The calculated damage is done.

[limblips]

Why did Feinstein bring forward the accusation against Kavanaugh? She knew the damage would be done without ever having to prove anything. She also (and blasey-ford does too) knows that there is no way to disprove the allegation so neither she or blasey-ford will ever be held accountable. In the court of sexual allegations there is no innocent until proven guilty nor are there rules of evidence. Regardless of the outcome Kavanaugh's career has been forever tainted. Sad.

 

[vraiblonde]

Two words:

Clarence Thomas

In fact we were watching a documentary on the 90s on NatGeo last night and that was one of the segments. This Kavanaugh thing is playing out almost exactly the same, and Clarence Thomas has had a terrific Supreme career and people have to be reminded about Anita Hill.

Kavanaugh's confirmation will give the progs something to keen about and say Donald Trump's whole world is filled with rapists; then their masters will redirect their attention to some new fauxrage and they'll forget all about it.

 

[Kyle]

I hope Trump can keep the GOP from returning to their "gutless" roots.

 

[RoseRed]

Two words:

Clarence Thomas

In fact we were watching a documentary on the 90s on NatGeo last night and that was one of the segments. This Kavanaugh thing is playing out almost exactly the same, and Clarence Thomas has had a terrific Supreme career and people have to be reminded about Anita Hill.

Kavanaugh's confirmation will give the progs something to keen about and say Donald Trump's whole world is filled with rapists; then their masters will redirect their attention to some new fauxrage and they'll forget all about it.

What is unfortunate, is there are many "youngsters" that have absolutely idea about that case and choose not to do their homework and just overlook it.

 

[vraiblonde]

What is unfortunate, is there are many "youngsters" that have absolutely idea about that case and choose not to do their homework and just overlook it.

They're too busy slaying lewks.

 

[stgislander]

Two words:

Clarence Thomas

In fact we were watching a documentary on the 90s on NatGeo last night and that was one of the segments. This Kavanaugh thing is playing out almost exactly the same, and Clarence Thomas has had a terrific Supreme career and people have to be reminded about Anita Hill.

Kavanaugh's confirmation will give the progs something to keen about and say Donald Trump's whole world is filled with rapists; then their masters will redirect their attention to some new fauxrage and they'll forget all about it.

Judge Napolitano pointed something interesting out yesterday about what he sees as possible differences between the Thomas/Hill hearings and the upcoming Kavanaugh/Ford hearings. That is #MeToo. He said that during the Thomas/Hill hearings, Arlen Spector hammered Hill in his questioning. Judge Nap pointed out that because of today's climate, Reps will likely not want to be seen as being insensitive to an alleged sexual assault victim, and treat Dr. Ford with kid gloves.

 

[Gilligan]

They're too busy slaying lewks.

couldn't wait to use that, could ya?

 

[vraiblonde]

Judge Napolitano pointed something interesting out yesterday about what he sees as possible differences between the Thomas/Hill hearings and the upcoming Kavanaugh/Ford hearings. That is #MeToo. He said that during the Thomas/Hill hearings, Arlen Spector hammered Hill in his questioning. Judge Nap pointed out that because of today's climate, Reps will likely not want to be seen as being insensitive to an alleged sexual assault victim, and treat Dr. Ford with kid gloves.

Well, the Republicans *are* a bunch of lily livered cowards, but they have to know that if they cave on Kavanaugh it will be seen by the Dems as a winning strategy, and they will do it will every Trump nominee.

 

[vraiblonde]

couldn't wait to use that, could ya?

I had it in my back pocket just waiting.

 

[stgislander]

Well, the Republicans *are* a bunch of lily livered cowards, but they have to know that if they cave on Kavanaugh it will be seen by the Dems as a winning strategy, and they will do it will every Trump nominee.

I'm thinking the job of "Hammer" will go to Ted Cruz.

 

[This_person]

They're too busy slaying lewks.

Ok, I'll bite....what's a lewk?

 

[GURPS]

the Alleged 'victim' so UNSURE of events how could she give cognitive testimony

 

[RoseRed]

They're too busy slaying lewks.

I had to look that one up!

 

[vraiblonde]

the Alleged 'victim' so UNSURE of events how could she give cognitive testimony

They are making those up right now.

 

[RoseRed]

They are making those up right now.

I suspect she was either hypnotized or consulted Madame Cleo.

 

[transporter]

Why did Feinstein bring forward the accusation against Kavanaugh? She knew the damage would be done without ever having to prove anything. She also (and blasey-ford does too) knows that there is no way to disprove the allegation so neither she or blasey-ford will ever be held accountable. In the court of sexual allegations there is no innocent until proven guilty nor are there rules of evidence. Regardless of the outcome Kavanaugh's career has been forever tainted. Sad.

I am getting a kick out of reading these threads.

You people are so damned clueless...so blind...it is really, really sad.

Why did Feinstein do this? You people, you "informed voters", really don't understand much do you? It is obviously retaliation for Marrick Garland. You see actions have reactions...just like our idiot President and his idiotic tariffs. Garland should have received a vote.

This whole thing with Kavanaugh is disgusting...and utterly predictable. This is the garbage you people claim to hate so much...yet you all cheer on (and agitate for further childish behavior) when initiated by your side.

In actuality, the issue with Kavanaugh isn't something that may or may not have happened when he was a teenager. The issue with Kavanaugh is did he or did he not lie before the Senate when he was put up for the position he currently holds? But that issue...an actual, real issue that should be answered...isn't even being considered.

 

[This_person]

I am getting a kick out of reading these threads.

You people are so damned clueless...so blind...it is really, really sad.

Why did Feinstein do this? You people, you "informed voters", really don't understand much do you? It is obviously retaliation for Marrick Garland. You see actions have reactions...just like our idiot President and his idiotic tariffs. Garland should have received a vote.

This whole thing with Kavanaugh is disgusting...and utterly predictable. This is the garbage you people claim to hate so much...yet you all cheer on (and agitate for further childish behavior) when initiated by your side.

In actuality, the issue with Kavanaugh isn't something that may or may not have happened when he was a teenager. The issue with Kavanaugh is did he or did he not lie before the Senate when he was put up for the position he currently holds? But that issue...an actual, real issue that should be answered...isn't even being considered.

I used to think you had some sense, but I can see you do not.

When we ask "why did Feinstein do this", it is rhetorical. We KNOW the answer. The answer is that it is an attack for political purposes and political purposes only - they lie, cheat, steal, etc., because to them the ends justify the means. To a good, honest person, they do not, but to liberals they do.

That you can't see the obvious in this is really sad for you.


BTW, it isn't considered because it was, rejected out of hand as not true, and is over. Only the stupid feel there's still a question there.

 

[vraiblonde]

It is obviously retaliation for Marrick Garland.

Gee, Captain Obvious, really???

I'm pretty sure everyone understands that. It's nothing new. Just like you've been trying to get revenge for impeaching Bill Clinton by scrambling for reasons to impeach a Republican president. You people will happily destroy someone's life over an unrelated perceived slight - we've seen this show before.

 

[GURPS]

I am getting a kick out of reading these threads.

You people are so damned clueless...so blind...it is really, really sad.

Really, you seem fairly angry ... Anything that does NOT Conform to YOUR World View is Stupid or Propaganda - most times both

Why did Feinstein do this? You people, you "informed voters", really don't understand much do you?

No #### Munch, we know exactly why this happened - Progressives are desperate to keep another Conservative off The Supreme Court

It is obviously retaliation for Marrick Garland. You see actions have reactions

Really :shrug:

... just like our idiot President and his idiotic tariffs.

Tariffs have NOTHING to do with THIS Conversation ... get back to me in a yr and bitch about Tariffs then

Garland should have received a vote.

Bugger Off YOU - Garland was OWED NOTHING ...
NOR was Obama - Advise and Consent - look it up

This whole thing with Kavanaugh is disgusting ... and utterly predictable.

well GD something I can agree with ....

This is the garbage you people claim to hate so much ... yet you all cheer on (and agitate for further childish behavior) when initiated by your side.

Really when has someone on the GOP Side of the aisle made FALSE Sexual Harassment Claims - lied about wither someone PAID their Taxes Or Not

In actuality, the issue with Kavanaugh isn't something that may or may not have happened when he was a teenager. The issue with Kavanaugh is did he or did he not lie before the Senate when he was put up for the position he currently holds? But that issue ... an actual, real issue that should be answered ... isn't even being considered.

WT Actual F u c k are you going on about What ISSUE ? :shrug:
Be Specific Sugar Tits Where Did BK Lie

 

[Hijinx]

I am getting a kick out of reading these threads.

You people are so damned clueless...so blind...it is really, really sad.

Why did Feinstein do this? You people, you "informed voters", really don't understand much do you? It is obviously retaliation for Marrick Garland. You see actions have reactions...just like our idiot President and his idiotic tariffs. Garland should have received a vote.

This whole thing with Kavanaugh is disgusting...and utterly predictable. This is the garbage you people claim to hate so much...yet you all cheer on (and agitate for further childish behavior) when initiated by your side.

In actuality, the issue with Kavanaugh isn't something that may or may not have happened when he was a teenager. The issue with Kavanaugh is did he or did he not lie before the Senate when he was put up for the position he currently holds? But that issue...an actual, real issue that should be answered...isn't even being considered.

So Garland was pay back for Bork and Kavanaugh is pay back for Garland, and if true it shows what a putrid Senate we have.
Feinstein is a pathetic Leech.
Sucking the blood from her constituents and doing dirty work for the Dem Party.
I doubt Garland was even given a thought when this nomination came up.

The Democrats do not want an honest Justice appointed, they want one that they own.

They have two that they own lock , stock, and Barrel (the 2 muff divers)
They have a partial deed to the old senile lady, Ginsberg, and Breyer.
If they can get one more they will have a liberal lock on the SCOTUS.

That is why the Democrats are about to crap themselves.

If the President can get in 1 more it will hurt the liberal lean and perhaps mean more fair rulings.
Then if Ginsburg croaks in the near future the SCOTUS will be free from political influence by the socialists and liberals.