Intersectional Left Continuing To Eat Their Own

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
Actress Ruby Rose has deleted her social media presence, after facing a backlash for being cast as "Batwoman" -- not from the right, angry that the self-described lesbian character will be played as written, but from the left, who declared Rose "not gay enough" to play the female superhero.

But LGBT and other leftist activists weren't happy; Rose is gender fluid, they complained, and Batwoman's alter ego, Kate Kane, is a self-declared lesbian, which means Rose isn't gay enough.

"A #RecastBatwoman hashtag started circulating, with people also wondering why the role couldn't have gone to a lesser-known LGBTQ+ actress in need of an acting break," women's magazine Glamour reported. "Critics also accused Rose of not being a lesbian since she also refers to herself as gender-fluid."



https://www.dailywire.com/news/34435/ruby-rose-quits-twitter-after-leftist-critics-emily-zanotti




:killingme
 

glhs837

Power with Control
Jebus Xmas!!!!!!! Some people are so determined that nothing ever is good. Must be sad to live in a perpetual state of outrage, always eeking the next emotional high.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
For the first time ever, Disney will feature an openly gay character in a movie. The upcoming film, titled "The Jungle Cruise" and based on a theme park ride, is being billed as a "turning point" for the company.

Reportedly, this will be different from the relatively subtle homosexuality in the recent "Beauty and the Beast" remake. In that case, it was merely implied that a male character had an erotic obsession with another male character. In this case, it will be made explicitly clear that the "hugely effete" character "is not interested in women." If that's true, it will indeed be a turning point. "Hugely effete" homosexuals are common in film and television these days, but not in big budget, mainstream family movies. Disney is now crossing a threshold that, even 10 years ago, would have seemed unthinkable.

Naturally, the move is causing blowback. No, not from religious conservatives. Rather, the outrage is coming from the Left. It is apparently "problematic" that Jack Whitehall, the actor hired to play the gay man, is not himself a gay man. He's not even slightly gay, which is bad because even a gay actor may not be gay enough to deserve the honor of portraying homosexuality on screen. The actress Ruby Rose was recently forced to leave Twitter to escape the criticism of her casting as a lesbian Batwoman. Rose is a lesbian, but not lesbian enough. The degree of her personal lesbianism does not sufficiently match the lesbianism of Batwoman, therefore outrage must ensue.



https://www.dailywire.com/news/34431/walsh-it-now-offensive-actors-act-matt-walsh
 

Clem72

Well-Known Member
]It is apparently "problematic" that Jack Whitehall, the actor hired to play the gay man, is not himself a gay man. He's not even slightly gay, which is bad because even a gay actor may not be gay enough to deserve the honor of portraying homosexuality on screen

I'm not sure I agree.

1.jpg
2.jpg
3.jpg
 
Top