...and, Mr. Grisham...

Clem72

Well-Known Member
Ouch. That's a hard one to justify.

Though if you break it down, what he is basically saying is that they aren't the "dangerous" type of pedos, I.E. rapists. Just like most people who watch regular porn don't rape people. But I would say given that there is no legal/moral/ethical way for them to be with the target of their desires they are possibly more likely to be rapists.

Not a topic someone who relies on their name for income should want to touch with 1000ft pole.
 

Chris0nllyn

Well-Known Member
I think there's something to be said for the stupid things this country puts people on the sex offender list for, but while he may be technically correct in that those people have never harmed anyone, someone who chooses to look at those sorts of things is ####ed in the head.
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
John Grisham is a disgusting progbot and I stopped reading his liberal bull#### years ago. It doesn't surprise me that he's also a pedophile. Seems like all those lefties are kiddie rapists.
 

mAlice

professional daydreamer
John Grisham is a disgusting progbot and I stopped reading his liberal bull#### years ago. It doesn't surprise me that he's also a pedophile. Seems like all those lefties are kiddie rapists.

My MIL loves Grisham. She left one of his books when she visited. I may need to light up a fire tonight.
 

Chris0nllyn

Well-Known Member
See the first post in this thread, then click the link.

I did, hence why I commented.

Show me the evidence of your claim that he's a pedo.

You know, I made a joke when I first started here about you. You jumped down my throat claiming you'd come after me for libel. Then you pull this crap and wonder why you get called a hypocrite.
 

This_person

Well-Known Member
I did, hence why I commented.

Show me the evidence of your claim that he's a pedo.

You know, I made a joke when I first started here about you. You jumped down my throat claiming you'd come after me for libel. Then you pull this crap and wonder why you get called a hypocrite.

I think she is saying that defending someone viewing child porn for pleasure is akin to pedophilia.
 

PsyOps

Pixelated
I think there's something to be said for the stupid things this country puts people on the sex offender list for, but while he may be technically correct in that those people have never harmed anyone, someone who chooses to look at those sorts of things is ####ed in the head.

I'm going to say this as delicately as I possibly can.

This is one biggest pieces of horse#### posts I think I've ever seen, let alone from you.

When a child is forced to have sex with an adult, or even with another child, and that is being filmed, sold, then displayed for adults to watch that child is being harmed. People that watch that filth are patronizing the harm of a child. Hence, they are participating in the harm of these children. So, technically they are harming children by watching the crap.

You can try to justify this in your narrow, sick libertarian way; when you're done, all you've done is justify the abuse of children.

I guaran-damn-tee you that if you had a child that was in a child porn movie, and that movie was all over the internet, you'd want every person that viewed it dealt with by the law. If you don't, then you're even sicker than I think you are at this very moment. If your libertarianism is so deeply rooted in your thinking that everyone is free to do as they please as long as they aren't harming anyone; even when it comes to watching child porn, this makes me really happy I'm not a libertarian in the strict sense of the word. There are lines that aren't crossed; and this one is clearly drawn.
 
Last edited:

Chris0nllyn

Well-Known Member
I'm going to say this as delicately as I possibly can.

This is one biggest pieces of horse#### posts I think I've ever seen, let alone from you.

When a child is forced to have sex with an adult, or even with another child, and that is being filmed, sold, then displayed for adults to watch that child is being harmed. People that watch that filth are patronizing the harm of a child. Hence, they are participating in the harm of these children. So, technically they are harming children by watching the crap.

You can try to justify this in you narrow, sick libertarian way; when you're done, all you've done is justify the abuse of children.

Now that we're all on govt. watchlists...

If you only consider child porn as actual intercourse, sure, but the govt. doesn't and if you look at what he actuall said, he was tlaking about those peopel locked up and on sex offender registries for other things.

I'm certainly not justifying any of that filth
 

PsyOps

Pixelated
Now that we're all on govt. watchlists...

If you only consider child porn as actual intercourse, sure, but the govt. doesn't and if you look at what he actuall said, he was tlaking about those peopel locked up and on sex offender registries for other things.

I'm certainly not justifying any of that filth

Okay, let's do this. How do you conclude that simply watching child porn isn't harming anyone?
 
Top