so you admit Obama was a liar
When was Obama or Clinton held to these mystical higher standards
Obama ran guns to Mexico resulting in the death of a Border Patrol Agent and others
Used the IRS as a Political Weapon against Groups He did not Like
Clinton as a Supervisor aka the Boss, was involved sexually with a subordinate employee in his office - that violates Federal Fraternization Policy
quickly leading to sexual harassment claims
So What .... a Matter of LEGAL Opinion
so far the DA for the Southern District of NY is of the OPINION he has a CASE ... a case he has to make in Court
you can cheer and salivate rubbing your hands together laughing manically at Trump's Misfortune but the fact Individual-1 was named a co conspirator is worth about as much as the paper it was printed on
Cohen is a Lair, a tax cheat and guilty of other crimes ... we should now suddenly believe he is telling the Truth
“Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus,”
In My Humble Opinion Cohen would say anything to minimize his pending Jail Time for Tax Fraud
As For The DA for the SDNY his case all hinges on PROVING Intent ...
was Trumps payment to his lawyer a Campaign Contribution [did the money come from Campaign Funds or Trumps Personal Account]
Trump Intended to 'influence the election' hiding his affair
- a spurious claim at best considering Trump, his life as someone 3 times divorced
- would have the news of the 12 yr old affair changed the minds of Potential Trump Voters after 'pussy grabbing' audio had already leaked
Name Any Other politician Convicted and Jailed for Campaign Finance Violations
Your Boy Obama paid a 375k fine on $ 2 mil in irregularities
The $130,000 Stormy Daniels payoff: Was it a campaign expenditure?
Would Cohen have paid Daniels anyway?
The central legal question is whether Cohen paid Daniels to help Trump’s campaign, or to help Trump. Experts agreed that the most significant consequences hinge on this point.
The Federal Election Commission rules examine this through the lens of whether campaign funds have been put to personal use; the commission applies something called the Irrespective Test. The law says that something is personal if it’s "any commitment, obligation, or expense of a person that would exist irrespective of the candidate’s election campaign."
By that standard, said Emory School of Law professor Michael Kang, "the circumstances and context here are suspicious," but it’s no slam-dunk that the payment was an expenditure on behalf of the campaign.
[clip]
"Daniels herself has said that years before Trump declared for president, she was threatened about not disclosing any affair, suggesting, if she's telling the truth, that her silence was desired long before Trump became a candidate," Smith said.
I did not have sex with that woman - yeah that is misspeaking
If You Like Your Doctor You Can Keep Your Doctor - yeah that is misspeaking
when Trump LIES about something that matters beyond the size of a crowd, call me