Did you by any chance read the whole document or did you just cherry pick the part you wanted?
You said it, not me.
I'll leave the cherry picking of material fact as well as the aberration of undisputed, uncontroverted material fact to Judge Karen H. Abrams and her judicial colleagues who are willing to perpetuate these aberrations at the expense of the truth and the proper administration of justice.
The motivation for consciously and deliberately fabricating the factual record in a case? Rent money? The career of a local settlement attorney who is part of the inner circle? The possibility of reprimand and/or sanctions? Judicial collegiality at its worst?
It wouldn't be fair for me to speculate.
The degree of respect that I have for an individual judge is equal to that judge's degree of respect for the legal system and the ethical principles that are inherent with their position of public trust. I think your average citizen feels the same way.