MerF said:
Then tell them (us) not to go die for you. I was over there when I was below the drinking age, and we used to get pissed when we'd return home because we could no longer order a beer with dinner (over there, nobody cares).
Do you think this is the first time in our history that we have sent young men and women under the legal age for consuming alcohol to a hostile environment where the risk of life and limb was an everyday concern? You might not be old enough to recall, but it was like this back in the early 70s when we actually had an ongoing draft and right there after as we transitioned to the “all volunteer force”. Heck I have been deployed to “dry” locations many times where the host nation (Saudi Arabia) had strict alcohol laws that we had to comply with even though we were of legal drinking age.
Today we know better the risks of letting our youth drink. We have data that shows that the increase of the legal drinking age has resulted in a 30% decrease in alcohol related driving fatalities. That in and by itself should clearly indicate that it was a wise and correct decision.
Personally I wouldn’t mind letting those that are serving in the military legally drink on a military reservation in canteens and clubs regardless of their age, but most, if not all, bases comply with the current laws. Also I wouldn’t mind a general military exemption to the age restriction where upon presentation of a valid military ID card a serving member could imbibe at any public establishment. After all these folk have given of themselves to serve our nation, have undergone intense training regiments, have been given great responsibility advancing their maturity and this could be a minor reward for that service. With that said, this would have to be looked at very carefully before implementing as we have seen that the younger military members at times display many of the tendencies of the regular population and if it is later determined that there is an increase in alcohol related incidents involving those under the age of 21, then the ban should be re-established.