That’s how we know your a moron or paid to post lies.
You claim to be intelligent but can’t understand the significance of the paper that paid to hide stories about candidate Trump turning on him?
You’ve always been an insufferable wanna be know it all but I though you were marginally smarter than the likes of preacherjk, malice and Hijinx but I guess not
Nice Ad Hominem Attack .... and deflection ... YOU have nothing so you resort to personal attacks
“As a part of the agreement, AMI admitted that it made the $150,000 payment in concert with a candidate’s presidential campaign, and in order to ensure that the woman [Karen McDougal] did not publicize damaging allegations about the candidate before the 2016 presidential election. AMI further admitted that its principal purpose in making the payment was to suppress the woman’s story so as to prevent it from influencing the election.”
The Assumption being such a story with have an affect on The Election
I'm not buying this Characterization of Events ... we shall see what happens in Court
Dershowitz: Candidate Entitled To Pay Hush Money, Committed No Election Crime
DERSHOWITZ: The president doesn't break the law if, as a candidate, he contributes to his own campaign. So if he gave $1 million to two women as hush money, there would be in crime. If he directed his lawyer to do it, and he would compensate the lawyer, he's committed no crime.
The only crime is if a third-party, namely, Cohen, on his own, contributed to a campaign, that would be a campaign contribution. So it is a catch-22 for the prosecution. iI they claim that the president authorized him to do it or directed him to do it, it is not a crime for anybody. If Cohen did it on his own, then it is a crime for Cohen but not the president.
This is going to be a very difficult case for the prosecution to make, precisely because the laws on election are so convoluted.
