff if the First Lady has no agenda, no goal, no "cause, or no interest in doing anything to benefit the nation or it citizens.

There is no reason for any first lady to have a staff, period.
 

Merlin99

Visualize whirled peas
PREMO Member
You complain about people being misled by the media but you fall for this hook line and sinker.


They have simply reframed the fact that she does nothing, has no agenda and takes no meetings to appear as though she is saving money yet accomplishing something.

Yet you lavish praise on her just like the good little sheep you are.

You are so far gone you don’t even realize you are guilty of the exact thing you complain most loudly about.

Such a hypocritical bot.

Nobody elected either one of them, cut their budget to zero.
 

black dog

Free America
But who is going to tell us what to feed our kids for lunch then ?

How about your local school board... You know the folks that we vote to run our local schools.. Why do the Fed's need to be involved at all with what kids eat in school..
 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
I don't agree that a first lady does not need a staff.
The First lady probably gets a hundred lettes a day and requests for her presence or her backing for things.
She is scheduled for meetings and rally's, and has to sit with the President at State affairs things that need to be kept straight.
She travels with him a lot and needs someone to keep her in tune with what is going on.

I certainly think she needs a small staff to help her with these things.

What threw me off was the word bloat in the same sentence as Michelle.
 

Gilligan

#*! boat!
PREMO Member
They have simply reframed the fact that she does nothing, has no agenda and takes no meetings to appear as though she is saving money yet accomplishing something.

So, tell us...what array of amazing things did Mooch accomplish with that massive staff at her disposal?
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
How about your local school board... You know the folks that we vote to run our local schools.. Why do the Fed's need to be involved at all with what kids eat in school ...



because they take Federal Money ... same with with title nine crap



you want our money, dance to our tune
 
Top