The Party of Some Women

[GURPS]

Democrats have long claimed to be the party of women -- a political party that wants women to have a "seat at the table" in boardrooms across industries, including access to top government jobs, and equal pay. They wear pussy hats at women's marches and carry signs touting various incarnations of inclusivity and "female empowerment."

There's only one problem: Freethinking women need not apply -- as the left only supports those who subscribe to its narrowly defined political ideology.

Take the left's unbridled attacks against women picked to serve in the Trump administration, including such respected professionals as Gina Haspel, a 33-year career veteran nominated to lead the CIA. Instead of applauding the president for empowering her by offering her a top job and top pay in government -- and the unique opportunity to break a glass ceiling and become the first woman in history to lead the venerable spy agency -- Democrats are obstructing her ascent.

Sen. Kamala Harris said she'll vote against Haspel because the highly qualified intelligence expert didn't condemn the CIA's enhanced interrogation techniques used long ago as strongly as the California liberal would've liked during her Senate confirmation hearing this week. Republican Sen. Marco Rubio blasted Democrats' hypocrisy, tweeting, "Enhanced interrogation is banned by law. Treatment of Haspel example of egregious double standard. (John) Brennan was (No.) 4 official at CIA during interrogation program. He knew far more about it than Haspel did & most of dems still voted for him."





The Party of Some Women

 

[Hijinx]

Democrats have long claimed to be the party of women -- a political party that wants women to have a "seat at the table" in boardrooms across industries, including access to top government jobs, and equal pay. They wear pussy hats at women's marches and carry signs touting various incarnations of inclusivity and "female empowerment."

There's only one problem: Freethinking women need not apply -- as the left only supports those who subscribe to its narrowly defined political ideology.

Take the left's unbridled attacks against women picked to serve in the Trump administration, including such respected professionals as Gina Haspel, a 33-year career veteran nominated to lead the CIA. Instead of applauding the president for empowering her by offering her a top job and top pay in government -- and the unique opportunity to break a glass ceiling and become the first woman in history to lead the venerable spy agency -- Democrats are obstructing her ascent.

Sen. Kamala Harris said she'll vote against Haspel because the highly qualified intelligence expert didn't condemn the CIA's enhanced interrogation techniques used long ago as strongly as the California liberal would've liked during her Senate confirmation hearing this week. Republican Sen. Marco Rubio blasted Democrats' hypocrisy, tweeting, "Enhanced interrogation is banned by law. Treatment of Haspel example of egregious double standard. (John) Brennan was (No.) 4 official at CIA during interrogation program. He knew far more about it than Haspel did & most of dems still voted for him."





The Party of Some Women

Hillary herself claims she lost because women---Conservative women-- were told by their husbands not to vote for her.

She and any other liberal such as Kamala Harris have no respect whatsoever for any woman who does not think like them.

 

[vraiblonde]

This was evident during the 2016 election. Prog women - ones I personally know and got to hear them up close and personal - exclaimed loud and long that "it's time for a woman to lead!" If you asked them what they thought about Carly Fiorina or Michelle Bachmann or any other conservative female, they would spew invective until it was clear what they really meant: "it's time for a Democrat woman to lead!" Because, as they explained to me, Republican women aren't really women at all. They are slaves to the patriarchy and a bunch of other things that didn't make a lot of sense.

Oh, and they only got to their position through a husband or some other male.

From Hillary supporters....



It's a cult, I'm telling you.

 

[Grumpy]

Sen. Kamala Harris said she'll vote against Haspel because the highly qualified intelligence expert didn't condemn the CIA's enhanced interrogation techniques used long ago as strongly as the California liberal would've liked during her Senate confirmation hearing this week. Republican Sen. Marco Rubio blasted Democrats' hypocrisy, tweeting, "Enhanced interrogation is banned by law. Treatment of Haspel example of egregious double standard. (John) Brennan was (No.) 4 official at CIA during interrogation program. He knew far more about it than Haspel did & most of dems still voted for him."

If Kamala has aspirations for the presidency, she should have broke ranks with the Dem line and wholeheartedly supported Haspel's confirmation. That would have struck fear in the GOP and given other Dems that want to run the heebie jeebies.