Interesting that the fall off was partly attributed to the lack of star power that previously was held by Obama.
I'm not entirely sure that would be the case on the donor's part, but for the organizational failings of the party itself, which structured itself around him.
The issues haven't changed, so you'd think that wouldn't make a difference.
I would LIKE it to mean that voters are beginning to just turn off to party establishment types; I really think if we GET another person wholly owned by their party again in the White House, then we as a nation deserve the crap treatment we get, from Washington.
I got a letter the other day that had Trump's name all over it looking for donations.
Then as I looked at it, it came from the RNC.
Now maybe that isn't funny to some, but to me it seemed a bit strange since the Republican leadership isn't backing Trump.
They have left him out there swinging in the wind, but are using his Presidency and name to attract donations?
Now I could be wrong (that happened once before) but I refuse to send money to the RNC and reward them for not backing my President.
So in conclusion, if the DNC is having trouble. How is the RNC doing?
Take note the DNC still has it's big donors, The Nazi Soros , and others.
They lost Harvey Weinstein, but the Hollyweido's will still send them cash.