gun ownership could be viewed as slavery by another name

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
[TWITTER]https://twitter.com/michaelianblack/status/977984521420378112[/TWITTER]

:yay:

[TWITTER]https://twitter.com/michaelianblack/status/977988610963189760[/TWITTER]



:shocking:

https://www.dailywire.com/news/28735/comedian-michael-ian-black-private-gun-ownership-ben-shapiro

But the most astonishing argument here is that private gun ownership is akin to slavery – presumably because my gun will magically kill you on its own, thus making your life subject to my whim. This is factually idiotic.

It is also ahistorical. Slaveowners loved nothing better than a disarmed slave population. In fact, keeping black Americans disarmed was one of the explicit purposes of the Dred Scott decision. And as historian David Kopel writes, Jim Crow laws attempted to keep black Americans without recourse to self-defense:

Immediately after the Civil War, Southern states enacted Black Codes, designed to keep the ex-slaves in de facto slavery and submission. Mississippi’s provision was typical: No freedman “shall keep or carry fire-arms of any kind, or any ammunition” without police permission. In areas where the Ku Klux Klan took control, “almost universally the first thing done was to disarm the negroes and leave them defenseless,” recounted the civil rights attorney Albion Tourgée, who represented Plessy in Plessy v. Ferguson. The Ku Klux Klan was America’s first gun control group, as well as America’s first domestic terrorist organization.
 
Top