UniParty At Work – Paul Ryan SuperPac Campaigned to Elect Democrat Conor Lamb…

[GURPS]

As evidenced by Big League Politics the Paul Ryan SuperPAC sent a mailer to Pennsylvania CD-18 voters touting Lamb’s favorable position on gun ownership rights:



Now, there will be some who think this is just a bone-headed move by Paul Ryan because the Democrats already held a +50,000 registration advantage in the district and the SuperPAC didn’t know this mailer would actually end up supporting Lamb. However, as mentioned, there’s a history here that tells us “a mistake” is likely not the case.

The real motive, based on an honest review of history, is the professional UniParty apparatus knew that Democrat Conor Lamb needed a lift to offset the cross party voting that was reflected in the district voting (by over 20 points) for Donald Trump in 2016.

The DC Republican apparatus is quite comfortable losing their majority position so long as they are not forced to support Trump policies which are entirely against their financial interests. [How Mitch McConnell Crushed The Tea-Party]

Even before candidate Trump entered the 2016 presidential race, the agenda was visible for anyone who was willing to admit it. In 2014 the same Republican leadership paid Democrats to vote against the Republican primary winner of the Mississippi Senate race (Cochran -vs- McDaniel) simply because Mitch McConnell didn’t like the idea of having an actual Republican in the seat.

UniParty At Work – Paul Ryan SuperPac Campaigned to Elect Democrat Conor Lamb…

 

[Midnightrider]

Meh, the entire GOP backed trump, a liberal, who claimed to support the 2ndA

 

[This_person]

Meh, the entire GOP backed trump, a liberal, who claimed to support the 2ndA

I remember. It wasn't even controversial. NO ONE in the GOP was against Trump even a tiny bit.




[smh]

 

[Hijinx]

Meh, the entire GOP backed trump, a liberal, who claimed to support the 2ndA

Is Alzheimers really bothering you that bad?

 

[This_person]

Is Alzheimers really bothering you that bad?

I don't think it bothers him in the least. I think he enjoys it.

 

[Midnightrider]

Is Alzheimers really bothering you that bad?

how many GOP groups campaigned against trump in the general?

like I said, they all got behind him. and that includes you despite the fact that he is a liberal gun grabber

 

[PsyOps]

Meh, the entire GOP backed trump, a liberal, who claimed to support the 2ndA

The ENTIRE GOP backed Trump?

 

[PsyOps]

how many GOP groups campaigned against trump in the general?

like I said, they all got behind him. and that includes you despite the fact that he is a liberal gun grabber

For one... the Bush's and their entire following was fervently anti-Trump. Word is, they all toss their principles out the window and voted for Hillary.

List of Republicans who opposed the Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2016

Stop Trump movement

 

[Hijinx]

how many GOP groups campaigned against trump in the general?

like I said, they all got behind him. and that includes you despite the fact that he is a liberal gun grabber

You --------------especially you-----saying it doesn't change it.
The Republicans Ryan, McConnell, and other despise Trump and never worked to help elect him, and in fact worked against him as they are still doing.

 

[Hijinx]

The ENTIRE GOP backed Trump?

This is not a lucid morning for midnight.

 

[Midnightrider]

For one... the Bush's and their entire following was fervently anti-Trump. Word is, they all toss their principles out the window and voted for Hillary.

List of Republicans who opposed the Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2016

from the link: Some of the Republicans on this list started supporting Trump after he won the presidential election
like I said, give me the list of Rs who opposed him in the general

Stop Trump movement

and from your second link: Trump received 90% of the GOP vote, while Clinton won 89% of Democratic voters.[2] Moreover, Trump was supported by 80% of Republican members of Congress in the general election


like I said, the GOP was behind trump. if you want to argue the semantics of my use of the word entire, knock yourself out.

 

[PsyOps]

from the link: Some of the Republicans on this list started supporting Trump after he won the presidential election
like I said, give me the list of Rs who opposed him in the general


and from your second link: Trump received 90% of the GOP vote, while Clinton won 89% of Democratic voters.[2] Moreover, Trump was supported by 80% of Republican members of Congress in the general election


like I said, the GOP was behind trump. if you want to argue the semantics of my use of the word entire, knock yourself out.

You'll never admit you're wrong. I'm wasting my time. There was, and still is a 'Never Trump' movement that exists within the GOP. You ask for it and I provided it. :shrug:

 

[This_person]

You'll never admit you're wrong. I'm wasting my time. There was, and still is a 'Never Trump' movement that exists within the GOP. You ask for it and I provided it. :shrug:

The evolution of a position:

Meh, the entire GOP backed trump, a liberal, who claimed to support the 2ndA

how many GOP groups campaigned against trump in the general?

like I said, they all got behind him. and that includes you despite the fact that he is a liberal gun grabber

from the link: Some of the Republicans on this list started supporting Trump after he won the presidential election
like I said, give me the list of Rs who opposed him in the general


and from your second link: Trump received 90% of the GOP vote, while Clinton won 89% of Democratic voters.[2] Moreover, Trump was supported by 80% of Republican members of Congress in the general election


like I said, the GOP was behind trump. if you want to argue the semantics of my use of the word entire, knock yourself out.

From "the entire GOP" "in the general" election to "after he won", and "entire" doesn't matter.

It's much easier to shift positions than it is to make a coherent and cogent point. If you're MR.

 

[This_person]

if you want to argue the semantics

Isn't arguing semantics 99% of your posts?

 

[stgislander]

Isn't arguing semantics 99% of your posts?

If I only had some coffee to spit all over my keyboard right now.

 

[vraiblonde]

Meh, the entire GOP backed trump, a liberal, who claimed to support the 2ndA

I nominate this post for "Guffaw of the Day".

Yes, I'm sure we all remember how the "entire GOP" backed Trump.

 

[vraiblonde]

how many GOP groups campaigned against trump in the general?

You mean besides over half of Congress and a good percentage of Governors, including our own in Maryland?

Or maybe besides our last GOP POTUS and his POTUS daddy?

And yes, bebe, that was after the primary.

 

[vraiblonde]

Isn't arguing semantics 99% of your posts?

He's not even arguing semantics, he's totally making chit up and doubling down when called on it.

As usual.

 

[PsyOps]

It's much easier to shift positions than it is to make a coherent and cogent point. If you're MR.

Or just admit you're wrong.

 

[Hijinx]

from the link: Some of the Republicans on this list started supporting Trump after he won the presidential election
like I said, give me the list of Rs who opposed him in the general


and from your second link: Trump received 90% of the GOP vote, while Clinton won 89% of Democratic voters.[2] Moreover, Trump was supported by 80% of Republican members of Congress in the general election


like I said, the GOP was behind trump. if you want to argue the semantics of my use of the word entire, knock yourself out.

I don't want to argue semantics, you are wrong, that's all. End of discussion.