How do the anti gunners propose to confiscate almost 300,000,000 guns?
- Thread starter Bird Dog
- Start date
transporter
Well-Known Member
Honestly, the solution for you and the rest of the ignorati is to get your collective heads out of your collective asses.
The rationale proposals that are being made have nothing to do with confiscating every gun held by "law abiding citizens". That is a red herring propagated by the NRA and the gun manufactures for dimwits and people who are afraid of your own shadow. The general proposals being made involve raising the minimum purchase age for certain weapons...enhancing the background check process...
Just to put a finer point on the stupidity of your question...during a town hall meeting near the end of his presidency our last President made the exact same f***ing point. He said something to the effect of...there is no effort underway to confiscate all the guns in America...there is no logical way to do so (kinda like deporting 12 million illegal immigrants...if you can understand the parallel...which you probably can't).
There are a lot of people in the USA who would like to see this happen. I was directing my thread towards them. So you add nothing but your usual venom.
As for Obama on “no effort underway to confiscate all the guns in the USA”, he also stated I could keep health plans and my doctor, which I was unable to do either.
Whoopeee...
BOP
Well-Known Member
TJ thinks "enhanced background checks" involves some kind of BDSM.
I bet you would not find as many people as you believe who want a full gun ban. I think the NRA and the GOP have done a good job of framing it as us vs them .
I don’t think all guns should be banned.
I think the ones that were designed as weapons of war capable of killing dozens of people in minutes need to be reserved for police and military.
I also think all guns should have a serial number that is registered to you as the owner like a car title and transfers on sale or gift.
They already are. Sweet..game over, right?
We the People ARE the military if need arises, so I agree with you here. Read the document.
actually if you read the language of the dem, bill it goes way beyond just making AR-15s Illegal
This_person
Well-Known Member
I don't think all speech should be banned, either. But, if someone speaks out against the government's positions, that sews unrest in the country and is not good for law and order. Speech debating the pros and cons of positions should be reserved only for elected politicians to minimize any unrest in the country.
That makes just as much sense as what you said. It's not an analogy, it's a parallel.
I don't think all speech should be banned, either. But, if someone speaks out against the government's positions, that sews unrest in the country and is not good for law and order. Speech debating the pros and cons of positions should be reserved only for elected politicians to minimize any unrest in the country.
That makes just as much sense as what you said. It's not an analogy, it's a parallel.
More bad analogies. Try sticking to the conversation. As I’ve told you before you only confuse yourself when you try these comparisons.
You should look up the case of Hitman: a technical manual for independent contractors.
You might learn that free speech is actually restricted already. Such as in cases where it threatens the lives of others.
This_person
Well-Known Member
Bad analogy - the ability to overthrow the government is MEANT to be threatening to the life of others. If you look up "US Constitution - why do we have a second amendment" you might learn some stuff yourself.
This_person
Well-Known Member
I've seen from Sap and AwPitt - two people I would never put together in any other circumstance - that "bad analogy" means, "I can't refute your point, so I'll ignore it."
You just proved you don’t understand an analogy. Proof enough you shouldn’t try to make them.
What I did was make a comparison and show you where you were wrong and could get more information.
At least one of those two is a real person...and it ain't the Sappy one.
How many diapers you been through today?