15 Companies That May Not Survive 2009

nachomama

All Up In Your Grill
15 Companies That Might Not Survive 2009 - Yahoo! Finance

Rite Aid. (Ticker symbol: RAD; about 100,000 employees; 1-year stock-price decline: 92%). This drugstore chain tried to boost its performance by acquiring competitors Brooks and Eckerd in 2007. But there have been some nasty side effects, like a huge debt load that makes it the most leveraged drugstore chain in the U.S., according to Zacks Equity Research. That big retail investment came just as megadiscounter Wal-Mart was starting to sell prescription drugs, and consumers were starting to cut bank on spending. Management has twice lowered its outlook for 2009. Prognosis: Mounting losses, with no turnaround in sight.

Claire's Stores. (Privately owned; about 18,000 employees.) Leon Black's once-renowned private-equity firm, the Apollo Group, paid $3.1 billion for this trendy teen-focused accessory store in 2007, when buyout funds were bulging. But cash flow has been negative for much of the past year and analysts believe Claire's is close to defaulting on its debt. A horrible retail outlook for 2009 offers no relief, suggesting Claire's could follow Linens 'n Things - another Apollo purchase - and declare Chapter 11, possibly shuttering all of its 3,000-plus stores.

Chrysler. (Privately owned; about 55,000 employees). It's never a good sign when management insists the company is not going out of business, which is what CEO Bob Nardelli has been doing lately. Of the three Detroit automakers, Chrysler is the most endangered, with a product portfolio that's overreliant on gas-guzzling trucks and SUVs and almost totally devoid of compelling small cars. A recent deal with Fiat seems dubious, since the Italian automaker doesn't have to pony up any money, and Chrysler desperately needs cash. The company is quickly burning through $4 billion in government bailout money, and with car sales down 40 percent from recent peaks, Chrysler may be the weakling that can't cut it in tough times.

Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group. (DTG; about 7,000 employees; stock down 95%). This car-rental company is a small player compared to Enterprise, Hertz, and Avis Budget. It's also more reliant on leisure travelers, and therefore more susceptible to a downturn as consumers cut spending. Dollar Thrifty is also closely tied to Chrysler, which supplies 80 percent of its fleet. Moody's predicts that if Chrysler declares Chapter 11, Dollar Thrifty would suffer deeply as well.

Realogy Corp. (Privately owned; about 13,000 employees). It's the biggest real-estate brokerage firm in the country, but that's a bad thing when there are double-digit declines in both sales and prices, as there were in 2009. Realogy, which includes the Coldwell Banker, ERA, and Sotheby's franchises, also carries a high debt load, dating to its purchase by the Apollo Group in 2007 - the very moment when the housing market was starting to invert from a soaring ride into a sickening nosedive. Realogy has been trying to refinance much of its debt, prompting lawsuits. One deal was denied by a judge in December, reducing the firm's already tight wiggle room.

Station Casinos. (Privately owned, about 14,000 employees). Las Vegas has already been creamed by a biblical real-estate bust, and now it may face the loss of its home-grown gambling joints, too. Station - which runs 15 casinos off the strip that cater to locals - recently failed to make a key interest payment, which is often one of the last steps before a Chapter 11 filing. For once, the house seems likely to lose.

Loehmann's Capital Corp. (Privately owned; about 1,500 employees). This clothing chain has the right formula for lean times, offering women's clothing at discount prices. But the consumer pullback is hitting just about every retailer, and Loehmann's has a lot less cash to ride out a drought than competitors like Nordstrom Rack and TJ Maxx. If Loehmann's doesn't get additional financing in 2009 - a dicey proposition, given skyrocketing unemployment and plunging spending - the chain could run out of cash.

Sbarro. (Privately owned; about 5,500 employees). It's not the pizza that's the problem. Many of this chain's 1,100 storefronts are in malls, which is a double whammy: Traffic is down, since consumers have put away their wallets. Sbarro can't really boost revenue by adding a breakfast or late-night menu, like other chains have done. And competitors like Domino's and Pizza Hut have less debt and stronger cash flow, which could intensify pressure on Sbarro as key debt payments come due in 2009.

Six Flags. (SIX; about 30,000 employees; stock down 84%). This theme-park operator has been losing money for several years, and selling off properties to try to pay down debt and get back into the black. But the ride may end prematurely. Moody's expects cash flow to be negative in 2009, and if consumers aren't spending during the peak summer season, that could imperil the company's ability to pay debts coming due later this year and in 2010.

Blockbuster. (BBI; about 60,000 employees; stock down 57%). The video-rental chain has burned cash while trying to figure out how to maximize fees without alienating customers. Its operating income has started to improve just as consumers are cutting back, even on movies. Video stores in general are under pressure as they compete with cable and Internet operators offering the same titles. A key test of Blockbuster's viability will come when two credit lines expire in August. One possible outcome, according to Valueline, is that investors take the company private and then go public again when market conditions are better.

Krispy Kreme. (KKD; about 4,000 employees; stock down 50%). The donuts might be good, but Krispy Kreme overestimated Americans' appetite - and that's saying something. This chain overexpanded during the donut heyday of the 1990s - taking on a lot of debt - and now requires high volumes to meet expenses and interest payments. The company has cut costs and closed underperforming stores, but still hasn't earned an operating profit in three years. And now that consumers are cutting back on everything, such improvements may fail to offset top-line declines, leading Krispy Kreme to seek some kind of relief from lenders over the next year.

Landry's Restaurants. (LNY; about 17,000 employees; stock down 66%). This restaurant chain, which operates Chart House, Rainforest Café, and other eateries, needs $400 million in new financing to finalize a buyout deal dating to last June. If lenders come through, the company should have enough cash to ride out the recession. But at least two banks have already balked, leading to downgrades of the company's debt and the prospect of a cash-flow crunch.

Sirius Satellite Radio. (SIRI - parent company; about 1,000 employees; stock down 96%). The music rocks, but satellite radio has yet to be profitable, and huge contracts for performers like Howard Stern are looking unsustainable. Sirius is one of two satellite-radio services owned by parent company Sirius XM, which was formed when Sirius and XM merged last year. So far, the merger hasn't generated the savings needed to make the company profitable, and Moody's thinks there's a "high likelihood" that Sirius will fail to repay or refinance its debt in 2009. One outcome could be a takeover, at distressed prices, by other firms active in the satellite business.

Trump Entertainment Resorts Holdings. (TRMP; about 9,500 employees; stock down 94%). The casino company made famous by The Donald has received several extensions on interest payments, while it tries to sell at least one of its Atlantic City properties and pay down a stack of debt. But with casino buyers scarce, competition circling, and gamblers nursing their losses from the recession, Trump Entertainment may face long odds of skirting bankruptcy.

BearingPoint. (BGPT; about 16,000 employees; stock down 21%). This Virginia-based consulting firm, spun out of KPMG in 2001, is struggling to solve its own operating problems. The firm has consistently lost money, revenue has been falling, and management stopped issuing earnings guidance in 2008. Stable government contracts generate about 30 percent of the firm's business, but the firm may sell other divisions to help pay off debt. With a key interest payment due in April, management needs to hustle - or devise its own exit strategy.
 
Last edited:
15 Companies That Might Not Survive 2009 - Yahoo! Finance

Chrysler. (Privately owned; about 55,000 employees). It's never a good sign when management insists the company is not going out of business, which is what CEO Bob Nardelli has been doing lately. Of the three Detroit automakers, Chrysler is the most endangered, with a product portfolio that's overreliant on gas-guzzling trucks and SUVs and almost totally devoid of compelling small cars. A recent deal with Fiat seems dubious, since the Italian automaker doesn't have to pony up any money, and Chrysler desperately needs cash. The company is quickly burning through $4 billion in government bailout money, and with car sales down 40 percent from recent peaks, Chrysler may be the weakling that can't cut it in tough times.

They've only survived this long because we've refused to let them die. The moment the government decides to turn off the life support apparatuses, they'll probably finally succumb to the will of the market. It's ashame - their death could have been more dignified if they'd have had a DNR.

Six Flags. (SIX; about 30,000 employees; stock down 84%). This theme-park operator has been losing money for several years, and selling off properties to try to pay down debt and get back into the black. But the ride may end prematurely. Moody's expects cash flow to be negative in 2009, and if consumers aren't spending during the peak summer season, that could imperil the company's ability to pay debts coming due later this year and in 2010.

Them being on this list is interesting to me, in an inside joke kinda way.

Blockbuster. (BBI; about 60,000 employees; stock down 57%). The video-rental chain has burned cash while trying to figure out how to maximize fees without alienating customers. Its operating income has started to improve just as consumers are cutting back, even on movies. Video stores in general are under pressure as they compete with cable and Internet operators offering the same titles. A key test of Blockbuster's viability will come when two credit lines expire in August. One possible outcome, according to Valueline, is that investors take the company private and then go public again when market conditions are better.

Their attempts to create overly advantageous bulk pricing mechanisms in the last couple of years have smelled of desperation. Their industry is dying and they don't seem to have kept up with the innovation curve well enough to insure their survival.

Sirius Satellite Radio. (SIRI - parent company; about 1,000 employees; stock down 96%). The music rocks, but satellite radio has yet to be profitable, and huge contracts for performers like Howard Stern are looking unsustainable. Sirius is one of two satellite-radio services owned by parent company Sirius XM, which was formed when Sirius and XM merged last year. So far, the merger hasn't generated the savings needed to make the company profitable, and Moody's thinks there's a "high likelihood" that Sirius will fail to repay or refinance its debt in 2009. One outcome could be a takeover, at distressed prices, by other firms active in the satellite business.

I think the business will survive, but they may require re-organization that wipes out stockholder equity (I hope not, but most likely they will). The business model would seem to be viable going forward, but current debt obligations make their survival in present form very difficult. Someone was buying up a lot of their debt last week, possibly as a precursor to an acquisition attempt.

The FCC, and to a lesser extent the FTC, really did a number on them and stalled their merger for an unreasonable period of time. It's widely believed that such actions were politically motivated. If their merger hadn't been held up for a year and a half, they would most likely be in decent financial health today - or at least not on the verge of insolvency. It's just hard for a company to operate efficiently when it is in limbo for that long - especially a new company that hasn't solidified its cash flow situation yet. They couldn't make important operational decisions, and their marketing efforts were paralyzed.

The nature of their technology made timing critical for them in terms of getting their base established, and a year or two may have made the difference between goldmine and bust.

...
 

lips_sealed

i love a man's forearms
I have someone who kicked me off their myspace page and snubs me in public who works at Bearing Point, lols.


I would be willing to bet that it is not the person I know. I dont think they use my space.

and....what did you do that was so bad that they kicked you off their site:whistle:
 

nachomama

All Up In Your Grill
I would be willing to bet that it is not the person I know. I dont think they use my space.

and....what did you do that was so bad that they kicked you off their site:whistle:

He jacked pictures and posted them as "billboards" all up and down the information superhighway. :rolleyes:
 

jetmonkey

New Member
I would be willing to bet that it is not the person I know. I dont think they use my space.

and....what did you do that was so bad that they kicked you off their site:whistle:

I'm just
 

Attachments

  • fox_news_idiocracy.jpg
    fox_news_idiocracy.jpg
    34 KB · Views: 160

TWL

Kernel panic: Aiee.......
Blockbuster. (BBI; about 60,000 employees; stock down 57%). The video-rental chain has burned cash while trying to figure out how to maximize fees without alienating customers. Its operating income has started to improve just as consumers are cutting back, even on movies. Video stores in general are under pressure as they compete with cable and Internet operators offering the same titles. A key test of Blockbuster's viability will come when two credit lines expire in August. One possible outcome, according to Valueline, is that investors take the company private and then go public again when market conditions are better.

Their attempts to create overly advantageous bulk pricing mechanisms in the last couple of years have smelled of desperation. Their industry is dying and they don't seem to have kept up with the innovation curve well enough to insure their survival.
Time to close physical locations and solely 'rent' their wares on the 'net. Posibly even 86ing renting of physical media and start renting VOD. Team up with DirecTV, Comcast, Verizon FiOS, etc.

Sirius Satellite Radio. (SIRI - parent company; about 1,000 employees; stock down 96%). The music rocks, but satellite radio has yet to be profitable, and huge contracts for performers like Howard Stern are looking unsustainable. Sirius is one of two satellite-radio services owned by parent company Sirius XM, which was formed when Sirius and XM merged last year. So far, the merger hasn't generated the savings needed to make the company profitable, and Moody's thinks there's a "high likelihood" that Sirius will fail to repay or refinance its debt in 2009. One outcome could be a takeover, at distressed prices, by other firms active in the satellite business.

I think the business will survive, but they may require re-organization that wipes out stockholder equity (I hope not, but most likely they will). The business model would seem to be viable going forward, but current debt obligations make their survival in present form very difficult. Someone was buying up a lot of their debt last week, possibly as a precursor to an acquisition attempt.

The FCC, and to a lesser extent the FTC, really did a number on them and stalled their merger for an unreasonable period of time. It's widely believed that such actions were politically motivated. If their merger hadn't been held up for a year and a half, they would most likely be in decent financial health today - or at least not on the verge of insolvency. It's just hard for a company to operate efficiently when it is in limbo for that long - especially a new company that hasn't solidified its cash flow situation yet. They couldn't make important operational decisions, and their marketing efforts were paralyzed.

The nature of their technology made timing critical for them in terms of getting their base established, and a year or two may have made the difference between goldmine and bust.
That "someone" buying the debt is Charles Ergen of EchoStar and Dish Network. The fate of Sirius XM is pretty much up to him. Is he loaning to keep SIRI afloat or is he after acquiring the satellites/S-band spectrum at low market value? I'm betting on the former and bought in @ .13/share.
 
That "someone" buying the debt is Charles Ergen of EchoStar and Dish Network. The fate of Sirius XM is pretty much up to him. Is he loaning to keep SIRI afloat or is he after acquiring the satellites/S-band spectrum at low market value? I'm betting on the former and bought in @ .13/share.

Yeah, I know, I've been trading SIRI for quite a while.

It seems we're hoping for the same thing. SIRI has been a spec play for me of late, as opposed to a trade. Huge upside, but most likely to be worthless. Frankly, I don't think it will remain afloat in its current form, and I'm concerned that shareholder equity will be wiped out. But, I'll be delighted to discover that that isn't the case.

It's still possible though, that Karmazin can secure new financing - in which case Ergen will make a nice profit, but not have significant control over the fate of the company. I'm not banking on the that, but it's a possiblity.
 

BoyGenius

Cyber Bully Victim
Time to close physical locations and solely 'rent' their wares on the 'net. Posibly even 86ing renting of physical media and start renting VOD. Team up with DirecTV, Comcast, Verizon FiOS, etc.

That "someone" buying the debt is Charles Ergen of EchoStar and Dish Network. The fate of Sirius XM is pretty much up to him. Is he loaning to keep SIRI afloat or is he after acquiring the satellites/S-band spectrum at low market value? I'm betting on the former and bought in @ .13/share.

People that buy the "debt" have a claim to fame. People that own the stock get nothing.

Corporate Bankruptcy

:popcorn:
 
People that buy the "debt" have a claim to fame. People that own the stock get nothing.

Corporate Bankruptcy

:popcorn:

Do you really think that TWL is buying SIRI stock right now without understanding how bankruptcies work and without knowing what the ramifications of the various possibilities might be? I sure hope not, but I'll give them the benefit of the doubt.
 

BoyGenius

Cyber Bully Victim
Do you really think that TWL is buying SIRI stock right now without understanding how bankruptcies work and without knowing what the ramifications of the various possibilities might be? I sure hope not, but I'll give them the benefit of the doubt.

I don't know about him, but I know lots of other people don't. Ask all the idiots that thought Circuit City was a great deal at .19 cents how they're doing now?

Many newer investors don't know the pecking order of debt.

:popcorn:
 
Top