jlabsher
Sorry about that chief.
From the Balto Sun, another liberal rag!!!!!!!
It must be another part of the great liberal conspiracy!
It must be another part of the great liberal conspiracy!
Fox news views most malinformed of all
- Thread starter jlabsher
- Start date
Don't bring that weak-azz sh*t in here.
The rest of the story:
The rest of the story:
According to this study and my calculations, 61.5% of all Americans who watch or read the news, hold these "incorrect" beliefs. Propaganda - Fox is only 20 points above the average and closely followed by the liberals' beloved CBS.
I learned that from watching Blix give his testimony, not from Fox News.
Nobody learned that from Fox, either. The reporters and talk guys went on and on about how the French, Germans, Russians, etc, were against the freedom operation.
Someone please help me understand this statement.
J
justhangn
Guest
"either you believe the
we spew or it's wrong".
I hate to disappoint you all but here is the truth of the matter.
The malinformed citizens are the ones who still use the term "liberal" and "conservative". Why? Well for starters, there is no such thing as a liberal or conservative party in the U.S. The liberal party only exists in Canada, Great Britian and 1800s U.S. The term liberal as you use it today was invented by that pill popping druggie junkie Rush Limbaugh. Why you would want to associate yourselves with him still, one wonders.
Political debates are childish. You disagree? Take a look at the new Governor of California and tell me any debate was worth going through on that election.
The malinformed citizens are the ones who still use the term "liberal" and "conservative". Why? Well for starters, there is no such thing as a liberal or conservative party in the U.S. The liberal party only exists in Canada, Great Britian and 1800s U.S. The term liberal as you use it today was invented by that pill popping druggie junkie Rush Limbaugh. Why you would want to associate yourselves with him still, one wonders.
Political debates are childish. You disagree? Take a look at the new Governor of California and tell me any debate was worth going through on that election.
Steve
Enjoying life!
http
Davis was in the State Governor's Office since 1995, when he took over as Lt. Governor. I guess he was really going to fix things this time around. Could Arnold possibly do any worse?
And in the "I love the Internet" department, a lot can be found in this thread concerning the origins of the terms "liberal" and "conservative":
http://answers.google.com/answers/main?cmd=threadview&id=234722
Davis was in the State Governor's Office since 1995, when he took over as Lt. Governor. I guess he was really going to fix things this time around. Could Arnold possibly do any worse?
And in the "I love the Internet" department, a lot can be found in this thread concerning the origins of the terms "liberal" and "conservative":
http://answers.google.com/answers/main?cmd=threadview&id=234722
Re: Otter
Relax tough guy. That silence was the Dillon 904 and happy hour, kay?
And as far as a response, what response are you looking for? Did you ask a question? Make a point?
If you are refering to your Ahnold comment, you are making my point for me. When someone wins a governor election after announcing for 1 month, campaigning for about 4 minutes and managing to skip all the debates and he still wins, obviously politics just don't matter.
If you are refering to your Google answers, I specifically said the "term as you use it today". I don't need Google to educate me on the history of the political terms, I remember quite well from school, as obviously, you don't.
Oh yea, BTW. Rush just came out of the closet you repugs. Ha Ha, what a coinkidink!
http://www.cnn.com/2003/SHOWBIZ/10/10/rush.limbaugh/index.html
(Just kidding about the repug, just gotta take what you can get. Don't come back with some democrap comment. I could give 2 sch!ts (see above)).
Originally posted by Steve
As you can see, I never got a response from http after I posted. Just goes to show how a Dem acts once he has to face some real debatable evidence.
Relax tough guy. That silence was the Dillon 904 and happy hour, kay?
And as far as a response, what response are you looking for? Did you ask a question? Make a point?
If you are refering to your Ahnold comment, you are making my point for me. When someone wins a governor election after announcing for 1 month, campaigning for about 4 minutes and managing to skip all the debates and he still wins, obviously politics just don't matter.
If you are refering to your Google answers, I specifically said the "term as you use it today". I don't need Google to educate me on the history of the political terms, I remember quite well from school, as obviously, you don't.
Oh yea, BTW. Rush just came out of the closet you repugs. Ha Ha, what a coinkidink!
http://www.cnn.com/2003/SHOWBIZ/10/10/rush.limbaugh/index.html
(Just kidding about the repug, just gotta take what you can get. Don't come back with some democrap comment. I could give 2 sch!ts (see above)).
Steve
Enjoying life!
Thanks for the compliment. Never thought of myself as a tough guy.
As far as the post and response, you said that Rush coined the term 'liberal'. I was providing evidence to the contrary. That's all. You call it the "term (we) use today". I used that link to point out that the term has meant different things over the course of 150 years. But, to get down to basics...
Liberal, to support liberation or change, bucks against the "norms" of society, whatever they may be at any given time. If that means killing babies as they are coming down the birth canal, or freeing opressed, or taking from the rich to liberate the poor, well, if the shoe fits...
Conservative, to deflect change and hold onto what is considered "tried and true", like strong family values, hard work to achieve goals, and standing on your own two feet, well, if the shoe fits...
Arnold? I didn't vote for him. But it is a telling sign.
School? History goes back a little before Rush Limbaugh, or Bill O' for that matter.
The top is slowing; spin it again http!!
As far as the post and response, you said that Rush coined the term 'liberal'. I was providing evidence to the contrary. That's all. You call it the "term (we) use today". I used that link to point out that the term has meant different things over the course of 150 years. But, to get down to basics...
Liberal, to support liberation or change, bucks against the "norms" of society, whatever they may be at any given time. If that means killing babies as they are coming down the birth canal, or freeing opressed, or taking from the rich to liberate the poor, well, if the shoe fits...
Conservative, to deflect change and hold onto what is considered "tried and true", like strong family values, hard work to achieve goals, and standing on your own two feet, well, if the shoe fits...
Arnold? I didn't vote for him. But it is a telling sign.
School? History goes back a little before Rush Limbaugh, or Bill O' for that matter.
The top is slowing; spin it again http!!
Steve
Enjoying life!
HTTP
Dillon 904
I plead ignorance to this. What does Dillon 904 mean?
When someone wins a governor election after announcing for 1 month, campaigning for about 4 minutes and managing to skip all the debates and he still wins, obviously politics just don't matter.
Not unless Bustamante had won. Then you'd be singing a quite different song, I'm sure.
I don't need Google to educate me on the history of the political terms, I remember quite well from school, as obviously, you don't.
Including links to supporting information is useful in a debate "today". It means you are not just pulling sheet out of you azz to bully people into submission. Read my post, and the link information again. Your response holds no water.
Oh yea, BTW. Rush just came out of the closet you repugs. Ha Ha, what a coinkidink!
For a second, I thought you meant he admitted he was gay!! Admitting to drug use is not usually referred to as "coming out of the closet". But I could be wrong. I'm not edumacated, apparently.
Dillon 904
I plead ignorance to this. What does Dillon 904 mean?
When someone wins a governor election after announcing for 1 month, campaigning for about 4 minutes and managing to skip all the debates and he still wins, obviously politics just don't matter.
Not unless Bustamante had won. Then you'd be singing a quite different song, I'm sure.
I don't need Google to educate me on the history of the political terms, I remember quite well from school, as obviously, you don't.
Including links to supporting information is useful in a debate "today". It means you are not just pulling sheet out of you azz to bully people into submission. Read my post, and the link information again. Your response holds no water.
Oh yea, BTW. Rush just came out of the closet you repugs. Ha Ha, what a coinkidink!
For a second, I thought you meant he admitted he was gay!!
Admitting to drug use is not usually referred to as "coming out of the closet". But I could be wrong. I'm not edumacated, apparently.Again, I really don't have a problem with any of the above. My point is I don't think there is much of an argument with any liberal vs. conservative debate when it comes to the PRESS and political elections, because 99% of the average person has no idea about the origins and history of politcal parties in the U.S. So people like Rush, Bill and Hamblin in the 90s have dumbdowned the terms for the dumb.
Thanks for your definition of the two terms snapshot'd at some point over the last 150 years, but again I don't need them, and also I think you simplified them a bit much.
For instance on your birth canal argument, there are plenty of REPUBLICAN VOTING women who are very much in support of abortion (if not most).
Also, Arnold may be a REPUBLICAN but he is self-admitted a very "liberal" one.
I originally posted in this thread because the argument is so flippin stupid, I can't believe people are still bringing it up. Every paper self-admits they have a political slant as does every news broadcast and news personality. Been there done that. If it bothers you, watch or read something else. Who gives a flyn f%$&. Dumb topic.
Thanks for your definition of the two terms snapshot'd at some point over the last 150 years, but again I don't need them, and also I think you simplified them a bit much.
For instance on your birth canal argument, there are plenty of REPUBLICAN VOTING women who are very much in support of abortion (if not most).
Also, Arnold may be a REPUBLICAN but he is self-admitted a very "liberal" one.
I originally posted in this thread because the argument is so flippin stupid, I can't believe people are still bringing it up. Every paper self-admits they have a political slant as does every news broadcast and news personality. Been there done that. If it bothers you, watch or read something else. Who gives a flyn f%$&. Dumb topic.
Re: HTTP
Dillon 904 is my commuter bus. In otherwords, I didn't respond because I was on my way home.
As far as Bustawhatever, what don't you understand? I am saying that Ahnold winning this thing with little or not effort is a sign of the changing times where political party affiliation and experience and strength are playing less and less of a role. Remember, California is a democratic State.
As far as the links, who cares? I am not arguing with you. You are missing my point.
As far as coming out of the closet, gays, drugs, wife-beating, rape, embezzlement, its all the same. You know what I mean.
Originally posted by Steve
Dillon 904
I plead ignorance to this. What does Dillon 904 mean?
When someone wins a governor election after announcing for 1 month, campaigning for about 4 minutes and managing to skip all the debates and he still wins, obviously politics just don't matter.
Not unless Bustamante had won. Then you'd be singing a quite different song, I'm sure.
I don't need Google to educate me on the history of the political terms, I remember quite well from school, as obviously, you don't.
Including links to supporting information is useful in a debate "today". It means you are not just pulling sheet out of you azz to bully people into submission. Read my post, and the link information again. Your response holds no water.
Oh yea, BTW. Rush just came out of the closet you repugs. Ha Ha, what a coinkidink!
For a second, I thought you meant he admitted he was gay!!
Dillon 904 is my commuter bus. In otherwords, I didn't respond because I was on my way home.
As far as Bustawhatever, what don't you understand? I am saying that Ahnold winning this thing with little or not effort is a sign of the changing times where political party affiliation and experience and strength are playing less and less of a role. Remember, California is a democratic State.
As far as the links, who cares? I am not arguing with you. You are missing my point.
As far as coming out of the closet, gays, drugs, wife-beating, rape, embezzlement, its all the same. You know what I mean.
Steve
Enjoying life!
HTTP
There are plenty of dumb topics every day on here. Its called discourse. That is what attracts so many here. The ability to discuss the day's events.
I am not for abortion. I know there are Rep. women that do. That is their decision. I just feel that killing any innocent is horrific, for whatever reason. And by innocent, I mean truly innocent. Death row inmates would fall into that category as well; not the 'players of the system' but those cases that truly reflect the evidence to support doubt. But I would not say that most Rep. women support abortion, but we'll leave that alone.
I agree that Arnold is a more "liberal" Republican. (You used the description of him first.)
This whole thing doesn't bother me enough to "read something else"; again, this is a forum for discourse. Unfortunately, it is rarely used for that purpose.
There are plenty of dumb topics every day on here. Its called discourse. That is what attracts so many here. The ability to discuss the day's events.
I am not for abortion. I know there are Rep. women that do. That is their decision. I just feel that killing any innocent is horrific, for whatever reason. And by innocent, I mean truly innocent. Death row inmates would fall into that category as well; not the 'players of the system' but those cases that truly reflect the evidence to support doubt. But I would not say that most Rep. women support abortion, but we'll leave that alone.
I agree that Arnold is a more "liberal" Republican. (You used the description of him first.)
This whole thing doesn't bother me enough to "read something else"; again, this is a forum for discourse. Unfortunately, it is rarely used for that purpose.
Hessian
Well-Known Member
I'll take a guess here...Http has a sticker on the back of his foreign made car..."Mean People Suck"
Has anyone evr found a happy Liberal? Doesn't exist! There is always a complaint, a rejection, a chuckle at the disgrace of anything...
That is why I generally don't waste my time on Discourse with them...
They're Lost
Bitter,
Mocking ...
and they want everyone to admire their sneering. sulking positon.
real attractive huh?
Has anyone evr found a happy Liberal? Doesn't exist! There is always a complaint, a rejection, a chuckle at the disgrace of anything...
That is why I generally don't waste my time on Discourse with them...
They're Lost
Bitter,
Mocking ...
and they want everyone to admire their sneering. sulking positon.
real attractive huh?