Yes, It's Possible to Hack the Election

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
Yes, It's Possible to Hack the Election


The U.S., according to media reports, hacked in to the Iranian nuclear centrifuge control system even though the entire system was air-gapped from the internet. The Russians, according to authoritative accounts, hacked into the Pentagon’s SIPRNet, a secret-level system separate from the internet. North Koreans, computer forensics experts have told me, penetrated SWIFT, the international banking exchange system. Iranians allegedly wiped clean all software on over 30,000 devices in the Aramco oil company. The White House, the State Department and your local fast food joint have all been hacked. Need I go on?

Now consider that a majority of states use some kind of combination of electronic voting and a type of paper trail, but there is no standard nationwide. In most states the data that are used to determine who won an election are processed by networked, computerized devices. There are almost no locations that exclusively use paper ballots. Some states allow direct from home voting over the internet. Others employ electronic voting machines that produce no paper trail, therefore there is nothing to count or recount and no way to ensure that what a voter intended is what was recorded and transmitted.

Some systems produce a paper ballot of record, but that paper is kept only for a recount; votes are recorded by a machine such as an optical scanner and then stored as electronic digits. The counting of the paper ballots of record — when there are such things — is exceedingly rare and is almost never done for verification in the absence of a recount demand.

The verification systems in place in most states can check only two things well. First, they can provide a basis for comparing the number of people who showed up and were allowed to vote at a location with the voter total reported at the end of the day by that precinct. Second, they can compare the total votes for a candidate reported by each precinct to the state capital against the number that the capital says it received from each location.
 

tommyjo

New Member
Given the current state of the race for President: Mr. Trump is significantly behind in almost every national poll and is significantly behind in most of the so called battleground states...

If the election were held today, the only evidence of a "hack job" would be a victory by Mr. Trump. In case you haven't been paying attention, Mr. Trump has been assisted by the Russians in the hack against the DNC and Mr. Trump publically called for the Russians to hack into Ms. Clinton's system to retrieve her deleted emails.

So, while absolutely anything IS possible, that doesn't mean anything WILL happen. And, in this case, Mr. Trump would be the benefactor not victim of, outside electronic election tampering.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
:oldman:



exactly the response I was expecting from the left

Donald Wins = Russian Hack JOB
 

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
and Mr. Trump publically called for the Russians to hack into Ms. Clinton's system to retrieve her deleted emails.


Got a quote, miss "Did you read..."? He said nothing even close. The idea came up that they'd already hacked her private server - which is no longer available for anyone to hack - so he quipped that THEY might release the deleted emails.

[FONT=&quot]"Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing,"

Now does that sound more like it? Yet another example of liberals quoting what their handlers tell them, rather than looking it up themselves.[/FONT]
 
Top