Should be Illegal Enemy Combatant for NYC Terrorist

Hijinx

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
b23hqb said:
White House wants terrorist in hospital to be considered an enemy combatant. I disagree.

Dude should be considered an unlawful/illegal enemy combatant, and therefore not under any Geneva Convention rules. And that title is legal. Interrogate the crap out of him - legally. Do not charge him with US laws - he is not under them.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...mbatant/ar-AAukfYt?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp
Click to expand...

His status would not be in question if the Police had just lit his ass up with more bullets.
 
PsyOps

PsyOps

Pixelated
I'm not sure what adding "unlawful/illegal" to it does. If we determine he is an enemy combatant, ship down to Gitmo and let the interrogations begins.
 
Hijinx

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
PsyOps said:
I'm not sure what adding "unlawful/illegal" to it does. If we determine he is an enemy combatant, ship down to Gitmo and let the interrogations begins.
Click to expand...

8 people are dead, put a rope around this ####ers neck and "Git 'er done".
 
b23hqb

b23hqb

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
PsyOps said:
I'm not sure what adding "unlawful/illegal" to it does. If we determine he is an enemy combatant, ship down to Gitmo and let the interrogations begins.
Click to expand...

"Enemy combatant" falls under Geneve Convention rules. Unlawful combatant does not fall under those rules, and they would have no rights under US law, i.e. Miranda Rights, etc. Places like Gitmo and "unusual" interrogation methods would apply in his case.

Unfortunately, as others have stated, the murderer is still alive.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top