Sex Scandals Reveal How The Left Uses Shame To Destroy Morality

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
The Left’s Double Standard

Let’s return to Burgo’s initial commendation of shame: “shame may also serve as a force for good when we direct it at behavior damaging to the social fabric.” As noted above, liberals have certainly employed shame for certain pet causes, usually related to environmentalism or the sexual revolution. Herein lies the double standard.

Sociologists such as W. Bradford Wilcox at the University of Virginia for decades have noted the tremendous damage divorce — another project of the sexual revolution — has done to America’s social fabric. Children exposed to divorce are more likely than their peers in intact marriages to suffer from serious social or psychological pathologies. Adolescents with divorced parents are more likely to drop out of high school when compared to children from intact families. Adolescent girls with divorced parents are three times more likely to become teen mothers, while their male counterparts are twice as likely to spend time in prison.

The effects of divorce are a huge drain on our nation’s wealth and resources. If the United States enjoyed the same level of family stability today as it did in 1960, one sociologist has estimated that the nation would have 750,000 fewer children repeating grades, 1.2 million fewer school suspensions, approximately 500,000 fewer acts of teenage delinquency, about 600,000 fewer kids receiving therapy, and about 70,000 fewer suicide attempts every year. Wilcox’s research has found similar detrimental effects caused by cohabitation.

Yet our culture, media, and dominant institutions have not only abandoned any kind of shame attached to divorce, cohabitation, or other deleterious side-effects of the sexual revolution (e.g. abortion on demand, pornography); we promote them as an intrinsic part of our freedom to pursue our own life goals and self-actualization.


Sex Scandals Reveal How The Left Uses Shame To Destroy Morality



well Shame used to be a thing ....
a Female was 'shamed' if she was pregnant and not married - Scarlett Letter anyone ...
a couple was 'shamed' and shuned by the family if the just shacked up and did not get married
you were 'shamed' if you got a divorce
someone was shamed it it was found out they were queer


but the left has told us - that is all just about sex, quit judging people ......
 
Last edited:

transporter

Well-Known Member
Sociologists such as W. Bradford Wilcox at the University of Virginia for decades have noted the tremendous damage divorce — another project of the sexual revolution — has done to America’s social fabric.

yes...yes..it was so much better when women were just consider the property of their husbands and they had no rights once that ring slid on their finger.

It was so much better because the husbands could just beat their wives senseless or force them to perform their "marital duties" duties without fear of retribution or divorce. Of course the kids that grew up in those households were so much better off and turned out to be wonderful upstanding adults.

And of course, there was no pornography before the sexual revolution.

Yes...yes...the old days were just SOOO much better.
 

stgislander

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
yes...yes..it was so much better when women were just consider the property of their husbands and they had no rights once that ring slid on their finger.

It was so much better because the husbands could just beat their wives senseless or force them to perform their "marital duties" duties without fear of retribution or divorce. Of course the kids that grew up in those households were so much better off and turned out to be wonderful upstanding adults.

And of course, there was no pornography before the sexual revolution.

Yes...yes...the old days were just SOOO much better.

This rant explains a lot.
 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
yes...yes..it was so much better when women were just consider the property of their husbands and they had no rights once that ring slid on their finger.

It was so much better because the husbands could just beat their wives senseless or force them to perform their "marital duties" duties without fear of retribution or divorce. Of course the kids that grew up in those households were so much better off and turned out to be wonderful upstanding adults.

And of course, there was no pornography before the sexual revolution.

Yes...yes...the old days were just SOOO much better.

Ha ha , That's really funny. Of course it ignores the many happy families who raised great kids called America's finest generation, and the generations of families that came after including mine. I am sorry your father was such an #######, but mine was a great family man. He worked hard as did my mother, they worked together to raise 4 kids who turned out pretty damned well.

Guess you had a sorry upbringing. It sure left you a bitter POS.
 
Top