Trump Inauguration committee under federal investigation

Sapidus

Well-Known Member
In yet more bad news for Trump his inauguration spending is now under federal investigation.


So let’s review he is personally under federal investigation , his “charity” is under investigation , his businesses are under investigation and now his inauguaration committee.

Why would you continue to defend a man who has been named in two federal crimes and counting ?

https://www-m.cnn.com/2018/12/13/po...tigation/index.html?r=https://www.google.com/
 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
In yet more bad news for Trump his inauguration spending is now under federal investigation.


So let’s review he is personally under federal investigation , his “charity” is under investigation , his businesses are under investigation and now his inauguaration committee.

Why would you continue to defend a man who has been named in two federal crimes and counting ?

https://www-m.cnn.com/2018/12/13/po...tigation/index.html?r=https://www.google.com/

No surprise here. They investigate Trump when he goes to take a piss.
The Never Trumpers are determined to screw him like they screwed Sarah Palin into giving up being Governor.

Government lawyers are sitting around with their thumbs up their ass being paid by the taxpayers.
It costs the Trump haters NOTHING to come up with Fallacious and made up charges.
For each charge the one charged has to hire attorneys at their own cost.

Sarah reached a point where she could no longer afford the costs of litigation. She was forced to give up the Governorship.
Now Trump is much richer than Sarah, but his funds are not unlimited either, and he faces 6 more years of these socoksuckers., and their unfounded charges.

They are out to destroy him financially in some of the dirtiest political actions ever seen.
I only wish the new Attorney General would start making them pay for this, by reciprocating, and using Government Attorneys to go after the Dems.
Start with Hillary and Obama, then go on to Chucky and Nancy.
 

Sapidus

Well-Known Member
God you’re a moron. You are so stupid you probably will send Trump a donation from your welfare check soon
 

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
In yet more bad news for Trump his inauguration spending is now under federal investigation.


So let’s review he is personally under federal investigation , his “charity” is under investigation , his businesses are under investigation and now his inauguaration committee.

Why would you continue to defend a man who has been named in two federal crimes and counting ?

https://www-m.cnn.com/2018/12/13/po...tigation/index.html?r=https://www.google.com/

Inauguration. Wow. THAT was fast.

We now have a New York Attorney General who claims she'll investigate everything under the sun regarding Trump.
Aside from the sheer partisan nature of that remark, it also demonstrates you don't need smoke to investigate a fire.
So until there's something to brag about - I'm not concerned at all.

You seem to be of the opinion that an investigation is particularly damning - except that if nothing is found, that
must mean - a la Benghazi - that there's zero culpability. The Clinton Foundation has been investigated - does
that make THEM guilty of anything?

I'm UTTERLY unconcerned about "named in crimes" as well. Charge him or find a crime. The left has cried wolf
so many times, I couldn't care less about another issue.
 

Gilligan

#*! boat!
PREMO Member

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
[TWITTER]https://twitter.com/ReaganBattalion/status/1073333805564526593[/TWITTER]
 

CPUSA

Well-Known Member
In yet more bad news for Trump his inauguration spending is now under federal investigation.


So let’s review he is personally under federal investigation , his “charity” is under investigation , his businesses are under investigation and now his inauguaration committee.

Why would you continue to defend a man who has been named in two federal crimes and counting ?

https://www-m.cnn.com/2018/12/13/po...tigation/index.html?r=https://www.google.com/

Maybe for the same reasons you constantly defend the Magical Mulatto Muslim and his merry band of criminals.
Just because you are gullible enough to fall for this witch hunt Sadpussi, doesn't mean it's going to produce any actual crimes.
But you keep hoping that he goes down. We already know that, for you, it's not about railroading President Trump...it's about railroading ANY white person.
Just own up to your racism & bigotry, Aaron. Don't deny what you so obviously reveal about yourself
 

limblips

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
In yet more bad news for Trump his inauguration spending is now under federal investigation.


So let’s review he is personally under federal investigation , his “charity” is under investigation , his businesses are under investigation and now his inauguaration committee.

Why would you continue to defend a man who has been named in two federal crimes and counting ?

https://www-m.cnn.com/2018/12/13/po...tigation/index.html?r=https://www.google.com/


They need to investigate the clinton inauguration finances! Oh wait. Nevermind.
 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
They need to investigate the clinton inauguration finances! Oh wait. Nevermind.

Didn't they just charge Obama $375,000 for his campaign finance irregularities.?

Trump should make a deal give them the $375,000 dollars and they leave him the phuck alone.
 

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
Obama's campaign finance irregularities, which was Hijinx's question, happened because of last minute donations and associated required reports were not turned in on time. Trumps campaign violations (so far) was for purposely paying off two women to keep their mouth shut.

Which is not illegal. And the connection to the campaign is a semantic one and not a financial one, as it's clear that money from the campaign wasn't used.

This is interesting when compared to John Edwards' case because the affair actually occurred during the early part of the campaign itself.
It wasn't just an encounter, it was a whole affair, and resulted in the birth of a love child, whom he denied.
He was STILL seeing her in 2007 when his wife was being treated for - and dying of - cancer.
When it came to light, there was clear evidence he'd used campaign funds to hide the entire affair.

Edwards ultimately paid no price for the events. He was found not guilty for one charge and a mistrial on the others.

The semantical thing with Trump is, is it illegal to use YOUR OWN MONEY for hush money if it affects the campaign.
It's dumb on two levels - it's clear that indiscretions had no effect on his campaign - and he used his own money - which
is even ok if for example, he spent his own money directly on his own campaign.

So I don't see anything coming of this. It's an extremely weak charge.
 

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
Obama's campaign finance irregularities, which was Hijinx's question, happened because of last minute donations and associated required reports were not turned in on time.

If memory serves - it was also because of donations that were not reported at all.
 

This_person

Well-Known Member
Obama's campaign finance irregularities, which was Hijinx's question, happened because of last minute donations and associated required reports were not turned in on time. Trumps campaign violations (so far) was for purposely paying off two women to keep their mouth shut.

"Required reporting not done" is also Cohen's case.
 
Top