Washington Post Targets Verizon With Unverified Comments From Anonymous Internet Crank

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
The episode involves a story on based on an alarming complaint that an anonymous person posted on Reddit about Verizon. The story, “Verizon denies allegations that it’s degrading mobile data service for Hurricane Florence victims,” was written by business and technology policy reporter Brian Fung. It provides a curious case study of how one comment from an anonymous agitator can generate a negative headline in one of the most authoritative newspapers in America.

Fung’s article relied on a single Reddit post from an anonymous source alleging that Verizon deprioritized his mobile data in the wake of Hurricane Florence. The implicit justification for writing a Post story was that a popular website BoingBoing linked to the Reddit post.

The Post lent this allegation its institutional legitimacy by asking Verizon to respond to the anonymous complaint. The story did not mention that the critical comment was posted by a self-identified “serial liar” on a subreddit dedicated to promoting socialist thought and dismantling capitalism.


http://thefederalist.com/2018/09/24...unverified-comments-anonymous-internet-crank/


further commentary ABOUT Reddit .......... [and yes Reddit is Over Run with Progressives and ShareBlue Types where you can be kicked out of a Sub-Reddit just for having posted or subscribed to r/Conservative or r/The_Donald]


Amplifying People Who Want to Ruin Capitalism

The Reddit post Fung cited in his story was authored by user “AbeFroman21,” a reference to the fictional “Sausage King of Chicago” in the 1986 film “Ferris Bueller’s Day Off.” The post has multiple comments advocating the assassination of FCC Chairman Ajit Pai and general criticism of “capitalist phone networks.”

A cursory glance at the post shows it was posted in a subreddit called r/LateStageCapitalism, described as promoting a “SAFE SPACE for socialist discussion.” The subreddit explicitly promotes its philosophy as rooted in “broad-based anti-capitalist though, with an underlying Marxist tendency that is steeped in intersectionalist Critical Theory.” The guidelines for posting in the subreddit—along with prominent links to the communist writings of Karl Marx, Friederich Engels, and Vladimir Lenin—might have raised a red flag that this source may have a particular bias worth mentioning (or simply discounting this source altogether).

“Support for capitalism—and the political parties which uphold it—is strictly prohibited… anti-socialist and anti-communist comments are also forbidden,” according to the subreddit’s rules. “This is a space for all comrades and all leftists. You are allowed to offer nuanced critiques of other leftist positions, but undermining socialism and/or communism as a whole is not permitted.”
 
Last edited:

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
It provides a curious case study of how one comment from an anonymous agitator can generate a negative headline in one of the most authoritative newspapers in America.

The Washington Post-----one of the most authoritative newspapers in America.

Oh Sheit, that is funny. Bwahahahahahahahahahhaha.
 

glhs837

Power with Control
The Washington Post-----one of the most authoritative newspapers in America.

Oh Sheit, that is funny. Bwahahahahahahahahahhaha.

So, which papers do you consider as equally authoritative or more authoritative. I have no great love for the Post, but it's name carries weight on a naitonal level.
 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
So, which papers do you consider as equally authoritative or more authoritative. I have no great love for the Post, but it's name carries weight on a naitonal level.

I will be very honest with you and say that I don't trust any of them.
They all have proven their bias IMO .
Certainly the name carries weight, and that is one of the problems.

When a media outlet carries great weight it also should carry the responsibility to be fair and honest and report the news and not try to make the news.

William Randolph Hearst Once said , 'You furnish the pictures and I'll furnish the war.'
He was famous for Yellow Journalism.

IMO the Washington Post, the New York Times and many news papers and TV new outlets today practice Yellow Journalism and have turned into a science to be used against Donald Trump and Americans who voted against Hillary Clinton.
 

glhs837

Power with Control
I will be very honest with you and say that I don't trust any of them.
They all have proven their bias IMO .
Certainly the name carries weight, and that is one of the problems.

When a media outlet carries great weight it also should carry the responsibility to be fair and honest and report the news and not try to make the news.

William Randolph Hearst Once said , 'You furnish the pictures and I'll furnish the war.'
He was famous for Yellow Journalism.

IMO the Washington Post, the New York Times and many news papers and TV new outlets today practice Yellow Journalism and have turned into a science to be used against Donald Trump and Americans who voted against Hillary Clinton.

See, you can't confuse how you feel about a thing with the perception of that thing when discussing it's influence. I think IOS is a horrible UI, but I know thats me. It's the Holy Grail of interface for millions upon millions of people around the globe. The point of the original post is to demonstrate exactly how they are misusing that weight to make the news instead of reporting it.
 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
See, you can't confuse how you feel about a thing with the perception of that thing when discussing it's influence. I think IOS is a horrible UI, but I know thats me. It's the Holy Grail of interface for millions upon millions of people around the globe. The point of the original post is to demonstrate exactly how they are misusing that weight to make the news instead of reporting it.

I know all about the great influence of these media outlets.
It uses it's influence to affect the outcomes of elections and it's bias to help with their liberal agenda.
I don't confuse how I feel with the feeling of the millions of people who read their trash.
I can just tell you that IMO they are not legitimate sources of information because of their bias.
If others want to read their propaganda and believe it that is up to them.
 
Top