Brennan's Accusations Against Trump In NYT Op-Ed Aren't Believable

[GURPS]

"Mr. Trump’s claims of no collusion are, in a word, hogwash," wrote Brennan. "The only questions that remain are whether the collusion that took place constituted criminally liable conspiracy, whether obstruction of justice occurred to cover up any collusion or conspiracy, and how many members of 'Trump Incorporated' attempted to defraud the government by laundering and concealing the movement of money into their pockets."

Citing the op-ed, Burr issued a rebuttal on Thursday that concisely picked apart Brennan's arguments.

"Director Brennan’s recent statements purport to know as fact that the Trump campaign colluded with a foreign power," said Burr. "If Director Brennan’s statement is based on intelligence he received while still leading the CIA, why didn’t he include it in the Intelligence Community Assessment released in 2017? If his statement is based on intelligence he has seen since leaving office, it constitutes an intelligence breach. If he has some other personal knowledge of or evidence of collusion, it should be disclosed to the Special Counsel, not The New York Times."




Senate Intel Chair: Here's Why Brennan's Accusations Against Trump In NYT Op-Ed Aren't Believable

 

[Hijinx]

"Mr. Trump’s claims of no collusion are, in a word, hogwash," wrote Brennan. "The only questions that remain are whether the collusion that took place constituted criminally liable conspiracy, whether obstruction of justice occurred to cover up any collusion or conspiracy, and how many members of 'Trump Incorporated' attempted to defraud the government by laundering and concealing the movement of money into their pockets."

Citing the op-ed, Burr issued a rebuttal on Thursday that concisely picked apart Brennan's arguments.

"Director Brennan’s recent statements purport to know as fact that the Trump campaign colluded with a foreign power," said Burr. "If Director Brennan’s statement is based on intelligence he received while still leading the CIA, why didn’t he include it in the Intelligence Community Assessment released in 2017? If his statement is based on intelligence he has seen since leaving office, it constitutes an intelligence breach. If he has some other personal knowledge of or evidence of collusion, it should be disclosed to the Special Counsel, not The New York Times."




Senate Intel Chair: Here's Why Brennan's Accusations Against Trump In NYT Op-Ed Aren't Believable

This guy was in charge of the CIA. One would assume that if he makes this statement he has proof of his statement.
Where is it? Has he presented it to Mueller?
If he lies this big in an op-ed what other lies did he make while heading the CIA?

This guy shouldn't have had a security clearance in the first place after he returned a converted Islamic from Saudi Arabia.
What kind of CIA CEO makes up tales like this without the proof in his hand.
What else did he make up while heading the CIA?

 

[stgislander]

This guy was in charge of the CIA. One would assume that if he makes this statement he has proof of his statement.
Where is it? Has he presented it to Mueller?
If he lies this big in an op-ed what other lies did he make while heading the CIA?

This guy shouldn't have had a security clearance in the first place after he returned a converted Islamic from Saudi Arabia.
What kind of CIA CEO makes up tales like this without the proof in his hand.
What else did he make up while heading the CIA?

He obviously didn't provide any proof when he testified before Congress.

 

[BOP]

He obviously didn't provide any proof when he testified before Congress.

Since it was "testimony" against Trump, and by extension, conservatives, the mere accusation is all the proof anyone needs. #factsdon'tmatter