‘Not Exonerated’ Is Not a Standard Any Free Country Should Accept

somdwatch

Well-Known Member
You must be a slow reader, the report isn’t that long. And it’s not about the lives of those in DC.


It’s sad you want to spend your life talking about the report and defend8ng trump as if you knew something, but refuse to actually do the homework.

Why would you do the homework when the whole reason for "going to school" was developed from False information? The DOSSIER fool.
 

Midnightrider

Well-Known Member
Why would you do the homework when the whole reason for "going to school" was developed from False information? The DOSSIER fool.
To be informed. You idiots are sucking on the sudsy yellow propaganda teat instead of thinking (and reading) for yourselves.

BTW, Mueller was clear that he found plenty Russian interference and lots of people were charged.
 

This_person

Well-Known Member
To be informed. You idiots are sucking on the sudsy yellow propaganda teat instead of thinking (and reading) for yourselves.

BTW, Mueller was clear that he found plenty Russian interference and lots of people were charged.
Name one American charged with Russian interference or action associated with interference
 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
Mueller was part of the "Deep State", he knew there was no crime.
No crime committed by Trump.

I can't say the same for Mueller, Comey, Hillary, Obama et.al.
 

BernieP

Resident PIA
Why would you do the homework when the whole reason for "going to school" was developed from False information? The DOSSIER fool.
Which was based on unverified data from Russia and funded by the DNC and the Clinton Campaign.
Oh, the Russians did screw with the election, mainly because people were to stupid to see what was going on.
The MSM was so quick to jump on negative information about Trump and defend Clinton that they forgot to use clear glass and verify the facts in their stories.
As fare exoneration, I tried to explain to someone on Facebook that they were following a false narrative.
Mueller was partially correct, the Justice Department has had a long standing policy of not indicting a sitting President.
But that has never stopped a prosecutor from issuing his findings in his report. If he had conclusive evidence (of any crime), it would be in the report, because the constitution gives the House the right to indict the president (impeach) and the Senate to hear the evidence and vote on removal from office. So Mueller, in his press conference left out the constitutional path that was and still is available. Rather he defended his non-committal statement on obstruction by using Justice Department Policy.
Again, while I don't like his use of Twitter and think his statements are not presidential, Trump pointed out that Mueller is part of the inner circle at the DOJ and he's a good friend of James Comey. He has ties to the intelligence community that is now being called on to defend it's use of FISA warrants. So he decided to lay down some cover fire.
He was simply accelerating what we all are betting will, Pelosi will back down and the House will go ahead and vote to impeach Trump.
This will give them a better standing with the courts in order to subpoena Trump's personal records. It's all a lead up to 2020 and to cover for the intelligence and justice agencies in regards to abuse of power and illegal activities in regards to domestic espeonage.
 

BOP

Well-Known Member
To be informed. You idiots are sucking on the sudsy yellow propaganda teat instead of thinking (and reading) for yourselves.

BTW, Mueller was clear that he found plenty Russian interference and lots of people were charged.
 

Attachments

  • messaging 101.jpg
    messaging 101.jpg
    17.1 KB · Views: 152

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
Which was based on unverified data from Russia and funded by the DNC and the Clinton Campaign.
Oh, the Russians did screw with the election, mainly because people were to stupid to see what was going on.
The MSM was so quick to jump on negative information about Trump and defend Clinton that they forgot to use clear glass and verify the facts in their stories.
As fare exoneration, I tried to explain to someone on Facebook that they were following a false narrative.
Mueller was partially correct, the Justice Department has had a long standing policy of not indicting a sitting President.
But that has never stopped a prosecutor from issuing his findings in his report. If he had conclusive evidence (of any crime), it would be in the report, because the constitution gives the House the right to indict the president (impeach) and the Senate to hear the evidence and vote on removal from office. So Mueller, in his press conference left out the constitutional path that was and still is available. Rather he defended his non-committal statement on obstruction by using Justice Department Policy.
Again, while I don't like his use of Twitter and think his statements are not presidential, Trump pointed out that Mueller is part of the inner circle at the DOJ and he's a good friend of James Comey. He has ties to the intelligence community that is now being called on to defend it's use of FISA warrants. So he decided to lay down some cover fire.
He was simply accelerating what we all are betting will, Pelosi will back down and the House will go ahead and vote to impeach Trump.
This will give them a better standing with the courts in order to subpoena Trump's personal records. It's all a lead up to 2020 and to cover for the intelligence and justice agencies in regards to abuse of power and illegal activities in regards to domestic espeonage.


This whole thing has been a flustercluck from beginning to end.
To accuse the President of trying to obstruct an investigation being held by a member of the deep state activities against him is absurd.
The whole bunch should be in jail for sedition, and Schiff and Nadler right there with them.

Watergate wasn't sh*t compared to this.

And to top it all off the man who spent millions of dollars and hired Democrat Attorneys to help him found nothing, Nada, zilch, and yet these people are still trying to shove this truckload of manure down the throats of Americans.
 

BernieP

Resident PIA
... and yet these people are still trying to shove this truckload of manure down the throats of Americans.
because it reinforces the premise that Trump is immoral and evil. At this point it's political, and primarily at people who would likely vote for the Democratic Party nominee.
It works well because the media is a willing cheerleader and the majority of Americans are lazy and clueless.

Notice that the Democrats running for president are attacking Fox News Channel, and the media celebrating.
They are trying to shut down dissenting voices before the primaries and elections start.

BTW, don't read that and assume I'm a Trump supporter. Not a huge fan of his "style". Some of his policies have panned out, can't complain about that.
 
This entire thread is moot. It's a forgone conclusion that the House WILL impeach President Trump. They do not need any evidence to do so, and if they DID need evidence, they would just create whatever they needed. The ultimate authority for determining whether an offense constitutes a ground for impeachment rests with Congress, so the President could be 100% innocent in every aspect of his life, and the House will still impeach him for whatever reason they want. That however is also moot, at least up to this upcoming election. If the Senate swings D, then the President WILL be impeached by the full Congress regardless of his actions
 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
I sure hope the Senate stays Republican and will turn down any attempt at impeachment.
If you thesis comes true it is not know what the Trump voters will do.
If Trump is removed from office by impeachment by democrat it's time for the sh*t to hit the fan---and hit it hard.
 
Top