Unusual silence from the anti-2A folks

b23hqb

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
No problems with that article. It's true, so that will not sit well with the lefties. A few parts that made real sense:

'Of course, there were some exceptions. Senate Democrats would be running to check Nancy Pelosi’s batteries if she didn’t propose a bill every time she heard someone say the word “gun'

'The reality is, as even some anti-gunners recognize, some things simply can’t be prevented. So when horrible tragedies happen in the future, even if the whole country caves and adopts gun control as strict as Maryland’s, don’t expect solutions from the gun control crowd. History and experience has taught us what to expect from them: either repetition when they haven’t gotten their way, or silence when they have.'
 

transporter

Well-Known Member

Actually what is really not surprising is that you are stunned because it shows your utter lack of understanding of the issue the majority of people have with guns and your lack of understanding of what the majority of people want vs don't want.

But your lack of understanding isn't a new concept for you is it?

It should not surprise you that the majority of people are not jumping up and down to ban shotguns....because the majority of people (who you in your pavlovian responses think are all "Anti 2A) don't want to ban all guns.

It should also not surprise you that a main concern of the majority of people is the speed at which a weapon can be fired and the capacity of rounds a weapon can fire before reloading is required. Neither of these are issues with shotguns. You know guns (seems to be all you know)...and you don't understand this?

The majority of people also understand that people will still die via gun violence.

It is only fringe folks like yourself and folks on here from the freaky far right and the folks on the freaky far left who don't seem to understand that there are methods to reduce the potential for mass shootings in this country.

You and yours want to sit around with your collective heads up your asses claiming dead school kids are just collateral damage and necessary for your continued 2A rights.
 

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
Actually what is really not surprising is that you are stunned because it shows your utter lack of understanding of the issue the majority of people have with guns and your lack of understanding of what the majority of people want vs don't want.

But your lack of understanding isn't a new concept for you is it?

It should not surprise you that the majority of people are not jumping up and down to ban shotguns....because the majority of people (who you in your pavlovian responses think are all "Anti 2A) don't want to ban all guns.

It should also not surprise you that a main concern of the majority of people is the speed at which a weapon can be fired and the capacity of rounds a weapon can fire before reloading is required. Neither of these are issues with shotguns. You know guns (seems to be all you know)...and you don't understand this?

The majority of people also understand that people will still die via gun violence.

It is only fringe folks like yourself and folks on here from the freaky far right and the folks on the freaky far left who don't seem to understand that there are methods to reduce the potential for mass shootings in this country.

You and yours want to sit around with your collective heads up your asses claiming dead school kids are just collateral damage and necessary for your continued 2A rights.


Do you just feel compelled to chime in, no matter how irrelevant and pointless your remarks are?
The discussion involves this:

1. We recognize - we meaning everyone, left, right, center - that this tragedy could NOT be avoided based on any set of laws or proposals at hand or suggested.
2. The left's normal weeks long braying and complaining about assault weapons and handguns and banning guns has been extremely silent even in the aftermath of five dead.
And - odd that it's newspaper personnel - some of their OWN - they're saying little.

So they are not cashing in with their usual arguments, because they could not have prevented this. Wow. The whole article is about this. Did you miss this, or just ignore it anyway?

And per usual, you vaguely refer to unnamed "methods" to "reduce the potential for mass shootings in this country." Oh do tell. You might actually have to DEFEND THEM, though.
 

Gilligan

#*! boat!
PREMO Member
But your lack of understanding isn't a new concept for you is it?
.

Dere she is!!...I was getting worried that my troll bait wasn't working any more!

Say baybee..it's Friday...you busy?

sheeplove.gif
 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
Do you just feel compelled to chime in, no matter how irrelevant and pointless your remarks are?
The discussion involves this:

1. We recognize - we meaning everyone, left, right, center - that this tragedy could NOT be avoided based on any set of laws or proposals at hand or suggested.
2. The left's normal weeks long braying and complaining about assault weapons and handguns and banning guns has been extremely silent even in the aftermath of five dead.
And - odd that it's newspaper personnel - some of their OWN - they're saying little.

So they are not cashing in with their usual arguments, because they could not have prevented this. Wow. The whole article is about this. Did you miss this, or just ignore it anyway?

And per usual, you vaguely refer to unnamed "methods" to "reduce the potential for mass shootings in this country." Oh do tell. You might actually have to DEFEND THEM, though.

Well the fact is that 5 people are dead by a gun.
If they were killed with an AK47 the liberals would be crapping in their nappies.
They are just as dead--so why aren't they crying?

The important here is the gun does not matter. They could have been killed with a hand grenade or a molotov cocktail.

It's the people that have urges to kill others that matters.
Where there is a will, there is a way.
 

Smokey1

Well-Known Member
Actually what is really not surprising is that you are stunned because it shows your utter lack of understanding of the issue the majority of people have with guns and your lack of understanding of what the majority of people want vs don't want.

But your lack of understanding isn't a new concept for you is it?

It should not surprise you that the majority of people are not jumping up and down to ban shotguns....because the majority of people (who you in your pavlovian responses think are all "Anti 2A) don't want to ban all guns.

It should also not surprise you that a main concern of the majority of people is the speed at which a weapon can be fired and the capacity of rounds a weapon can fire before reloading is required. Neither of these are issues with shotguns. You know guns (seems to be all you know)...and you don't understand this?

The majority of people also understand that people will still die via gun violence.

It is only fringe folks like yourself and folks on here from the freaky far right and the folks on the freaky far left who don't seem to understand that there are methods to reduce the potential for mass shootings in this country.

You and yours want to sit around with your collective heads up your asses claiming dead school kids are just collateral damage and necessary for your continued 2A rights.


It's you who doesn't understand. Shotguns can also be semi automatic (assault weapon) and each round fired shoots out multiple pellets so the effect can be just as deadly as an AR-15.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
But your lack of understanding isn't a new concept for you is it?

Did You Really Type That With A Straight Face

Every post you make is against anyone or any group that doesn't conform to your propagandist viewpoints.

You Were Saying ....

:blahblah:

to reduce the potential for mass shootings in this country.


Fantasy, Supposition, Innuendo and OPINION

You and yours want to sit around with your collective heads up your asses claiming dead school kids are just collateral damage

How Many Children died in the bathtub lasts night, died in car accidents yesterday ....
YOU want to restrict the Constitutional Rights of Americans over a few deaths ....
 
Last edited:
Top