This Lawsuit Could Shatter ALL Federal Gun Control Laws

This_person

Well-Known Member
The federal trial of a Kansas man for manufacturing and selling #firearms and silencers without a federal license could very well turn out to be the pivotal case that not only challenges the constitutionality of the National Firearms Act of 1934, but also every federal firearms law ever passed in a battle that will determine whether it is the states or the federal government that has the constitutional right to pass gun laws.

...

After a decades-long wait, we finally appear to have a case that is likely to see the United States Supreme Court have to directly examine whether the Founding Fathers meant what they said when they wrote amendments to a federal Constitution that was designed to tightly bind and constrict the reach of the federal government.
What most 21st Century Americans simply do not grasp is that the Constitution and Bill of Rights were not written to to give rights to the citizens of our then-new nation, but was instead written to tightly constrain the federal government.
The Founders had just won a long and brutal war against a far-away foreign government, and the Federalists and Anti-Federalists were locked in a power struggle on just how much power the federal government in a swamp on the Potomac River would be allowed to have. The Federalists were concerned that the federal government would be anemic and far too weak to be of any use at all, while the Anti-Federalists wanted the power to remain where they felt it belonged, with the states, so that the people in each state could determine what is best for that state’s citizens.
The Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution to placate the concerns of the Anti-Federalists, and was mean to be ten strong chains binding down the then-puny federal leviathan to prevent future abuses.
The Second Amendment of the Bill of Rights was written by Founding Fathers who understood the right to bear arms as a natural human right that the Creator bestowed upon each and every human being. How can there be any other right, if the right to defend your life is not the most paramount right of them all?

Interesting read.
 

Salmon

Well-Known Member
My God. This is the exact reason Democrats need to take over Congress. The Gorsuch for Garland trade was devastating enough for gun control and women’s rights. The Democrats need to unite against Kavanaugh.
 

black dog

Free America
My God. This is the exact reason Democrats need to take over Congress. The Gorsuch for Garland trade was devastating enough for gun control and women’s rights. The Democrats need to unite against Kavanaugh.

How's this for gun control?
20180508_165744.jpg
 

limblips

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
You guys are sick. What’s the purpose of firing a gun at a piece of paper?

The same reason people try to get a little ball in a hole using a stick or try to knock down 10 defenseless wooden pins with a big ball or throw little pointy things with feathers at a board with numbers on it or toss U-shaped things at a iron stake in the ground or throw little bags of corn at a board with a hole in it, because they enjoy it and strive to get better each time they do it. Enjoyment, you should try it sometime.
 

This_person

Well-Known Member

black dog

Free America
Does this make you feel like a tough guy?

Not sure you understand what being tough really is.
But yes, I'm mentally and physically tough. Those were shot with open sights at 100 yds.
It states I have excellent vision for a man 60 yrs old, a steady heart beat, breath control and a disciplined left index finger. Not bad for a chubby middle-aged man.
It's much better than you playing Call of Duty online..
 

black dog

Free America
You guys are sick. What’s the purpose of firing a gun at a piece of paper?

It's cheaper than golf, plus those guys have no self control.. Getting mad at a white ball they chase around and then add alcohol and shortly toss clubs in the water traps.. cray,, cray I say..
 
Top