Trump vs. blue states over SALT deductions

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
When the original tax cut package passed, much political hay was made over the caps on deductions for state and local taxes (SALT) which would primarily hit the top 10% of earners with a partial reduction in benefits they could realize when filing each year. Of course, the biggest hits would take place in the states with the highest state and local taxes. In other words, the larger blue states like California, New York and New Jersey.

They responded with clever schemes allowing their residents to get around the new rules and still take the deductions through legally dubious loopholes. California has set up a “California Excellence Fund” where high earners could simply “donate” the excess amount they would have owed to this ambiguous fund and then write it off as a “charitable contribution” to the state. Meanwhile, New York set up their own scheme to protect residents from what Governor Cuomo described as “their Constitutional right” to be protected from the massive state taxes his government imposes on them. But now the feds are fighting back. (Associated Press)


The Treasury Department’s rules released Thursday target moves by states like New York, New Jersey and California — where residents could see substantial increases in their federal tax bills next spring because of the $10,000 cap on state and local deductions. The cap was put in as a compromise to eliminating the deductions completely, as part of the massive GOP tax package pushed by President Donald Trump and enacted late last year. Experts say the issue likely will have to be resolved by the federal courts.

But the new rules’ “dollar-for-dollar” limit also applies to many other states that already have charitable funds offering tax breaks — and those programs too could be hurt by the rules. Those states include solidly Republican ones and others with relatively low taxes. In those programs, donors to schools, hospitals or land-conservation programs can get their state taxes reduced in return — plus a charitable deduction on their federal tax returns.

The limit means taxpayers only can deduct as a charitable contribution the portion of their donation for which they don’t also get a state tax credit.


https://hotair.com/archives/2018/08/24/empire-strikes-back-trump-vs-blue-states-salt-deductions/
 

Merlin99

Visualize whirled peas
PREMO Member
When the original tax cut package passed, much political hay was made over the caps on deductions for state and local taxes (SALT) which would primarily hit the top 10% of earners with a partial reduction in benefits they could realize when filing each year. Of course, the biggest hits would take place in the states with the highest state and local taxes. In other words, the larger blue states like California, New York and New Jersey.

They responded with clever schemes allowing their residents to get around the new rules and still take the deductions through legally dubious loopholes. California has set up a “California Excellence Fund” where high earners could simply “donate” the excess amount they would have owed to this ambiguous fund and then write it off as a “charitable contribution” to the state. Meanwhile, New York set up their own scheme to protect residents from what Governor Cuomo described as “their Constitutional right” to be protected from the massive state taxes his government imposes on them. But now the feds are fighting back. (Associated Press)

The Treasury Department’s rules released Thursday target moves by states like New York, New Jersey and California — where residents could see substantial increases in their federal tax bills next spring because of the $10,000 cap on state and local deductions. The cap was put in as a compromise to eliminating the deductions completely, as part of the massive GOP tax package pushed by President Donald Trump and enacted late last year. Experts say the issue likely will have to be resolved by the federal courts.

But the new rules’ “dollar-for-dollar” limit also applies to many other states that already have charitable funds offering tax breaks — and those programs too could be hurt by the rules. Those states include solidly Republican ones and others with relatively low taxes. In those programs, donors to schools, hospitals or land-conservation programs can get their state taxes reduced in return — plus a charitable deduction on their federal tax returns.

The limit means taxpayers only can deduct as a charitable contribution the portion of their donation for which they don’t also get a state tax credit.


https://hotair.com/archives/2018/08/24/empire-strikes-back-trump-vs-blue-states-salt-deductions/

you mean charitable deductions would have to be actually charitable?
 

BOP

Well-Known Member
you mean charitable deductions would have to be actually charitable?

Much of my giving is via allotments; that's not going to change. I'm conservative, and giving is what we do. My reward for giving transcends any tax advantage I derive.
 
Top